Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2014.20.2.179

Learning Material Bookmarking Service based on Collective Intelligence  

Jang, Jincheul (Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST)
Jung, Sukhwan (Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST)
Lee, Seulki (Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST)
Jung, Chihoon (Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST)
Yoon, Wan Chul (Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST)
Yi, Mun Yong (Dept. of Knowledge Service Engineering, KAIST)
Publication Information
Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems / v.20, no.2, 2014 , pp. 179-192 More about this Journal
Abstract
Keeping in line with the recent changes in the information technology environment, the online learning environment that supports multiple users' participation such as MOOC (Massive Open Online Courses) has become important. One of the largest professional associations in Information Technology, IEEE Computer Society, announced that "Supporting New Learning Styles" is a crucial trend in 2014. Popular MOOC services, CourseRa and edX, have continued to build active learning environment with a large number of lectures accessible anywhere using smart devices, and have been used by an increasing number of users. In addition, collaborative web services (e.g., blogs and Wikipedia) also support the creation of various user-uploaded learning materials, resulting in a vast amount of new lectures and learning materials being created every day in the online space. However, it is difficult for an online educational system to keep a learner' motivation as learning occurs remotely, with limited capability to share knowledge among the learners. Thus, it is essential to understand which materials are needed for each learner and how to motivate learners to actively participate in online learning system. To overcome these issues, leveraging the constructivism theory and collective intelligence, we have developed a social bookmarking system called WeStudy, which supports learning material sharing among the users and provides personalized learning material recommendations. Constructivism theory argues that knowledge is being constructed while learners interact with the world. Collective intelligence can be separated into two types: (1) collaborative collective intelligence, which can be built on the basis of direct collaboration among the participants (e.g., Wikipedia), and (2) integrative collective intelligence, which produces new forms of knowledge by combining independent and distributed information through highly advanced technologies and algorithms (e.g., Google PageRank, Recommender systems). Recommender system, one of the examples of integrative collective intelligence, is to utilize online activities of the users and recommend what users may be interested in. Our system included both collaborative collective intelligence functions and integrative collective intelligence functions. We analyzed well-known Web services based on collective intelligence such as Wikipedia, Slideshare, and Videolectures to identify main design factors that support collective intelligence. Based on this analysis, in addition to sharing online resources through social bookmarking, we selected three essential functions for our system: 1) multimodal visualization of learning materials through two forms (e.g., list and graph), 2) personalized recommendation of learning materials, and 3) explicit designation of learners of their interest. After developing web-based WeStudy system, we conducted usability testing through the heuristic evaluation method that included seven heuristic indices: features and functionality, cognitive page, navigation, search and filtering, control and feedback, forms, context and text. We recruited 10 experts who majored in Human Computer Interaction and worked in the same field, and requested both quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the system. The evaluation results show that, relative to the other functions evaluated, the list/graph page produced higher scores on all indices except for contexts & text. In case of contexts & text, learning material page produced the best score, compared with the other functions. In general, the explicit designation of learners of their interests, one of the distinctive functions, received lower scores on all usability indices because of its unfamiliar functionality to the users. In summary, the evaluation results show that our system has achieved high usability with good performance with some minor issues, which need to be fully addressed before the public release of the system to large-scale users. The study findings provide practical guidelines for the design and development of various systems that utilize collective intelligence.
Keywords
Collective Intelligence; Social bookmarking system; Recommender system; Heuristic evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Yoon, W. C. & Yi, M. Y., "A New e-Learning System Based on Integrative Collective Intelligence", Telecommunications Review, 20,6 (2010), 943-952.
2 Perkins, D. N. "What Constructivism Demands of the Learner", Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation, Vol. 31 (1992), 161-165
3 Tullis, T. & Albert, B., "Measuring the User Experience: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics", Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (2008).
4 UXforthemasses, "A guide to carrying out usability reviews" (2011) http://www.uxforthemasses.com/usability-reviews/.
5 Indeed.com, Slideshare (2014) http://www.indeed.com/cmp/Slideshare
6 Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. "Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective". Special Education, Vol. 16 (1999).
7 Alag, S., "Collective Intelligence in Action", Manning Publications (2008).
8 Leadbeater, C., "We-Think: Mass innovation, not mass production", Profile Books; 2 edition (2009).
9 Molich, R. and Nielsen, J., "Improving a human-computer dialogue: What designers know about traditional interface design", Communications of the ACM, 33, 3 (1990), 338-348.   DOI
10 Nielsen, J. and Molich, R., "Heuristic Evaulation of User Interfaces", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1990), 249-256.
11 IEEE computer society, Top Technology Trends for 2014. (2013) http://www.computer.org/port-al/web/membership/Top-10-Tech-Trends-in-2014.