Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2015.43.4.001

The Haptic Perception Aspect shown in Landscape Architecture before Modernism - Focused on Historical Development Process -  

Kim, Jin-Seob (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Cheongju University)
Kim, Jin-Seon (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.43, no.4, 2015 , pp. 1-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the West, of the body's five senses sight is considered the most important but Ocular-centralistic thinking contains many issues. Privileging the subject and inhibiting interaction with the other senses, Ocular-centrism limits the experience of the world to the visual area. However, experiences can be understood as 'touching' various forms and are related to touch. With the heightened interest in the multi-sensuous side of the body contrary to Ocular-centrism, the intervention of the body in the external space has become an important issue in modern landscape architecture. This study explores the possibility of the haptic perception system that causes the active experience of a subject. Haptic perception plays a catalytic role leading an active experience of the subject and the subject experiences a sense of place through such haptic perception. By revealing what was known through the sense of touch through the concurrency and interaction of the various senses, haptic perception draws active participation The haptic perception system has been studied in various fields but has not been studied in the field of landscape architecture. Thus, this study discusses the aspect of haptic perception limited to landscape architecture shown before modernism. In a discussion on haptic perception, the concept of haptic perception is clarified through previous study reviews and literature and the characteristics of haptic perception are derived. Then, the problems of the Ocular-centrism system and the need for haptic perception are discussed. In the historical development process of haptic perception, the change process of the scopic regime is examined chronologically and the ways in which Ocular-centralistic thinking and anti-Ocular-centralistic thinking have been projected on the architecture and landscape architecture of each age are studied via literature and cases studies. The impact of the scopic regime on the landscape architecture field in the historical change process is examined.
Keywords
Scopic Regime; Ocular-Centrism; Anti-Ocular-Centrism; Tactile;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Aha, W. H., Y. H. Jeon and K. S. Oh(2009) A study on design technology of surface in contemporary architecture. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 11(2): 29-35.
2 Alberti, L. B.(1435) Della Pittura. 노성두(역), 알베르티의 회화론. 서울: 사계절, 2001.
3 Arnheim, R.(1980) "Wie man einen Festkorper wahrnimmt" in Die Dynamil der architektonischen Form. Koln; DuMont Buchverlag, pp. 116-117.
4 Atkins, R.(1990) Art Speaks. 박진선(역), 현대미술의 개념풀이. 서울: 시공사, 1994.
5 Aum, K. H.(2004) A Study of Development in Visual Concept of the Late Modern Paintings. Ph. D. Dissertation. Hong-Ik University. Seoul, Korea.
6 Benevolo, L.(1980) The History of the City, trans. by Geoffery Culverwell, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
7 Benoist-Mechin, J.(1975) L'HOMME ET SON JARDIN. 이봉재(역), 조경진(감수), 정원의 역사. 서울: 르네상스.
8 Bradbury, M. and J. McFarlane(1976) Modernism, 1890-1930. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
9 Buci-Glucksmann, C.(1984) La raison baroque: de Baudelaire a Benjamin. Paris: Editions Galilee.
10 Buci-Glucksmann, C.(1986) La folie du voir: de l'esthetique baroque. Paris: Editions Galilee.
11 Clark, K.(1960) Looking at Pictures. NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. pp. 16-17.
12 Crary, J.(1998) Modernizing vision. In H. Foster, Vision and Visuality (pp. 65-90). Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.
13 Crary, J.(1992) Techiniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Camvridge: MIT Press.
14 Deleuze, G.(1968) Francis Bacon: Logique de la sensation. Paris: Les Editions de Seuil, 하태환(역), 감각의 논리. 서울: 믿음사, 2008.
15 Deleuze, G., Guattari, F.(1980) Mille Plateaux: Capialisme et scbizophrerie, Paris: Les Editions de Minuit , 김재인(역), 천개의 고원. 서울: 새물결, 2003. pp. 907-953.
16 Edgerton, Jr., Damuel Y.(1975) The Renaissance Rediscovery of Linear Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
17 Foucault, M.(1984) Des Espace Autres. In French Journal Architecture /Mouvement/ Continuite 5:46-49, trans by Jay Miskowiec. Of Other Space: Utopias and Heterotopias.
18 Frankl, P.(1989) Principles of Architectural History. 김광현(역) 건축 형태의 원리. 서울: 기문당.
19 Giedion, S.(1967) Time, Space and Architecture. Harvard University Press(5th edition). pp. 31-34.
20 Gioseffi, D.(1963) Perspective. Encyclopedia of World Art, Vol. XI, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
21 Gombrich, E. H.(1984) The economy of vision. In E. H. Gombrich, The Sense of Order(pp. 95-97). Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
22 Harrison, R. P.(2008) Gardens: An Essay on the Human Condition. University of Chicago Press. pp. 105-118.
23 Houlgate, S.(1993) Vision, reflection, and openness: The "Hegemony of Vision" form a Hegelian Point of View. In D. M. Levin, Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision(pp. 100). University of California Press.
