Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2012.18.3.079

An Intelligent Decision Support System for Selecting Promising Technologies for R&D based on Time-series Patent Analysis  

Lee, Choongseok (Department of e-Business, Korea Polytechnic University)
Lee, Suk Joo (Graduate School of Business IT, Kookmin University)
Choi, Byounggu (College of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
Publication Information
Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems / v.18, no.3, 2012 , pp. 79-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
As the pace of competition dramatically accelerates and the complexity of change grows, a variety of research have been conducted to improve firms' short-term performance and to enhance firms' long-term survival. In particular, researchers and practitioners have paid their attention to identify promising technologies that lead competitive advantage to a firm. Discovery of promising technology depends on how a firm evaluates the value of technologies, thus many evaluating methods have been proposed. Experts' opinion based approaches have been widely accepted to predict the value of technologies. Whereas this approach provides in-depth analysis and ensures validity of analysis results, it is usually cost-and time-ineffective and is limited to qualitative evaluation. Considerable studies attempt to forecast the value of technology by using patent information to overcome the limitation of experts' opinion based approach. Patent based technology evaluation has served as a valuable assessment approach of the technological forecasting because it contains a full and practical description of technology with uniform structure. Furthermore, it provides information that is not divulged in any other sources. Although patent information based approach has contributed to our understanding of prediction of promising technologies, it has some limitations because prediction has been made based on the past patent information, and the interpretations of patent analyses are not consistent. In order to fill this gap, this study proposes a technology forecasting methodology by integrating patent information approach and artificial intelligence method. The methodology consists of three modules : evaluation of technologies promising, implementation of technologies value prediction model, and recommendation of promising technologies. In the first module, technologies promising is evaluated from three different and complementary dimensions; impact, fusion, and diffusion perspectives. The impact of technologies refers to their influence on future technologies development and improvement, and is also clearly associated with their monetary value. The fusion of technologies denotes the extent to which a technology fuses different technologies, and represents the breadth of search underlying the technology. The fusion of technologies can be calculated based on technology or patent, thus this study measures two types of fusion index; fusion index per technology and fusion index per patent. Finally, the diffusion of technologies denotes their degree of applicability across scientific and technological fields. In the same vein, diffusion index per technology and diffusion index per patent are considered respectively. In the second module, technologies value prediction model is implemented using artificial intelligence method. This studies use the values of five indexes (i.e., impact index, fusion index per technology, fusion index per patent, diffusion index per technology and diffusion index per patent) at different time (e.g., t-n, t-n-1, t-n-2, ${\cdots}$) as input variables. The out variables are values of five indexes at time t, which is used for learning. The learning method adopted in this study is backpropagation algorithm. In the third module, this study recommends final promising technologies based on analytic hierarchy process. AHP provides relative importance of each index, leading to final promising index for technology. Applicability of the proposed methodology is tested by using U.S. patents in international patent class G06F (i.e., electronic digital data processing) from 2000 to 2008. The results show that mean absolute error value for prediction produced by the proposed methodology is lower than the value produced by multiple regression analysis in cases of fusion indexes. However, mean absolute error value of the proposed methodology is slightly higher than the value of multiple regression analysis. These unexpected results may be explained, in part, by small number of patents. Since this study only uses patent data in class G06F, number of sample patent data is relatively small, leading to incomplete learning to satisfy complex artificial intelligence structure. In addition, fusion index per technology and impact index are found to be important criteria to predict promising technology. This study attempts to extend the existing knowledge by proposing a new methodology for prediction technology value by integrating patent information analysis and artificial intelligence network. It helps managers who want to technology develop planning and policy maker who want to implement technology policy by providing quantitative prediction methodology. In addition, this study could help other researchers by proving a deeper understanding of the complex technological forecasting field.
Keywords
Patent Analysis; Time-Series Data Mining; Artificial Neural Networks; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Decision Support Systems;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, K.-j. and W. B. Lee, "Stock Market Prediction using Artificial Neural Networks with Optimal Feature Transformation", Neural Computing and Application, Vol.13, No.3 (2004), 255-260.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kim, S. S., "An Empirical Study on Practical Use of TRM(Technology Roadmap) and R&D Performance: Focus on Korean Enterprise", Master's thesis, Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University, 2008.
