Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7857/JSGE.2016.21.6.001

Draft Guideline Matching the Treatment Technology to the Soil Contaminated Site Based on the Site Properties in Korea  

Lee, Jae-young (Department of Environmental Engineering, The University of Seoul)
Lee, Minhee (Department of Earth Environmental Sciences, Pukyong National University)
Yu, Mokryun (Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment / v.21, no.6, 2016 , pp. 1-13 More about this Journal
Abstract
The programmable logic array to match the treatment technology to the soil contaminated site based on the site properties in Korea was developed. Based on the previous technology screening system of FRTR (Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable) in USA, total 9 evaluation factors indicating the site characteristics were used for the technology matching process and 8 factors among them were quantitatively weighed in the order of importance. The class interval for each evaluation factor was linearly distributed to give the weighed score and 8 scores were summed up to prioritize the treatment technology. The optimal treatment technology for a specific site was determined according to the total score acquired from 8 evaluation factors used in this technology matching process. The reliability test for the developed technology matching system was done by using information of two real cleanup sites in Korea, suggesting that this guideline will be available to determine the most effective treatment technology to cleanup the soil contaminated site and also to assist the government or the company to design a successful and cost-effective site cleanup plan in Korea.
Keywords
Evaluation factor; Soil pollution; Soil property; Soil remediation; Technology matching process;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), 2016, Canadian soil information system, https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/agriculture/soil.html. Canada.
2 CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment), 2008, National classification system for contaminated sites (Guidance document), ISBN 978-1-896997-80-3, Final Report, Canada.
3 AGI (American Geosciences Institute), 2016, The groundwater and soil contamination database, http://www.americangeosciences.org/georef/online-database-products, USA.
4 FRTR (Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable), 2016, Remediation technologies screening matrix and reference guide, Version 4.0, USA.
5 Jeong, S., Kim, Y., Kim, J., and Hwang, S., 2011, Development of preliminary assessment methodology for priority listing of soil and groundwater contamination sources, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 16(6), 106-112.
6 Jung, H., Lee, M., and Doe, J., 2015, The priority management ranking by using the classification of vulnerable areas for the soil contamination in Busan metropolitan city, J. Soil Groundw. Environ., 20(7), 1-12.   DOI
7 KEI (Korea Environment Institute), 2003, Program of the maintenance and the remediation for soil contaminated sites, Final Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
8 KEITI (Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute), 2014, Study of the statistical data collection and the application programs in the soil environmental area, Final Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
9 KEITI (Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute), 2015, The construction of inventory for soil and groundwater cleanup technologies, Annual Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
10 KEITI (Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute), 2016, Korea national environmental technology information center, http://www.konetic.or.kr/.
11 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2007a, General soil investigation for abandoned heavy metal mines in Korea, Annual Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
12 KOSSGE (Korea Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment), 2014, Soil environmental engineering, Hyangmoon Inc., Seoul, 394 p.
13 Lee, M., 2010, Study on the evaluation standards for the ranking of the precise investigation to asbestos-contaminated abandoned mines, Korea, Econ. Environ. Geol., 43(4), 393-400.
14 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2006, Guidance for soil risk assessment, MOE regulation 283, Final Report, Korea.
15 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2007b, Guideline for the soil remediation technologies, Final Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
16 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2009, The master plan for soil conservation in Korea, Final Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
17 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2010, The standardization of the soil cleanup industry and the plan to obtain its international competitiveness, Final Report, Ministry of Environment, Korea.
18 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2016b, Regulation 19, The soil environmental conservation law, Korea.
19 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2012, Assessment of soil and groundwater pollution for industrial complex in Korea, Annual Report. Ministry of Environment, Korea.
20 MOE (Ministry of Environment), 2016a, Notification 2016-18, The soil environmental conservation law, Korea.
21 NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research), 2016, The soil and groundwater information system, http://sgis,nier.go.kr/.
22 RDA (Rural Development Administration), 2016, Korean soil information system, http://soil rda.go.kr/.
23 USEPA, 2004, Treatment technologies for site cleanup, Annual Status Report (11th edition), USA.
24 UBA (The Umweltbundesamt), 2016, Topics; soil/agriculture, http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/soil-agriculture, Germany.
25 USEPA, 1992, Guidance for performing site inspections under CERCLA, EPA/540/R-92/021, Final Report, USA.
26 USEPA, 1993, Innovative treatment technologies: semi-annual status report, EPA/542/R-93/003, Final Report, USA.
27 USEPA, 2008, A systematic approach for evaluation of capture zone at pump and treat systems, EPA 600/R-08/003, Final Report, USA.