Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9729/AM.2017.47.1.36

The Effects of Dielectric Coatings on Electron Emission from Tungsten  

Al-Qudah, Ala'a M. (Department of Physics, Mu'tah University)
Alnawasreh, Shady S. (Department of Physics, Mu'tah University)
Madanat, Mazen A. (Department of Physics, Mu'tah University)
Trzaska, Oliwia (Laboratory of Plastics, Wroclaw University of Technology)
Matykiewicz, Danuta (Institute of Materials Technology, Poznan University of Technology)
Alrawshdeh, Saad S. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Mu'tah University)
Hagmann, Mark J. (Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah)
Mousa, Marwan S. (Department of Physics, Mu'tah University)
Publication Information
Applied Microscopy / v.47, no.1, 2017 , pp. 36-42 More about this Journal
Abstract
Field electron emission measurements were performed on dielectric-coated tungsten emitters, with apex radii in the nanometer and micrometer range, which were prepared by electrochemical etching in NaOH solution. Measurements were performed in a field electron microscopy (FEM) with a base pressure <$10^{-6}$ Pascal ($10^{-8}$ mbar). Four different types of dielectric were used, namely: (1) Clark Electromedical Instruments epoxylite resin, (2) Epidian 6 produced by Ciech Sarzyna S. A., (3) a Radionox solution of colloidal graphite; and (4) Molyslip 2001 E compound ($MoS_2$ and MoS). Current-voltage measurements and FEM images were used to investigate the characteristics of these composite emitters, and to assess how the different types of dielectric coating affect the suitability of the composite emitter as a potential electron source.
Keywords
Field electron emitter; Dielectric layers; Composite emitters; Field electron microscope;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Crewe A V, Wall J, and Welter L M (1968) A high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscope. J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5861-5868.   DOI
2 Zhu W (2001) (ed.) Vacuum Microelectronics (Wiley, New York).
3 Dyke W P and Dolan W W (1956) Field emission. Adv. Electronics Electron Phys. 8, 89-185.
4 Al-Qudah A, Mousa M S, and Fischer A (2015) Effect of insulating layer on the field electron emission performance of nano-apex metallic emitters. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 92, 012021.
5 Crewe A V, Isaacson M, and Johnson D (1969) A simple scanning electron microscope. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 40, 241-246.   DOI
6 Crewe A V and Wall J (1970) A scanning microscope with 5 A resolution. J. Mol. Biol. 48, 375-393.   DOI
7 Madanat M A, Mousa M S, Al-Rabadi A N, and Fischer A (2015) Electron microscopy-based performance evaluation of various tungsten field-emitter tips Apex radii. Jo. J. Phys. 8, 79-85.
8 Forbes R G (2008) Description of field emission current/voltage characteristics in terms of scaled barrier field values. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26, 209-213.   DOI
9 Forbes R G, Deane J H B, Fischer A, and Mousa M S (2015) Fowler-Nordheim plot analysis: a progress report. Jo. J. Phys. 8, 125-147; arXiv 1504.06134v7.
10 Latham R V and Mousa M S (1986) Hot electron emission from composite metal-insulator micropoint cathodes. Appl. Phys. 19, 699-713.
11 Melmed A J (1991) The art and science and other aspects of making sharp tips. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 9, 601-608.   DOI
12 Mousa M S (1990) Cold cathode field emission using both Al-resin and Au-resin coatings on tungsten substrate. Surf. Sci. 231, 142-148.   DOI
13 Mousa M S and Al Share M (1999) Study of the MgO-coated W emitters by field emission microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 79, 195-202.   DOI
14 Mousa M S, Fischer A, and Mussa K O (2012) Metallic and composite micropoint cathodes: aging effect and electronic and spatial characteristics. Jo. J. Phys. 1, 21-26.
15 Mousa M S, Karpowicz A, and Surma S (1994) Switch-on phenomena in field electron and field ion microscopy. Vacuum 45, 249-254.   DOI