Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2022.50.6.015

Reimagining "A Picturesque Landscape" - The Borrowed Scenery of the Byungsan Neo-Confucian Academy, Korea, and its Heuristic Instrumentality -  

Lee, Kyung-Kuhn (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.50, no.6, 2022 , pp. 15-29 More about this Journal
Abstract
The Byungsan Neo-Confucian Academy, a 17th-century World Heritage Site in Korea, is being praised as a manifestation of naturalness or non-artificiality of the traditional Korean borrowed scenery technique (借景, chagyeong). This study, however, aims to reinterpret the chagyeong of the Byungsan Academy (hereafter the Academy) as a device of illusion evoking an idealized vision of nature. In the process of interpretation, 'picture and frame'-a widely accepted expression that represents the chagyeong of the Academy-will be foregrounded as the pivotal concept mediating the change of perspectives from naturalistic to ideological. This study consists of the following three parts. First, it shows that 'picture and frame' represent a modern way of seeing the Academy as an architectural heritage in harmony with nature; it denotes pristine nature and the empty architectural frame that safely circumscribes the innate beauty of the natural landscape. Second, departing from the naturalistic perspective, this study argues that the architectural framework of the Academy composes scenography enticing the viewer to imagine the idealized, Confucian image of nature that compares to the landscape imagery found in the landscape poetry and paintings that were produced and appreciated by the 17th-century Confucian literati. Lastly, based on the above interpretation, this study stresses that the 'picture' one encountered at the Academy in the 17th century was not the framed scene of a natural landscape but the illusion it caused; the architectural 'frame' worked not as a symbol of naturalness but as an institutional apparatus of vision manipulating the way one sees-and therefore imagines-the landscape.
Keywords
Korean Landscape Tradition; Visual Culture; Way of Seeing; Neo-Confucianism; Gewu-Zhizhi;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Huh, J.(2009) A visual image analysis of Byungsan Seowon by an attribute of view. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(4): 86-93. 
2 Ivanhoe, P. J.(1998) Early Confucianism and environmental ethics. In Tucker, M. E. and Berthrong, J. eds., Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans. Cambridge, MA: Center for the Study of World Religions. pp. 59-76. 
3 Jackson, J. B.(1984) The word itself. In Discovering the Vernacular Landscape. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. pp. 3-8. 
4 Jang, W. S.(2010) A study of Confucian sense of art in the theory of painting. The Study of Eastern Classic 39: 277-311. 
5 Jay, M.(1988). Scopic regimes of modernity. In Foster H. ed., Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press. pp. 3-23. 
6 Johnson, N. B.(1989) Geomancy, sacred geometry, and the idea of a garden: Tenryu-ji temple, Kyoto, Japan. The Journal of Garden History 9(1): 1-19.    DOI
7 Jullien, F.(1995) The Propensity of Things: Toward a History of Efficacy in China. New York, NY: Zone Books. 
8 Jullien, F.(2018) Living off Landscape: Or the Unthought-of in Reason. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. 
9 Kalton, M. C.(1998) Extending the neo-Confucian tradition - Questions and reconceptualization for the twenty-first century. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25(1): 75-100.    DOI
10 Keum, J. T.(2009) Emptiness and Brightness. Seoul: J&C Publishing Corporation. 
11 Kim, B. R.(2006) Byungsan Seowon. In The Story of Korean Architecture 3. Paju: Dolbaegae. pp. 12-59. 
12 Kim, B. R.(2011) Chagyeong. In Seung, H. ed., Korean Beauty. Seoul: Korean Culture and Information Service, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism. pp. 49-53. 
13 Kim, H. B.(2012) The influence of landscape paintings in Joseon dynasty on the styles of landscape garden. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(2): 49-63.    DOI
14 Kim, I. S.(2017) The study about the 'artistic conception' of oriental landscape painting. The Journal of Society for Humanities Studies in East Asia 38: 299-317. 
15 Kim, Y. M.(2013) A study on problems of seowon landscape preservation and management, and improvement measures. The Research for Traditional Korean Culture 11: 107-131. 
16 Lee, H.(1561) Dosanjapyoung(陶山雜詠). 
17 Lee, S. J.(2018) From East Asian Thinking. Paju, Korea: Dongnyok Publisher. 
18 Li, C.(2006) The Confucian ideal of harmony. Philosophy East and West 56(4): 583-603.    DOI
19 Maeng, H. Y.(2019) Deleuze's aesthetics of transcendental realism and the aesthetics of following tao. Journal of Research in Art Education 20(3): 21-42.    DOI
20 Meinig, D. W.(1979) The Beholding Eye: Ten Versions of the Same Scene. In The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes: Geographical Essays. pp. 33-48. 
21 Meyer, E. K.(1997) The expanded field of landscape architecture. In Thompson, G. and Stener F. eds., Ecological Design and Planning. New York, NY: John Wiloy & Sons. pp. 45-79. 
22 Moon, H. C.(1998) A Study on the Visual System and the Meaning in Mandaeru of Byungsan Seowon. Ph. D. Dissertation. Hanyang University. 
