Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2020.48.4.008

A Study on the Type of Litigation through Analysis of Landscape Precedent  

Park, Hyun-Bin (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Pusan National University)
Kim, Dong-Pil (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Pusan National University)
Moon, Ho-Kyung (National Institute of Ecology)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.48, no.4, 2020 , pp. 8-18 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study selected landscaping-related precedents among Supreme Court decisions to which the Basic Construction Industry Act and Civil Litigation Act were applied, and divided them by year, by sector type, and by litigation type according to the cause of the litigation, and examined time-series trends and the main characteristics of landscaping-related litigation. As a result of the analysis by year, it became apparent that litigation cases began to appear in earnest in 1977, similar to when landscape licenses were first issued. The types according to the cause of the litigation were analyzed by dividing them into 'planning', 'construction', and 'management'. Among them, 'planning' was the most frequently identified (409 cases). Various precedents were searched according to 'construction', and some of them were found to be due to unclear legal standards related to landscaping. In 'management', cases such as safety accidents and crimes were considered. The users, legal definitions, and purposes of the space served as the basis for judgments. As a result of analysis by case type, there were many administrative landscaping-related cases, and the proportion of criminal cases in the management type was the highest. The results of this study looked at precedents across the entire landscape industry, and it was significant that it provides basic data that could be used by the general public as that they were categorized by field. In the future, amendments to the law and various studies should be conducted to reduce and resolve disputes, and it is necessary to expand the publicity of precedents for this purpose.
Keywords
Landscape-Architecture Dispute; Supreme Court Precedents; Typeization; Litigation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Choi, Y. G. (2009) Constitutional Law II. Chungbuk: Daemyung.
2 Hong, I. P. (2007) Judicial precedent and the scope of its binding force. Ilkam Law Review. 12: 1-41.
3 Jang, J. M. (2009) A Study on the Type and Cause Analysis of Dispute in the Apartment Construction. Master's Thesis. Dong-A University.
4 Jun, S. H. (2009) Factors Analysis of Construction Dispute based on Cases. Master's Thesis. Pukyong National University.
5 Justice(2017) Civil Procedure Act. Act No. 14966.
6 Kang, T. S. (2016) A study of civil judicial precedents that conflict or not. The Korean Society of Property Law. 33(1): 83-121.
7 Kim, G. N. (2019) A study on the improvement of construction claims and disputes. Korean Journal of Construction Legal Affairs. 5: 1-42.   DOI
8 Kim, G. T. (2004) A Study on the Categorization of Dispute Types and the Resolution in Construction Disputes. Master's Thesis. Yonsei University.
9 Kim, H. S. (2014) A Study on Plans for Improving the Construction Dispute Resolution Through Case Law Study. Master's Thesis. Hanyang University.
10 Kim, J. S. and J. S. Lee(2005) Improvement plan for domestic construction claims & disputes resolution process - Focused on the construction bonds -. Construction Engineering and Management. 6(4): 181-189
11 Kim, S. C. (2001) A Study on the Embodiment of Information System for the Construction Dispute Precedent Considering User Approaching. Master's Thesis. Dong-A University.
12 Land, Infrastructure and Transport(2019) Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on the Construction Industry. Presidential Decree No. 29665.
13 Lee, D. L. (2010) A Study on Developing Risk Analysis and Management Model During Entire Construction Phase. Master's Thesis. Chungnam National University.
14 Lee, T. S., Y. H. Kim and Y. J. Jun(2005) A suggestion to prevent dispute components in construction -Focus on the most recent construction disputes -. KSCE Convention. 2005(10): 4793-4796.
15 Ministry of Land(2016a) Landscape Design Criteria.
16 Ministry of Land(2016b) Standard specification for landscaping works.
17 Shin, I. S. (2000) A review on the present condition and the properties of the domestic leading cases connected with landscape architecture. Honam University. 21(2): 863-887.
18 National Court Administration(2018) Preliminary rgulations on trial forms. Court Regulation No. 1687.
19 Ock, J. H. and K. P. Kyung(2005) How to successfully manage a conflict in an organization to prevent a claim: A construction conflict case study. Seoul National University of Technology Research Bulletin. 54(2): 521-231.
20 Office of Court Administration(2019) Judicial yearbook.
21 Shin, I. S. (2013) The current status and characteristics of precedents about parks in Korea. Journal of Green Industrial Research Honam Univ. 19(2): 9-14.
22 Shin, K. C. (2002) Development of construction dispute settlement system considering negotiation. Construction Engineering and Management. 3(1): 9-13.
23 Supreme Court(1979) 1979. 1. 30. 선고 78다2204.
24 Supreme Court(1986) 1986. 1. 26. 선고 85누579.
25 Supreme Court(1995) 1995. 10. 13. 선고 94누14247.
26 Supreme Court(1995) 1995. 9. 15. 선고 94다31662.
27 Supreme Court(1997) 1997. 8. 29. 선고 97다19137.
28 Supreme Court(1998) 1998. 10. 2. 선고 98다33888.
29 Supreme Court(1998) 1998. 10. 23. 선고 98마1817.
30 Supreme Court(2007) 2007. 6. 14. 선고 2005다72058.
31 Supreme Court(2016) 2016. 12. 15. 선고 2014도8908
32 https://glaw.scourt.go.kr
33 The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture(2015) Landscape Management. Seoul: Munundang.
34 Yu, J. E. and S. S. Lee(2013) A study on analysing precedents and legal system of landscape tree damage by natural disasters. Jornal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 41(4): 44-87.   DOI