Browse > Article

Performance Evaluation of the Field Scale Sequential Washing Process for the Remediation of Arsenic-Contaminated Soils  

Choi Sang Il (Department of Environmental Engineering Kwangwoon University)
Kim Kang Hong (Department of Environmental Engineering Kwangwoon University)
Han Sang-Keun (Department of Environmental Engineering Kwangwoon University)
Publication Information
Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment / v.10, no.6, 2005 , pp. 68-74 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was carried out to evaluate the feasibility of field-scale sequential soil washing process for remediation on Kyongsangnamdo D mine soils which was heavily contaminated by arsonic. Arsenic concentration of untreated soils was $321\pm32mg/kg$. By applying the basic operating condition which was proposed from several pilot-scale experiments, arsenic concentration of treated soils was reduced 2.04 mg/kg ($99\%$ removal efficiency). We optimized the basic operating condition (mainly on washing solution concentration, cut-off size, and mixing ratio) to improve efficiently and economically the field-scale sequential soil washing process. The resulting optimized conditions were that solution concentration is 0.2M HCl, 1.0M HCl, 1.0M NaOH, that the cut-off size is 0.15mm (seive $\sharp$100), and that the mixing ratio is 1 3. Also, the optimized pH value for soil washing effluent treatment was 6 (33 ppb), in which the precipitation disruption caused by supersaturation of the floe did not occur. Results of TCLP tests showed that arsenic concentration from the washed gravels was 1.043 mg/L, that from soils ND (not detected), and that from filter cakes 0.066 mg/L. Also, the water content as a percentage of dewatered sludges was low $(48\%)$ and so the dewatered sludges can be disposed by landfilling. Through these results, we can concluded that tile field-scale sequential soil washing process developed in this study is adopted for remediation of arsenic-contaminated soils.
Keywords
Arsenic; Field scale sequential soil washing process; Economical operation condition; pH; TCLP;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 환경부, 2002c, 토양환경보전법
2 환경부, 2002d, 폐기물관리법
3 Kim, J.Y., Davis, A.P., and Kim, K.W., 2003, Stabilization of Available Arsenic in Highly Contaminated Mine Tailings Using Iron, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 189-195   DOI   ScienceOn
4 West, C.C. and Harwell, J.F., 1992, Surfactant and Subsurface Remediation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26(12), 2324-2330   DOI
5 환경부, 2002a, 토양오염공정시험법
6 이효민, 윤은경, 최시내, 박송자, 황경엽, 조성용, 김선태, 1998, 폐광산 지역의 비소오염에 대한 복원목표 설정: 미래 토지용도를 고려한 접근방법, 한국토양환경학회지, 3(2), 13-29
7 USEPA, 1997a, Innovative Treatment Technologies: Annual Status Report 7th ed., EPA 542-R-95-008
8 Gregor, J., 2001, Arsenic Removal during Conventional Aluminium-Based Drinking-Water Treatment, Wat. Res., 35(7), 1659-1664   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Ford, R.G., 2002, Rates of Hydrous Ferric Oxide Crystallization and the Influence on Coprecipitation Arsenate, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(11), 2459-2463   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 황정성, 최상일, 장민, 2004, 비소로 오염된 토양에 대한 토양세척기법의 적용성 연구, 한국지하수토양환경학회지, 9(1), 104-111
11 환경부, 2002b, 폐기물공정시험법
12 황정성, 최상일, 한상근, 2005, 폐 철광산주변 비소로 오염된 토양에 대한 연속세척기법의 적용, 한국지하수토양환경학회지, 10(1), 58-64
13 USEPA, 1997b, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods (SW846), 3rd ed. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC