Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.6.031

A Study on the Landscape Attractions Evaluative Systems of Gyeongju Historic Heritage Sites  

Kang, Tai-Ho (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Dongguk University-Gyeongju)
Yu, Wen-Dong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Dongguk University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.42, no.6, 2014 , pp. 31-38 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is an evaluation index development research based on the Gyeongju Historic Heritage Sites to identify the attractive properties of Gyeongju that have helped determine the competitiveness of this historical city. Through literature reviews on these attractive factors of historic urban landscape, the Vienna memos(UNESCO, 2005) and the International Cultural Tourism Charter(ICOMOS, 1999), two professional investigations were conducted following a backup group of attraction indexes that had been received prior. In the end, 22 attraction indexes were chosen in the Urban Historical and Cultural area, the Heritage Resources area, and the Urban Environment area with three aspects based on the analysis of Importance(M), Standard deviation(SD), Content Validity Ratio(CVR), Agreement, and convergence. These indicators will be useful basic information for improving the city's historic charms. In the future, these indicators can be used as a basis for evaluating the characteristic charms of Gyeongju, through which the charm of Gyeongju can be re-recognized.
Keywords
Attractive Factors; History and Culture; Heritage Resources; Urban Environment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ritchie, J. R. B. andM. Zins(1978) Culture as determinant of the attractiveness of a tourism region. Annals of Tourism Research 5(2): 252-267.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 UNESCO(1972) Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention.
3 Seo, C. H. and H. S. Ko(2008) The comparative studies on the effect of the local festival image about visitors' behavioral intentions. Hotel Management Studies 17(1): 217-234.
4 Seo, T. Y.(1991) A Study on Tourism Position. Ph. D. Thesis, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
5 Sharpley, R. and J. Sharpley(1997) Rural Tourism: An Introduction. London: International Thomson Business Press.
6 UNESCO(2005) Vienna Memorandum.
7 UNESCO(2011) Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape.
8 Uysal, M. and C. Jurowski(1994) Testing the push and pull factors. Annals of Tourism Research 21(4): 844-846.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Yoon, K. J.(1989) A Study on Tourist Perceptions and Preferences for Selected National Parks as Tourist Destinations. Ph. D. Thesis, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea.
10 Keon, J. T.(2000) The Impact of the Post-Image and Motivation of Tourism-event upon Satisfaction and Revisit Intention. Ph. D. Thesis, Daegu University, Daegu, Korea.
11 Jeong, H. Y.(2002) The Influences of the Attraction on Tourist Satisfaction and Revist Intention in Tourism-event. M.S. Thesis, Dong A University, Busan, Korea.
12 Jo, M. H.(2002) Determine the academic status of tourism. Tourism and Leisure Studies 14(3): 3-14.
13 Kastarlak, B.(1971) Planning tourismgrowth. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly 11: 26-33.   DOI
14 Keon, M. H. and K. E. Lee(2005) The influences of the attraction on tourist satisfaction and revisit intention in culture tourism festival. Tourism Management Studies 24.
15 Kim, K. S.(1995) Hierarchy of Multi-Objective on Tourism Development. Ph. D. Thesis, Geongki University, Seoul, Korea.
16 Ko, H. S. and Y. C. Baek(1999) An emperical study on festival market segmentation by benefit sought. Hotel Management Studies 9(1): 46-64.
17 Koo, Y. C.(2007) Development and Validity Analysis of Restructuring Criteria for Private Colleges and Universities. Ph. D. Thesis, KonKuk University, Seoul, Korea.
18 Kwon, T. I.(2008) Study on Drawing Priority of the Influence Factors of Tourist Resort Remodeling Business: Delphi Technic&Analytic Hierarchy Process. Ph. D. Thesis, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
19 Lee, Z. S.(2001) Research Methods 21: Delphi Method. Seoul: Education Science Society.
20 Lee, A. J.(1988) A Study on Tourism Destination Choice. Ph. D. Thesis, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
21 Lee. J. J.(1997) Development and Application of the Image Measurement Scale in the Regional Festival. Ph. D. Thesis, Geongki University, Seoul, Korea.
22 An, Y. J.(2003) The Relationships of Cultural Attraction Attributes, Interpretation, and Tourist Satisfaction. M.S. Thesis, Dong A University, Busan, Korea.
23 Bojanic, D. C.(1991) The use of advertising in managing destination image. Tourism Management 12: 352-355.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Carlson, A.(1976) Environmental aesthetics and the dilemma of aesthetic education. Journal of Aesthetic Education 10: 69-82.   DOI
25 Gartner, W. C.(1989) Techniques image: Attribute measurement of state tourism product using multidimensional scaling techniques. Journal of Travel Research 4(1): 1-15.
26 Goodrich, J. M.(1977) Benefit bundle analysis: An empirical analyst of international travelers. Journal of Travel Research 16(2): 6-9.   DOI
27 Gunn, Clare A.(1988) Tourism Planning(2nd ed.). New York: Taylor and Francis.
28 Inskeep, E.(1991) Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
29 Harris, David R.(1972) The origins of agriculture in the tropics: Ecological analysis affords new insights into agricultural origins and suggests a fresh evaluation of the limited archaeological evidence. American Scientist 60(2): 180-193.
30 ICOMOS(1999) International Cultural Tourism Charter.
31 Jang, S. and L. Cai(2002) Travel motivations and destination choice: a study of British outbound market. Journal of Travel &Tourism13(3): 111-133.