Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2019.47.6.115

A Study on the Recognition of Modern Cultural Heritage Value of Japanese-style Building Groups Using Q Methodology - Focusing on Huam-dong, Seoul -  

Park, Han-Sol (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University)
Sung, Jong-Sang (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.47, no.6, 2019 , pp. 115-128 More about this Journal
Abstract
Huam-dong is a representative area from the Japanese colonial period and is the space where most Japanese-style buildings remain in Seoul. Interest in modern cultural heritage continues to increase, including the registration of cultural properties in 2001, building assets in 2015, and the registration of cultural property units in 2018. As the debate continues over the necessity of preserving cultural heritage that reminds us of the Japanese colonial, there is a need for research to grasp the perceptions of stakeholders along with the perceived value of such spaces. This study identified the subjective perception types of the stakeholders concerned with the Japanese-style building group in Huam-dong, analyzed characteristics by types, and debated the issues. For this purpose, Q methodology, which is a statistical technique for measuring human self-subjectivity and extracting common human perspectives, was used. A literature study on the values of Huam-dong and modern cultural heritage was conducted, and a Q questionnaire based on five aspects of modern cultural heritage values (historical, architectural, sociocultural, landscape, and economic) was applied. The results of the study depicted three types of cognition and showed different attitudes toward the Japanese building group. This study found a conflict comparing the perceptional differences between the types of cognition. This study is meaningful in that it provides an in-depth approach to the perspectives of the stakeholders concerned with the Japanese-style buildings clustered in central Seoul. It is also meant to present a theoretical framework that can be applied to the use area as sustainable cultural heritage through the establishment of preservation and utilization of Japanese-style areas and conflict resolution.
Keywords
Recognition Survey; Heritage Value; Japanese Colonial Period; Qualitative Research Methods; Subjectivity Research;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hong, S. J.(2008a) The formation and transformation of urban identity with special reference to discourses on modern cultural heritage. The Journal of Korean Studies 19: 77-106.
2 Hong, S. Y.(2008b) Study on Method to Regeneration Following the Conservation Value of Modern Architectural. Ph. D. Dissertation, DongA University.
3 Hong, S. Y.(2019) An explorative study of perception on environmental awareness of elementary school students using Q methodology. Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers 8(2): 139-154.   DOI
4 Je, J. S. and B. H. Song(2017) Modern cultural heritage in Busan and issues of historical awareness. Hangdo Busan 33(0): 141.   DOI
5 Jeon, S. J.(1999) A Study On Conservation of the Modern Buildings to exist actually in KangKyoung. M. D. Dissertation, Chungnam National University.
6 JoongAng Ilbo(2019) The first town under Mt.Nam in Seoul, The alleyway where time is also scattered. March 12, A20.
7 Jung, Y. S.(2005) A Study on the Application to Criteria for Conservation of Modern Buildings. M. D. Dissertation, Dongeui National University.
8 Kim, G. H.(2017) An Economic Valuation of Preserving Modern Architecture by Contingent Valuation Method. M. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
9 Kim, I. H.(2016a) The study on modern cultural sites of Shin-hang Li, Asan. Journal of Humanities and Science at Soonchunhyang University 35(4): 5-30.
10 Kim, S. E.(2010a) Theory and philosophy of Q methodology. Korean Society and Public Administraction 20(4): 1-25.
11 Kim, S. E.(2016b) Q Methodology & Social Siences. Seoul: JomteongMunhwa.
12 Kim, S. J. and Y. T. Kim(2012). A study on the criteria for conservation value of modern architecture as culture heritage. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 14(1): 1-8.
13 Kim, S. K.(2010b) Integrated Use of Modern Cultural Heritage in Pedestrian Network Planning of Ganggteong-eup. M. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
14 Lee, G. G.(1996) A Study on the Criteria for Preservation of Existing Buildings. M. D. Dissertation, Konkuk University.
15 Lee, H. M.(2003) Present Situation Examination Study for Conservation and Reuse of a Modern Architecture: Focused on the Registry Cultural Assets, M. D. Dissertation, Hongik University.
16 Lee, H. S.(2011) Research articles: The analysis of relationships between the residents 'The community attachment and their perceptions on modern cultural heritage. Journal of Tourism Sciences 35(10): 329-345.
17 Lee, J. H. and M. J. Kim(2011) A study for estimating the preservation value of heritage tourism resource by a double-bound contingent valuation method. Journal of Tourism Management Research 15(4): 223-246.
