Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2014.2.171

Enhancement of Seismic Stacking Energy with Crossdip Correction for Crooked Survey Lines  

Kim, Ji Soo (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Lee, Sun Jung (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Seo, Yong Seok (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Ju, Hyeon Tae (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
The Journal of Engineering Geology / v.24, no.2, 2014 , pp. 171-178 More about this Journal
Abstract
In seismic reflection data processing, the crossdip correction effectively focuses the stacking energy near the sharp bends of a crooked survey line. Additionally, approximate 3-D information on the reflector (e.g., true crossdip angle and lateral continuity) are locally investigated as a by-product of the crossdip correction procedure. Improvement of the signal-to-noise ratio and estimation of reflector crossdip attitude are tested, in terms of both common midpoint bin direction and processing-line type, using synthetic seismic reflection data. To effectively image the reflection energy near bends in seismic survey lines, straight-line binning is preferred to slalom-line binning.
Keywords
seismic reflection data; crooked line; slalom-line binning; CMP binning; crossdip correction;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Singh, S. P., Agnihotri, N., Dhiman, P., and Ghosh, G. K., 2010, Crooked line seismic survey in thrust-belt and mountainous area of Mizoram, North East INDIA: A Case Study, Biennial International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, 125-128.
2 Wang, W. and West, G. F., 1991, Stacking processes of crooked lines using the SUN/INSIGHT System, Lithoprobe Seismic Processing Facility Newsletter, 4, 13-18.
3 Wu, J., 1996, Short Note: Potential pitfalls of crooked-line seismic reflection surveys, Geophysics, 61(1), 277-281.   DOI
4 Yilmaz, O., 2001, Seismic data analysis: processing, inversion, and interpretation of seismic data no. 10, 2027 p.
5 Bois, L. D., Levato, L., Besnard, J., Escher, A., Marchant, R., Oliver, R., Ouwehand, M., Sellami, S., Steck, A., and Wagner, J. J., 1990, Pseudo-3D study using crooked line processing from the Swiss Alpine western profile-Line 2 (Val d'Anniviers-Valais), Tectonophysics, 173, 31-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kim J., Moon, W. M., Percival, J. A., and West, G. F., 1992, Seismic imaging of shallow reflectors in the eastern Kapuskasing structural zone, with correction of cross-dip attitudes, Geophysical Research Letters, 19, 2035-2038.   DOI
7 Kim, J. S. and Moon, W. I., 1994, Pseudo 3-D Image Reconstruction of Reflector with Crossdip Attitudes in Seismic Reflection Data Processing, Geological Society of Korea, 30(1), 105-110.
8 Larner, K. L., Gibson, B., Chambers, R., and Wiggins, R. A., 1979, Simultaneous estimation of residual statics and crossdip time corrections, Geophysics, 44, 1175-1192.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Malehmir, A., Cedric, S., Emmanuel, B., Gilles, B., Christopher, J., and Ari, T., 2009, 3D constraints on possible deep > 2.5 km massive sulphide mineralization from 2D crooked-line seismic reflection data in the Kristineberg mining area, northern Sweden, Tectonophysics, 479(3-4), 223-240.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Nedimovi , M. R., Mazzotti, S., and Hyndman, R. D., 2003, Three-dimensional structure from feathered twodimensional marine seismic reflection data: The eastern Nankai Trough, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108(B10), 2456, EPM 1-1-EPM 1-14.   DOI
11 Nedimovi , M. R., and West, G. F., 2003, Crooked-line 2D seismic reflection imaging in crystalline terrains: Part 1, data processing, Geophysics, 68, 274-285.   DOI
12 Schlumberger, 2012a, OMNI3D Workshop Seismic Survey Design & Modeling, USA.
13 Schlumberger, 2012b, VISTA 2D/3D Full PRO Seismic Processing Software, USA.
14 Sheriff, R. E. and Geldart, L. P., 1982, Exploration seismology, Cambridge University Press, 624 p.