3 Kim, S.-W. and H. Ahn, "Development of an Intelligent Trading System Using Support Vector Machines and Genetic Algorithms", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.16, No.1(2010), 71-92.
4 Ko, B. Y. and H. S. Noh, "Discovery of Promising Business Items by Technology-industry Concordance and Keyword Co-occurance Analysis of US Patents", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol.8, No.2 (2005), 860-885.
5 Landford, H. W., Technological Forecasting Methodologies : A Synthesis : American Management Association, Inc., 1972.
6 Lee, H., "A Combination Model of Multiple Artificial Intelligence Techniques Based on Genetic Algorithms for the Prediction of Korean Stock Price Index(KOSPI)", Enture Journal of Information Technology, Vol.7, No.2 (2008), 33-43.
7 McNelis, P. D., Neural Networks in Finance : Gaining Predictive Edge in the Market, Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2005.
8 Saaty, T. L., Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publications., 1995.
9 Seo, H. J., Analysis of the Determinants of Technology Innovation Activities and Technological Diffusion Effects using Corporate Patents Data, Science and Technology Policy Institute( STEPI), 2005.
10 Shim, H.-G. and S.-K. Kim, "A study on Forecasting The Operational Continuous Ability in Battalion Defensive Operations using Artificial Neural Network", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.14, No.3(2008), 25-39.
11 Valentini, G., "Measuring the Effect of M&A on Patenting Quantity and Quality", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.33, No.3(2012), 336 -346.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Yoo, S.-H., "A Study on the Forecasting Model of Technology Life Cycles by Analysis of US Patent Citation", Journal of Information Management, Vol.35, No.1(2004), 93-112.   DOI
13 Yoon, M. S., H. Y. Oh, W. H. Lee, G. R. Park, and S. J. Park, Strategic Planning Methodology for National R&D Projects of Emerging Technology : Integrated Procedure of TRM and KM, Science and Technology Policy Institute(STEPI), 2004.
14 Coates, V., M. Faroque, R. Klavins, K. Lapid, H. A. Linstone, C. Pistorius, and A. L. Porter, "On the Future of Technological Forecasting", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.67, No.1(2001), 1-17.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Berry, M. J. A. and G. Linoff, Data Mining Techniques : For Marketing, Sales and Customer Support, Wiley Computer Publishing, 1997.
16 Cambell, R. S., "Patent Trends as a Technological Forecasting Tool", World Patent Information, Vol.5, No.3(1983), 137-143.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Cho, G. T., Y. G. Cho, and H. S. Kang, Hierarchical Decision Making for Advanced Leaders, Donghyun Publishing Co., 2003.
18 Ernst, H., "The Use of Patent Data for Technological Forecasting : The Diffusion of CNC-Technology in the Machine Tool Industry", Small Business Economics, Vol.9, No.4(1997), 361- 381.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Fletcher, D. and E. Goss, "Forecasting with Neural networks and Application using Bankruptcy Data", Information and Management, Vol.24 (1993), 159-167.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Gordon, T. J. and J. C. Glenn, Eds. Futures Research Methodology, Version 2.0 : Millennium Project of the American Council for the United Nations University, 2003.
21 Huang, M.-H., "Constructing a Patent Citation Map Using Biblographic Coupling : A Study of Taiwan's High-Tech Companies", Scientometrics, Vol.58, No.3(2003), 489-506.   DOI
22 Jung, M. K. and J. K. Kim, "The Intelligent Determination Model of Audience Emotion for Implementing Personalized Exhibition", Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, Vol.18, No.1(2012), 39-57.
23 Kang, H.-J., A Study on the Projection of the Promising Fusion Technologies by US Patent Analysis, Doctoral Dissertation, Dept. of Electronics Engineering, Graduate School of Kookmin University, 2006.
24 Kang, H.-J., M. J. Uhm, and D. M. Kim, "A Study on Forecast of the Promising Fusion Technology by US Patent Analysis", Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.14, No.3(2006), 93-116.