23 Ruggles, D. F.(1997) The eye of sovereignty: Poetry and vision in the Alhambra's Lindaraja Mirador. Gesta 36(2): 180-189.    DOI
24 Pae, J. H.(1999) Landscape design and pictorialized view on nature: A critical examination. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 27(3): 80-87. 
25 Park, J.(2004) On Kant's theory of schematism - Origin and meaning of the transcendental schematism. Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 24: 163-187. 
26 Park, Y. T.(2010) Definition of home and attitude towards nature reflected in landscape paintings. The Review of Korean Cultural Studies 33: 31-63.    DOI
27 Ryu, S. R.(1588) Yeonjwaruchusa(燕坐樓秋思). 
28 Shin, D. H., C. S. Oh, Y. S. Kim and Y. I. Hwang(2012) Ancient-to-modern secular changes in Korean stature. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 147: 433-442.    DOI
29 Shin, G. H.(1996) A comparative study of Toegye's heuristics and eidetic intuition of Husserl's phenomenology. Phenomenology and Contemporary Philosophy 9: 11-84. 
30 So, H. S.(2011) A study on the structure of Soshaewon landscape garden featuring borrowed scenery - Focusing on the Soshaewon Sisun and the Thrity Poems of Soshaewon. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 29(4): 59-69.    DOI
31 Sung, J. S.(2011) Thoughts on walk an garden of Joseon dynasty - Focused on scholar garden in mountain. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 9: 41-52. 
32 Sung, J. S.(2012) Walking in the garden: A comparative study of Geumswaedong, Humble administrator's garden, and Rousham gardens. Journal of Environmental Studies 51: 73-95. 
33 Zhu, X.(1183) Wuyijingshezayong (武夷精舍雜詠). 
34 Tu, W.(2001) The ecological turn in new Confucian humanism: Implications for China and the world. Daedalus 130(4): 243-264. 
35 Waldheim, C.(2016) Introduction: From figure to field. In Waldheim, C. ed., Landscape as Urbanism: A General Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 2-11. 
36 Yoo, K. J.(2016) Study on phenomenological approach to the achievement of Confucian learning. Philosophical Investigation 44: 35-67.    DOI
37 World Heritage Convention(2008) The Criteria for selection. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/criteria/ [Accessed May, 2019]. 
38 World Heritage Convention(2011). Tentative lists - Seowon, Confucian Academies of Korea. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5648/ [Accessed May, 2019].
39 Choi, G. S.(2005) Traditional Korean landscape architecture seen in perspective of the borrowed scenery technique. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture 23(1): 158-165. 
40 Bigg, C.(2007) The panorama, or la nature a coup d'oeil. In Fiorentini, E. ed., Observing Nature-Representing Experience: The Osmotic Dynamics of Romanticism. Berlin: Reimer. pp. 73-95. 
41 Choi, J. M.(2009) Toegye's philosophy and the mirror metaphor. Yang-Ming Studies 24: 265-311.    DOI
42 Choi, W. Y.(2002) The Public Spirit of Sarim Politics in the Middle Chosun Period: Its Ideology, Structure and Change. Ph. D. Dissertation. Yonsei University. 
43 Collot, M.(2011) Horizon and horizon structure: Between east and west. European Society and Culture 7: 5-34. 
44 Conan, M.(2003) Introduction: garden and landscape design, from emotion to the construction of self. In Conan, M. ed., Landscape Design and the Experience of Motion. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library. pp. 11-33. 
45 Foster, H.(1988). Preface. In Foster, H. ed., Vision and Visuality. Seattle: Bay Press. pp. ix-xiv. 
46 Corner, J.(1992) A discourse on theory II: Three tyrannies of contemporary theory and the alternative of hermeneutics. Landscape Journal 10(2): 115-133.    DOI
47 Corner, J.(2014) Drawing and making in the landscape medium. In Landscape Imagination: Collected Essays of James Corner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. 161-196. 
48 Cosgrove, D.(1998) Social Formation and Symbolic Landscape. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 
49 Fowles, J.(1979) The Tree. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 
50 Fung, S.(1996) Dualism and polarism: Structures of architectural and landscape architectural discourse in China and the West. Interstices 4: 1-22. 
51 Fung, S.(2003) Movement and stillness in ming writings on gardens. In Conan, M. ed., Landscape Design and the Experience of Motion. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library. pp. 243-262. 
52 Gombrich, E. H.(1961) Art and Illusion. New York, NY: Pantheon Books. 
53 Graham, A. C.(1986) Yin-Yang and the Nature of Correlative Thinking Vol. 6. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies. 
54 Hall, D. L. and R. T. Ames(1987) Thinking through Confucius. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. 
55 Hall, D. L. and R. T. Ames(1995) Anticipating China: Thinking through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Culture. Albany, NY: SUNY Press. 
56 Hann, R.(2018) Beyond Scenography. London: Routledge. 
57 Hay, J.(1985) Surface and the Chinese painter. Archives of Asian Art 38: 95-123.