Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.6.147

A Study on Wetland Visitors' Awareness of Ecology and Their Needs  

Jeong, Jae-Man (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Cheongju University)
Oh, Jeong-Hak (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Gyeonggi Urban Innovation Corporation)
Kim, Jin-Seon (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.41, no.6, 2013 , pp. 147-157 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the correlation between wetland visitors' consciousness of ecology and their needs and thereby, provide for some effective measures to manage them. For this purpose, 3 study points were set up: "wetland visitors' consciousness of ecology and their needs", "differences of such consciousness depending on their demographic variables" and the "relationship between such consciousness and their needs". To this end, Upo Wetland visitors were surveyed for an empirical analysis. The visitors' awareness about ecology was measured with Dunlap's 15-item NEP Inventory, while their needs were analyzed in reference to Maslow's 7-Step Human Desire Ladder. The survey was conducted at Upo Wetland for 3 days, and as a result, a total of 228 questionnaires were returned. The results of this study can be summarized as follows; First, the visitors' consciousness of ecology and their needs were higher than the normal level. In terms of their consciousness of ecology, their awareness of the ecological crisis potential and anti-humanism was highest. In terms of their needs, the aesthetic need was highest, followed by the cognitive one. On the other hand, the needs for self-achievement and self-esteem were lowest; except them, the higher the needs were positioned at Maslow's ladder of desire, and subjects were more responsive to them. As a result of analyzing the correlation between the subjects' consciousness of ecology and their needs, it was found that the correlation was negative in some sub-areas, while being positive in other sub-areas. After all, the ratio of the sub-areas having a positive correlation was as 3 times high as that of the sub-areas having a negative correlation. Even as for the correlation coefficient values, they were higher in the positive sub-areas, which suggests that the correlation between wetland visitors' consciousness of ecology and their needs were positive, although at a lower level, in overall terms. As a result of comparatively analyzing visitors' needs by dividing them into 3 sub-groups depending on the levels of their consciousness of ecology, it was found that the higher their consciousness of ecology was, their needs were higher. Overall, wetland visitors' awareness of ecology was higher than the normal level, and it was estimated that such awareness would continue to increase. Hence, it could be inferred that their needs, particularly, their aesthetic and cognitive ones would continue to increase, too. Accordingly, it is deemed important to manage the wetland landscape making use of its visual resources, while continuing to provide the visitors with the contents fulfilling their need for knowledge.
Keywords
New Ecological Paradigm(NEP); Attitude; Behavior; Aesthetic Needs; Cognitive Needs;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Carson, R.(1962) Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2 Crossley, J. and B. Lee.(1994) Ecotourists and mass tourists: a difference in 'benefits sought'. Proceedings of the Travel and Tourism Research Association Annual Conference. Bal Harbour: Travel and Tourism Research Association.
3 Diamantis, D.(1998) Consumer behaivor and ecotourism products. Annals of Tourism Research 25(2): 515-518.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dunlap, R. E. and K. D. Van Liere(1978) The new environmental paradigm. Journal of Environmental Education 9: 10-19.   DOI
5 Dunlap, R. E. and R. E. Jones(2003) Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap and W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology(pp.482-524). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
6 Dunlap, R. E., K. D. Van Liere, A. Mertig and R. E. Jones(2000) Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: a revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56: 425-442.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Eagles, P.(1992) The travel motivations of Canadian ecotourists. Journal of Travel Research 31(2): 3-7.
8 Fransson, N. and T. Gärling(1999) Environmental concern: conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 369-382.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Heidegger, Martin(1962) Technik und die Kehre, Lee Ki Sang(trans.) technique and turn. Seoul: Seokwang. 1993.
10 Herberlein, T. A.(1981) Environmental attitudes. Zeitschrift fur Umweltpotik 4: 241-270.
11 Jelly, A.(1983) Personality Theories, Lee Hun Ku(trans.), Seoul: Bobmunsa.
12 Johnston, B. R., ed.(1990) Breaking out of the tourist trap. Cultural Survival Quarterly 14(1): 2-5.
13 Kang, Mi Hee, Nam Jo Kim and Seungj Dam Choi(2002) Identification of ecotourists' distinctive characteristics by comparing with mass tourists : Focusing on travel motivations and attitudes. Korea Academic Society of Tourism Management 17(2): 157-175.
14 Kim, Jin and Dong Wan Ko(2011) A change in tourism environmental attitudes through ecotourism activities - Focusing on ecotourism participants in Upo wetlands -. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 39(1): 56-64.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kim, Young Pil(1998) Review Contemporary Philosophy. Seoul: Yimun.
16 Ko, Young Bok(2000) Dictionary of Sociology. Seoul: Center for Society & Culture.
17 Kusler, Jon(1991) Conclusions and recommendations in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposiumon Strengthening Resource Conservation through Ecotourism.
18 Lee, Dong Kun and Bo Mi Kim(2010) Important-satisfaction analysis as a management strategy of Suncheon Bay Ecological Park. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 37(6): 39-47.
19 Maloney, M. P. and Ward, M. P.(1973) Ecology: Let's hear it from the people. An objective scale for measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist 28: 583-586.   DOI
20 Maloney, M. P., M. P. Ward and G. N. Braucht(1975) Psychology in action: a revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist 30: 787-790.   DOI
21 Maslow, A. H.(1954) Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
22 Maslow, A. H.(1970a) Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
23 Maslow, A. H.(1970b) Religions, Values and Peak Experiences. New York: Penguin. (Original work published 1964)
24 Meric, H. J. and J. Hunt.(1998) Ecotourists' motivational and demographic characteristics: a case of North Carolina travelers. Journal of Travel Research 36(4): 57-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Osborn, F.(1948) Our Plundered Planet. Boston: Little, Brown.
26 Roh, Yong Ho(2004) Determinant Factors of Ecotourisits' Satisfaction and Behavior Responses. Ph. D. Dissertation. KyungPook National University.
27 Seo, JeongWon(2005) AStudy on the Effect of Ecological Tour Visitor's Motive, Attitude, and Involvement on the Recognition of Tour Brand Value. Ph. D. Dissertation. KyungHee University.
28 Shostrom, E. L.(1973) Self-actualization: Ascientific ethic. The Counseling Psychologist 4: 29-35.   DOI
29 Stern, P. C.(1992) Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Annual Review of Psychology 43: 269-302.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Weigel, R. and J. Weigel(1978) Environmental concern: the development of a measure. Environment and Behavior 10: 3-15.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Weiler, B. and H. Richins(1995) Extreme, extravagant and elite: a profile of ecotourists on earthwatch expeditions. Tourism Recreation Research 20(1): 29-36.   DOI