Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2019.25.2.039

Robo-Advisor Algorithm with Intelligent View Model  

Kim, Sunwoong (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems / v.25, no.2, 2019 , pp. 39-55 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently banks and large financial institutions have introduced lots of Robo-Advisor products. Robo-Advisor is a Robot to produce the optimal asset allocation portfolio for investors by using the financial engineering algorithms without any human intervention. Since the first introduction in Wall Street in 2008, the market size has grown to 60 billion dollars and is expected to expand to 2,000 billion dollars by 2020. Since Robo-Advisor algorithms suggest asset allocation output to investors, mathematical or statistical asset allocation strategies are applied. Mean variance optimization model developed by Markowitz is the typical asset allocation model. The model is a simple but quite intuitive portfolio strategy. For example, assets are allocated in order to minimize the risk on the portfolio while maximizing the expected return on the portfolio using optimization techniques. Despite its theoretical background, both academics and practitioners find that the standard mean variance optimization portfolio is very sensitive to the expected returns calculated by past price data. Corner solutions are often found to be allocated only to a few assets. The Black-Litterman Optimization model overcomes these problems by choosing a neutral Capital Asset Pricing Model equilibrium point. Implied equilibrium returns of each asset are derived from equilibrium market portfolio through reverse optimization. The Black-Litterman model uses a Bayesian approach to combine the subjective views on the price forecast of one or more assets with implied equilibrium returns, resulting a new estimates of risk and expected returns. These new estimates can produce optimal portfolio by the well-known Markowitz mean-variance optimization algorithm. If the investor does not have any views on his asset classes, the Black-Litterman optimization model produce the same portfolio as the market portfolio. What if the subjective views are incorrect? A survey on reports of stocks performance recommended by securities analysts show very poor results. Therefore the incorrect views combined with implied equilibrium returns may produce very poor portfolio output to the Black-Litterman model users. This paper suggests an objective investor views model based on Support Vector Machines(SVM), which have showed good performance results in stock price forecasting. SVM is a discriminative classifier defined by a separating hyper plane. The linear, radial basis and polynomial kernel functions are used to learn the hyper planes. Input variables for the SVM are returns, standard deviations, Stochastics %K and price parity degree for each asset class. SVM output returns expected stock price movements and their probabilities, which are used as input variables in the intelligent views model. The stock price movements are categorized by three phases; down, neutral and up. The expected stock returns make P matrix and their probability results are used in Q matrix. Implied equilibrium returns vector is combined with the intelligent views matrix, resulting the Black-Litterman optimal portfolio. For comparisons, Markowitz mean-variance optimization model and risk parity model are used. The value weighted market portfolio and equal weighted market portfolio are used as benchmark indexes. We collect the 8 KOSPI 200 sector indexes from January 2008 to December 2018 including 132 monthly index values. Training period is from 2008 to 2015 and testing period is from 2016 to 2018. Our suggested intelligent view model combined with implied equilibrium returns produced the optimal Black-Litterman portfolio. The out of sample period portfolio showed better performance compared with the well-known Markowitz mean-variance optimization portfolio, risk parity portfolio and market portfolio. The total return from 3 year-period Black-Litterman portfolio records 6.4%, which is the highest value. The maximum draw down is -20.8%, which is also the lowest value. Sharpe Ratio shows the highest value, 0.17. It measures the return to risk ratio. Overall, our suggested view model shows the possibility of replacing subjective analysts's views with objective view model for practitioners to apply the Robo-Advisor asset allocation algorithms in the real trading fields.
Keywords
Robo-Advisor; Mean-Variance Optimization; Intelligent View Model; Black-Litterman Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Beketov, M., K. Lehmann and M. Wittke, "Robo Advisors: quantitative methods inside the robot", Journal of Asset Management, Vol.19 (2018), 363-370.   DOI
2 Best, M. and R. Grauer, "On the sensitivity of mean-variance-efficient portfolios to changes in asset means- Some analytical and computational results", The Review of Financial Studies, Vol.4(1991), 315-342.   DOI
3 Black, F. and R. Litterman, "Asset allocation: Combing investor views with market equilibrium", Journal of Fixed Income, Vol.1 (1991), 7-18.   DOI
4 Duqi, A., L. Franci and G. Torluccio, "The Black-Litterman model: The definition of views based on volatility forecasts", Applied Financial Economics, Vol.24(2014), 1285-1296.   DOI
5 He, P., A. Grant and J. Fabre, "Economic value of analyst recommendations in Australia: An application of the Black-Litterman asset allocation model", Accounting and Finance, Vol.53(2013), 441-470.   DOI
6 Idzorek, T., "A step-by-step guide to the Black-Litterman model", Ibbotson Associates, Working Paper, 2005.
7 Kim, K.-j. and H. Ahn, "Optimization of Support Vector Machines for financial forecasting", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.17(2011), 223-236.
8 Kim, S.W and H. Ahn, "Development of an intelligent trading system using Support Vector Machines and genetic algorithms", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.16(2010), 71-92.
9 Kim, S.W. and H.S. Choi, "Estimation of GARCH models and performance analysis of volatility trading system using Support Vector Regression", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.23(2017), 107-122.   DOI
10 Kooli, M. and M. Selam, "Revisiting the Black-Litterman model: The case of hedge funds", Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds, Vol.16(2010), 70-81.   DOI
11 Markowitz, H., "Portfolio selection", The Journal of Finance, Vol.7(1952), 77-91.   DOI
12 Park, J. J., "The performance comparison between the Black-Litterman mean-variance and Copula-Option-Pooling model", Korean Journal of Financial Studies, Vol.45(2016), 343-378.
13 Pyo, S. and J. Lee, "Exploiting the low-risk anomaly using machine learning to enhance the Black-Litterman framework: Evidence from South Korea", Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol.51(2018), 1-12.   DOI
14 Reddy, P., "Black-Litterman portfolios with machine learning derived views", available at www.reaserchgate.net, 2018, 1-28.
15 Satchell, S. and A. Scowcroft, "A demystification of the Black-Litterman model: Managing quantitative and traditional construction", Journal of Asset Management, Vol.1(2000), 138-150.   DOI
16 Song, J., Y. Lee and G. Park, "Sector investment strategy with the Black-Litterman model", Korean Management Science Review, Vol.29 (2012), 57-71.   DOI
17 Walters, J., "The Black-Litterman model in detail", Jay Walters, CFA, 2014.