Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5515/KJKIEES.2010.21.12.1401

Limits of Fully Anechoic Room for Radiated Disturbance Using Correlation Factor  

Lee, Soon-Yong (Department of Electronic & Communications Engineering, Hanyang University)
Chung, Yeon-Choon (Department of Electronics, Seokyeong University)
Choi, Jea-Hoon (Department of Electronic & Communications Engineering, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Abstract
In this paper, we suggested the tolerance limits of FAR(Fully Anechoic Room) using correlation factor between OATS(Open area Test Site) to measure EMI(Electromagnetic Interference) and FAR to measure EMS(Electromagnetic Susceptibility). FAR Project(SMT4-CT96-2133), CISPR/A/665/DTR, and CISPR A/665/DTR documents are analyzed and theoretical correlation factor based on the documents and theoretical equations is drawn. To obtain the experimental correlation factor, EUT(Equipment Under Test) is fabricated as well as measured at the 10 m distance OATS and in the 3 m distance FAR. Also, to suggest the tolerance limits of EUT with multi sources, radiation theory for electric and magnetic dipoles is programmed. We drew the correlation factor for EUT with multi sources through the programs. As the tolerance limits of FAR is newly defined, It can be used alternative test site for OATS to measure EMI, efficiently.
Keywords
OATS; FAR; Correlation; EMI; Limits;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 안형배, 주정은, 이황재, 강대현, 이종악, "야외시험장과 전자파 완전 무반사실과의 상관성", 한국전자파학회논문지, 13(8), pp. 843-849, 2002년 9 월.
2 M. J. Alexander, National Physical Laboratory, "Development of new measurement methods of EMC characteristics in smaller relatively inexpensive fully anechoic rooms", Draft FAR Project Final Technical Report SMT4-CT96-2133, 2000.
3 CISPR/A/665/DTR CISPR 16-4-5 Ed. 1, "Conditions for the use of alternative test methods", IEC, May 2006.
4 CISPR/A/699/INF, "Comparison of field strength measurements in a SAC and FAR", IEC, Aug. 2006.
5 Tae-Weon Kang, "Extrapolation and correlation in radiated emission measurements and uncertainty in EMC measurements", Pohang University of Science and Technology, Korea, pp. 5-14, Oct. 2000.
6 CISPR/A/603/CD, "Conditions for the use of alternative test methods", IEC, Oct. 2005.
7 CISPR 22 Edition 5.2, "2005 consolidated with amendment 1, 2005 and 2006 Information technology equipment radio disturbance characteristics limit and methods of measurement", IEC, Mar. 2006.
8 CISPR 16-2, "Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods, Part 2: Methods of measurement of disturbances and immunity, IEC, International Special Committee on Radio Interference", Aug. 1999.
9 I. Sreenivasiah, D. C. Chang, and M. T. Ma, "Emission characteristics of electrically small radiating sources from tests inside a TEM cell", IEEE Tans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 113-121, Aug. 1981.   DOI
10 Tea Won Kang, "A deterministic correlation of a fully anechoic chamber and oats measurements using a spherical dipole antenna", Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 46, Apr. 2000.   DOI
11 J. D. Gavenda, "Effects of electromagnetic source type and orientation on signal falloff with distance", IEEE Intl. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Atlanta, GA, pp. 338-341, Aug. 1987.
12 J. D. Gavenda, "Rate of fall-off of the magnetic fie-lds produced by magnetic and electric dipoles", IEEE Intl. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Wakefield, MA, pp. 338-342, Aug. 1985.