24 Hwang, K. E.(2011) Interpreting Landscape. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.
25 Hildebrand, A.(1918), Das Ploblem der Form in der Bildenden Kunst. Strassburg: Heitz, 조창섭(역), 조형미술의형식. 서울: 믿음사, 1989. pp. 20-21.
26 Ivins, Jr., William M.(1973) On the Rationalization of Sight. New York: Da Capo Press.
27 Jang, I. Y.(2006) A Study on the Hybrid Tendency in the Contemporary Landscape Design. Ph. D. Dissertation. Cheongju University.
28 Jay, M.(1993) Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29 Jay, M.(1998) Scopic regimes of modernity. In H. Foster, Vision and Visuality(pp. 3-23). Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.
30 Jeon, Y. C. and S. W. Kim(2008) A study on representation techniques of visual tactility in the surface of contemporary architecture. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design 17(3): 139-147.
31 Joo, E. W.(2003) Vision and Modernity. Seoul: Hannarae.
32 Levin, D. M.(1993) Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision. University of California Press, 정성철, 백문임(역), 모더니티와시각의헤게모니. 서울: 시각과 언어, 2004. pp. 1-52.
33 Le Corbusier(1930) Precisions: On the Present State of Architecture and City Planning. MIT press(Cambridge, MA).
34 Lee, E. J.(2009) La formation du pittoresque et le jardin paysager en France. Etudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en France 29: 253-284.   DOI
35 Lee, J. G.(1997) 근대적 시.공간의 탄생. 파주: 푸른숲.
36 Lynch, D.(2013) Auteurism and Haptic Perception in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me and Inland Empire, pp. 3.
37 Matz, C.(1982) The Imaginary Signifier: Psyschoanalysis and the Cinema. Indiana University Press.
38 McLuhan, M.(1962) The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division.
39 McLuhan, M.(1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw-Hill.
40 Pallasmaa, J.(2012) The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. the third edition, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
41 Panofsky, E(1991) Perspective As Symbolic Form. trans, by Christopher S, Wood, New York: Zone Books.
42 Park, M. Y.(2013) A Study on the Temporality through Haptic Space. Master Thesis, Hongik University.
43 Park, S. R.(2013) A Study on the Haptic-Visual Phenomena in Peter Zumthor's Architecture. Master Thesis, Seoul National University.
44 Park, Y. W.(2009) Philo Architecture: Contemporary Architecture & Philosophy. Seoul: 향연.
45 Rasmussen, S. E.(1951) Towns and Buildings. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
46 Pirenne, M. H.(1970) Optics, Painting & Photography. Cambridge University Press.
47 Poole, G. J.(1972) Architecture andMan's Skyline. NY: Dodd, Mead&Co.
48 Psarra, S.(2008) Architecture and Narrative: The Formation of Space and Cultural Meaning. London & New York: Routledge. pp. 25-56.
49 Romanyshyn, R. D.(1989) Technology as Symptom and Dream. London & New York: Routledge.
50 Rose, J.(1986) Sexuality in the Field of Vision. London: Verso. pp. 232-233.
51 Ryu, J. H. and Y. S. Kim(2007) A study on the expression method of the sublime beauty. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 9(2): 17-22.
52 Scharf, A.(1986) Art and Photography. Penguin Books. 문범(역) 예술과 사진. 서울: 미진사.
53 Schroer, M.(2006) Raume, Orte, Grenzen: Auf dem Weg zu einer Sozialigie des Raums. Suhrkamp, pp. 36.
54 Seo, B. R. and Y. K. Oh(2013) A study on the sensibility characteristics in haptic space. Journal of the Korean Institute of Interior Design 22(5): 162-170.
55 Sennett, R.(1996) Flesh and Stone: The Body and the City in Western. New York: W.W. Norton.
56 Smith, M. M(2007) Sensory History. UK: Berg Pub Ltd, 김상훈(역), 감각의 역사. 서울: 사람과 무늬, 2011. pp. 20-21.
57 Spencer, H.(1975) The Image Maker: Man and His Art. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
58 Tuan, Y. F.(1974) Topophilia, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 이옥진(역), 토포필리아. 서울: 에코리브르, 2011.
59 Strauss, A. L. and J. Corbin(1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Theory(2en ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
60 Tafuri, M.(1968) Teorie e storia dell' architettura. 김일현(역), 건축의 이론과 역사. 파주: 동녘, 2009. pp. 165-168.
61 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GardensofBomarzo
62 Riegl, A.(1901) Late Roman Art Industry. trans. Rolf Winkes, Giorgio Bretschneider Editore, Italy, Rome, 1985.(Originally published as Spatromische Kunstindustrie, Vienna, 1901)