Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2020.48.6.025

A Study on the Directions of Sewol Ferry Tragedy Memorial Park Based on the Analysis on Social Discourse and Recognition Evaluation  

Kim, Do-Hun (Institute of Environmental Planning at Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.48, no.6, 2020 , pp. 25-38 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of this study is to propose a direction for creating a memorial park for the 250 students victims of the Sewol ferry disaster. To this end, this study first attempted to understand the matters discussed at various levels to create a memorial park and find a way that the park can be built by gathering opinions from the bereaved families and the victims themselves, as well as local residents, and experts. Workshops, competitions, special lectures, and websites, etc, were analyzed. A social discourse analysis methodology was used for systematic analysis, and the analyzed discourse was categorized into 4 types for assessment, and the functions and roles were subdivided into 15 types. To assess the priorities and the adequacy of the discourse, an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used among 30 activists, public servants, and experts. Then, a survey was conducted to analyze the perception of the residents (467 participants including the bereaved families) about the memorial park. Based on the results of the analysis, two directions were set for the memorial park. First, is a memorial park to remember the victims in everyday life. It must be a park with various cultural contents instead of a conventional memorial park that is solemn and grave sharing anguish and sorrow. The memorial park for the Sewol ferry disaster must become a space where visitors can naturally encounter and remember the victims. Second, is a park that serves as a catalyst that brings change and innovation to the community. It must be able to bring change to the community with direct and indirect influence. It must serve as an impetus to bring change and innovation to the community in the mid-to-long-term. Having many visitors may also lead to an economic effect. These visitors may not just stay in the park, but even contribute to revitalizing the local businesses. The purpose of this study is to apply the research findings to guide the International Design Competition scheduled for 2020 and serve to establish guidelines for a continuous park management system.
Keywords
4.16 Memorial Park; Conflict of in the Ansan Community; International Competition Design Guideline; Victim's Participation Design;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 U.D.I.K.(2017) A study on schematic design for Sewol Ferry tragedy memorial park. Research Report to Office for Government Policy Coordination.
2 Wasserman, J. R.(1998) To trace the shifting sands: community, ritual, and the memorial landscape. Landscape Journal 17(1): 42-61.   DOI
3 Zoh, G. M.(2018) Park management of the citizen participation. 4·16 Park Opening Forum.
4 4.16 Ansan Citizens Solidarity(2019) Companion to the 4·16 life safety park international design competition guidelines: Suggestions from Citizens. 4·16 Foundation.
5 https://www.ansan.go.kr/www/contents.do?key=32(City Hall)
6 https://416foundation.org(416foundation)
7 https://416parkfriends.modoo.at/(Friends of 4.16Park)
8 http://www.kyeongin.com/main/view.php?key=20190826010008801
9 https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?oid=021&aid=0002349734
10 http://416ansan.com/?mod=document&uid=107&page_id=499(4.16Ansan Citizens Solidarity Blog)
11 http://www.kyeonggi.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=2173551
12 Park, J. C.(2009) Deliberative democracy and citizen's participation: the case of 21st century town hall meeting. Civil Society and NGOs 7(1) : 57-98.
13 Kim, S. B.(2012) The Relationship between Talkshop and Workshop in the Production Process of Public Buildings. Seoul National University Thesis.
14 Fairclough, N.(1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
15 Hajer, M. A.(2005) Rebuilding ground zero. The politics of erformance. Planning Theory & Practice 6(4) : 445-464.   DOI
16 Jung, R. S.(2018) Dark tourism storytelling. 4·16 Park Opening Forum.
17 Kim, J. Y.(2004) Chi-chi earthquake memorial park, Taiwan: Approach and design process. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 32(5) : 129-136.
18 Kim, M. H.(2019a) The process of social memory and the role of remembrance. Special Investigation Committee on Social Affairs Forum. pp. 29-39.
19 Kim, S. R.(2019b) Community coexistence and value diffusion of the memorial space. Special Investigation Committee on Social Affairs Forum.. pp. 59-61.
20 Kim, S. Y. and H. G. Lee(2020) A case study about conflict of Ansan-si community after Sewol Ferry Disaster: Focused on the experience of self ownership. Social Science Research Review 36(2) : 169-195.   DOI
21 Lee, H. S.(2018a) The activation strategy of urban regeneration relation to memorial park. 4·16 Park Opening Forum.
22 Lee, Y. H.(2018b) A Study on The Material And Ritual Aspects of Contemporary Memoria: Focusing on The Cases of Gangnam and Guui Stations. Hanshin University Thesis.
23 Michel Foucault(1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.
24 Min, Y. G.(2018) Production and reconstruction of the placeness of memory. 4·16 Park Opening Forum.
25 Moon, J. S.(2018) 4·16 Park design thinking for all. 4·16 Park Opening Forum.
26 On, S. J.(2020) 2050 Imagine a Park: Could The Park Save The City. Seoul: HanForest.