Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2018.1.001

Rock Permeability Estimation from Hydraulic Injection Tests in a Sealed Borehole Interval  

Quach, Nghiep Q. (Department of Geology, Chungnam National University)
Jo, Yeonguk (Department of Geology, Chungnam National University)
Chang, Chandong (Department of Geology, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Engineering Geology / v.28, no.1, 2018 , pp. 1-9 More about this Journal
Abstract
We propose a borehole test technique to estimate permeability of rocks in borehole. The borehole tests are hydraulic injection tests such as leak-off test and hydraulic fracturing tests, which are originally conducted for stress or casing integrity assessment and not for permeability measurement. We use one-dimensional radial diffusion equation to interpret fluid injection test results in terms of permeability. We apply this technique to a leak-off test conducted at a depth of 700 m in a wellbore, where rock formation is mudstone. The estimated permeability is at an order of $10^{-16}m^2$, which is somewhat high but within the range reported for mudstones previously. Quantitative rick assessment suggests that an accurate measurement of open hole section length is important to improve reliability of results. More data may be needed to ensure the reliability of this technique. If validated, however, this technique can provide cost-effective estimation of in situ permeability without conducting independent permeability tests in borehole.
Keywords
hydraulic injection test; permeability; diffusion equation; mudstone;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Liang, J.Q., 2002, Application of Quantitative Risk Analysis to Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient Prediction, the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Texas, SPE 77354, 1-9.
2 Lin, W., Yamamoto, K., Ito, H., Masago, H., Kawamura, Y., 2008, Estimation of minimum principal stress from an extended leak-off test onboard the Chikyu Drilling Vessel and suggestions for future test procedures, Scientific Drilling, 6, 43-47.   DOI
3 Lohman, S.W., 1972, Ground-Water Hydraulics, Geological Survey Professional Paper 708, US Geological Survey, Washington, DC, 70p.
4 Luijendijk, E., Gleeson, T., 2014, How well can we predict permeability in sedimentary basins? Deriving and evaluating porosity-permeability equations for noncemented sand and clay mixtures, Geofluids, 15, 67-83.
5 Mollah, A.M., Sayed, S.A.S., 1995, Assessment of in situ permeability with emphasis on parker testing in Kuwait, Engineering Geology, 39, 217-231.   DOI
6 Moos, D., Peska, P., Finkbeiner, T., Zoback, M., 2003, Comprehensive wellbore stability analysis utilizing quantitative risk assessment, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 38, 97-109.   DOI
7 Neuzil, E.C., 1994, How permeable are clays and shales?, Water Resources Research, 30(2), 145-150.   DOI
8 Oliver, D.S., 1992, Estimation of Radial Permeability Distribution from Well-Test Data, SPE Formation Evaluation, 7(4), 290-296.   DOI
9 Pearson, R., Money, M.S., 1977, Improvements in the Lugeon or packer permeability test, Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 10, 221-239.   DOI
10 Raaen, A.M., Horsrud, P., Kjorholt, H., Okland, D., 2006, Improved routine estimation of the minimum horizontal stress component from extended leak-off tests, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 43, 37-48.   DOI
11 Wang, T.C., Yeh, D.H., 2008, Obtaining the steady-state drawdown solutions of constant-head and constant-flux tests, Hydrological Processes, 22, 3456-3461.   DOI
12 Rasmussen, T.C., Evans, D.D., Sheets, P.J., Blanford, J.H., 1993, Permeability of Apache Leap Tuff: Borehole and Core Measurements Using Water and Air, Water Resources Research, 29, 1997-2006.   DOI
13 Selvadurai, A.P.S., Carnaffan, P., 1997, A transient pressure pulse method for the mesurement of permeability of a cement grout, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(3), 489-502.   DOI
14 Uehara, S., Takahashi, M., 2014, Evolution of permeability and microstructure of experimentally-created shear zones in Neogene siliceous mudstones from Horonobe, Japan, Journal of Structural Geology, 60, 46-54.   DOI
15 White, A.J., Traugott, W.O., Swarbrick, R.E., 2002, The use of leak-off tests as means of predicting minimum in-situ stress, Petroleum Geoscience, 8, 189-193.   DOI
16 Alireza, A.M., Rick, C., 2015, Laboratory investigation of Shale permeability, the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference in Calgary, Canada, 27p.
17 Wu, Y.S., Pruess, K., 2000, Integral solutions for transient fluid flow through a porous medium with pressure-dependent permeability, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 37(1), 51-61.   DOI
18 Yang, Y., Aplin, A.C., 2007, Permeability and petrophysical properties of 30 natural mudstones, Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, 1-14.
19 Zoback, M.D., 2007, Reservoir Geomechanics, Cambridge University Press.
20 Addis, M.A., Hanssen, T.H., Yassir, N., Willoughby, D.R., Enerver, J., 1998, A comparison of Leak-Off Test And Extended Leak-Off Test Data For Stress Estimation, the SPE/ISRM Eurock, 98, 131-140.
21 Crolet, M.J., Hatri, E.M., 1998, Recent Advances in Problems of Flow and Transport in Porous Media, Springer Science & Business Media, 11, 244p.
22 Aplin, A.C., Fleet, A. J., Macquaker, J.H.S., 1999, Muds and mudsrones: physical and fluid-flow properties, Geology Society London Special Publications, 158, 1-8.   DOI
23 Bai, M., Elsworth, D., 2000, Coupled processes in subsurface deformation, flow, and transfort, American Society of Civil Engineers, 334p.
24 Bethke, M.C., 1989, Modeling subsurface flow in sedimentary basins, Geologische Rundschau, 78(1), 129-154.   DOI
25 Bjorlykke, K., 1993, Fluid flow in sedimentary basin, Sedimentary Geology, 86, 137-158.   DOI
26 Cappa, F., Rutqvist, J., 2011, Modeling of coupled deformation and permeability evolution during fault reactivation induced by deep underground injection of CO2, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 336-346.   DOI
27 Domenico, P.A., Schwartz, F.W., 1998, Physical and Chemical Hydrogeology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 506p.
28 Gjonnes, M., Cruz, A.M.G.L., Horsrud, P., Holt, R.M., 1998, (Leak-off tests for horizontal stress determination?, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 20, 63-71.   DOI
29 Hamm, S., Kim, M., Cheong, J., Kim, J., Son, M., Kim, T., 2007, Relationship between hydraulic conductivity and fracture properties estimated from packer tests and borehole data in a fractured granite, Engineering Geology, 92, 73-87.   DOI
30 Johnson, C.R., Greenkorn, R.A., Woods, E.G., 1966, Pulse-Testing: A New Method for Describing Reservoir Flow Properties Between Wells, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 18(12), 1599-1604.   DOI
31 Knipe, R.J., Jones, G., Fisher, Q.J., 1998, Faulting, fault sealing and fluid flow in hydrocarbon reservoirs: an introduction. Geological Society London Special Publications, 147(1), vii-xxi.
32 Kruseman, P.G., de Ridder, A.N., Verweij, M.J., 1994, Analysis and Evaluation of Pumping Test Data, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, The Netherlands, 377p.