Development and Enhancement of Conceptual Site Model for Subsurface Environment Management
![]() |
Bae, Min Seo
(SMART-SEM(Subsurface Environment Management) Research Center)
Kim, Juhee (SMART-SEM(Subsurface Environment Management) Research Center) Lee, Soonjae (SMART-SEM(Subsurface Environment Management) Research Center) Kwon, Man Jae (SMART-SEM(Subsurface Environment Management) Research Center) Jo, Ho Young (SMART-SEM(Subsurface Environment Management) Research Center) |
1 | Chang, S.W., Moon, H.S., Lee, E., Joo, J.C., and Nam, K., 2019, Numerical study of contaminant pathway for risk assessment in subsurface of contaminated sites, J. Soil Groundwater Environ., 24(3), 13-23. DOI |
2 | DTSC, 2008, PROVEN TECHNOLOGIES AND REMEDIES GUIDANCE - REMEDIATION OF METALS IN SOIL, Department of Toxic Substances Control California Environmental Protection Agency (https://dtsc.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/31/2018/11/PT-R_Metals_Main_Text_0808-2.pdf) |
3 | ITRC, 2018, TPH Risk Evaluation at Petroleum-Contaminated Sites, The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council, https://tphrisk-1.itrcweb.org/5-conceptual-site-models-and-investigative-strategies/ (Jun, 24th 2021) |
4 | NAVFAC, 2017, Conceptual Site Model Development and Update Plan, Investigation and Remediation of Releases and Groundwater Protection and Evaluation, Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility, (https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-09/documents/red_hill_conceptual_site_model_development_plan_2017-09-01.pdf) |
5 | USEPA, 1988, Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies Under CERCLA, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 540-G-89-004, (https://semspub.epa.gov/work/06/901141.pdf) |
6 | McLane Environmental LLC, 2018, A Quantitative Conceptual Site Model Approach for Environmental and Engineering Decision Making (https://www.flexaem.com/downloads/QCSM%20White%20Paper_2018.pdf) |
7 | NJDEP, 2019, Technical Guidance for Preparation and Submission of a Conceptual Site Model, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (https://www.nj.gov/dep/srp/guidance/srra/csm_tech_guidance.pdf) |
8 | NTEPA, 2013, GUIDELINES ON CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELS, Northern Territory Environment Protection Authority (https://ntepa.nt.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/904327/draft_guidelines_conceptual_site_models.pdf) |
9 | SNC-Lavalin, 2022, Preliminary Conceptual Site Models of Potential Contamination (https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/air-land-water/water/flood-response-and-the-environment/water-quality/preliminary_conceptual_site_models_of_potential_contamination.pdf) |
10 | USACE, 2012, CONCEPTUAL SITE MODELS, US Army Corps of Engineers, EM 200-1-12 (https://www.publications.usace.army.mil/portals/76/publications/engineermanuals/em_200-1-12.pdf) |
11 | USEPA, 2006, Innovations in Site Characterization Case Study: The Role of a Conceptual Site Model for Expedited Site Characterization Using the Triad Approach at the Poudre River Site, Fort Collins, Colorado, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 542-R-06-007 (https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/poudre_river_case_study.pdf) |
12 | USEPA, 2011, Environmental cleanup best management practices: effective use of the project life cycle conceptual site model, US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA 542-F-11-011 (https://clu-in.org/download/techdrct/csm-life-cycle-fact-sheetfinal.pdf) |
13 | Yang, K., Hwang, S.I., Park Y., and Jeong A., 2018, A study on the linked management of environmental media in contaminated sites, Korea Environment Institute, 2018(0), 1-81. |
14 | ITRC, 2015, Integrated DNAPL Site Characterization and Tools Selection, https://projects.itrcweb.org/DNAPL-ISC_tools-selection/ (June 21st, 2022) |
![]() |