Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.4313/JKEM.2014.27.3.172

Analysis of SF6, N2 Pressure Characteristic of Spark Gap According to Simulation  

Choi, Sun-Ho (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)
Lee, Tae-Woo (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)
Bang, Jeong-Ju (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)
Huh, Chang-Su (Department of Electrical Engineering, Inha University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Electrical and Electronic Material Engineers / v.27, no.3, 2014 , pp. 172-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
Industrial, medical, environment and agriculture application of pulse power technology have been developing rapidly in many field. In order to make use in the form of pulses is applied to the pulse forming technique. At this time, spark gap is generally used for the pulse forming. Spark gap may be possible to simulate the shape of the electrode, to know the uniform or non-uniform electric field of the electrode structure. Further, it can be determined using Paschen's law applied pressure of the insulating gas in accordance with the voltage which is created using the value of the electric field. In this paper, we tried to found using a formula and the simulation process to determine the pressure. The value of the electric field is different according to the shape of the electrode. So, the range of pressure applied also varies. In order to withstand the 100 kV with a gap of 5 mm, the nitrogen gas must be applied to about 7 bar in the electrode structure. On the other hand, in the same conditions, Sulfur hexafluoride gas must be applied to about 2 bar. Consequently, the Sulfur hexafluoride gas has a higher insulation properties than nitrogen gas may be applied to low pressure at the same conditions.
Keywords
Spark gap; Pressure characteristic; Paschen's law; Electric field utilization factor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. K. Kang and T. K. Ko, PSAC, 12, 52 (2010).
2 S. H. Nam and H. K. Kang, Trans., KIEE, 60, 1005 (2011).
3 J. S. Doo, S. M. Han, C. S. Huh, and J. S. Choi, Trans., KIEE, 59, 1850 (2010).
4 J. M. Lehr, C. E. Baum, and W. D. Prather, Switching Note, 28, (1997).
5 B. T. Lee, C. H. Hwang, T. H. Lee, C. S. Huh, and Y. M. Chang, Trans. KIEE, 59, 1416 (2010).
6 E. Husain and R. S. Nema, IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul., EI-17, 350 (1982).   DOI
7 H. Fujita, T. Kouno, Y. Noguchi, and S. Ueguri, Cryogenics, 18, 195 (1978).   DOI
8 F. Li, Y. W. Yoo, D. K. Kim, and B. H. Lee, JIEIE, 24, 142 (2010).