18 Lee, K. H. and J. I. Park(2018) Modern cultural heritage utilization using historial maps and satellite pictures. Journal of Korean Dance 40: 117-133.
19 Lee, S. J.(2000) Conservation and Restoration of Modern Architecture as Cultural Properties in Korea. M. D. Dissertation, Chongju University.
20 Oh, M. J. and K. E. Cho(2017) Examining the relationships among interpretation program for visitors, perceived authenticity, attitudes towards conservation of heritage, and perception of tourism invigoration at cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(7): 48-66
21 Son, E. S. and J. H. Pae(2018) Conflicts between the conservation and removal of the modern historic landscapes. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 46(4): 21-35.   DOI
22 Song, Y. and J. S. Kim(2012) Valuing of cultural heritage using contingent valuation method. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research 24(2): 253-267.
23 Song, J. Y. and N. J. Kim(2018) The effect relationship between objective authenticity, experience, existential authenticity and satisfaction of modern cultural heritage site. International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences 33(5): 48-66.
24 Whang, S. M and E. H. Choe(2002) Q-methodology and theory. Journal of KSSSS 7(0): 4-26.
25 Yang, E. J.(2012) Changes of Conservation Plans for a Historic City Center in Gunsan-Based on Content Analyses of Gunsan City Plans, M. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
26 Park, J. H. and K. J. Shin(2014) The types of experts’ consciousness for the conservation and utilization of modern architecture. Journal Korea Society of Visual Design Forum 42(0): 307-318.
27 Ok, S. S. and H. J. Park(2011) Value of modern cultural heritage using contingent value method and real option approach: The study of Seoul City Hall case. Review of Culture & Economy 14(2): 53-74.
28 Park, G. S.(2003) Study on the Composition Scheme for Conservation Guidance of Modern Architecture in Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Myongji University.
29 Park, H. S., S. J. Lee, K. H. Park and E. G. Chang(2010) Conflict Management in Spatial Development Projects. Anyang: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
30 Park, J. M. and J. S. Sung(2013). A study on the value criteria and relative importance for conservation of modern cultural heritage. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(1): 12-20.   DOI
31 Park, K. K., H. J. Ju and O. I. Kim(2001) Analyzing the perception types regarding whistle-blowing within the organization: An application of Q methodology. Korean Public Administration Review 35(1): 109-125.
32 SBS(2019) Newstory 220, An uncomfortable heritage. February 16.
33 Randall M.(2002) Assessing Value in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices. In Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. 5-30. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
34 Ryu, B. S.(2016a) Modern cultural heritage and history of Gunsan. National University Library 34: 5-20.
35 Ryu, J. S.(2016b) The News Perception of Journalists and News Users in Digital Media Age based on Q Methodology and Depth Interview. Ph. D. Dissertation, Sung Kyun Kwan University.
36 Seoul Museum of History(2016) Huam-dong:the History of Duk-tuk Rock, Life in a Cultural House. Seoul:Seoul Museum of History.
37 Cho, J. A.(2018) A study on subjectivity of college students on contraception. Journal of KSSSS 43(0): 27-45.
38 Brown, S. R.(1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of QMethodology in Political Science. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
39 Cho, I. S.(2012) A Study on the Improvement of Publicness with the Regeneration of Historic Buildings. M. D. Dissertation, Chonnam National University.
40 Cho, I. S.(2016a) A Study on the Remodeling Strategies of Historical Building and the Cognitive Evaluation. Ph. D. Dissertation, Chonnam National University.
41 Cho, M. R.(2001) Articles: A study on government - Citizen networks for the preservation of modern cultural heritages. Commnity Development Review 26(1): 187-200.
42 Cho, S. S.(2016b) A study on possibility of eco-museum composition using rural modern cultural heritage. Jouranl fo Museum Scholarship 30(0): 65-89.
43 Choi J. N., and S. H. Lee(2013) Modern cultural heritage value and utilization of archiving data in Daejeon. Journal of Digital Convergence 11(7): 1-7.   DOI
44 Dan, S. H. and Y. J. Choi(2017) The complex library planning using of modern cultural heritage. Journal of the Institute of Constructional Technology 36(2): 43-50.
45 Financial news(2019) Japanese style building. January 20, 31.
46 Herald Economic(2019) 100 Years of Japanese-Style Building ... Become a Consumption Space in Historical Space. February 28, 1.