Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.4.056

A Study on Urban Open Space Selection Attributes as an Urban Entertainment Destination  

Chae, Jin-Hae (Interdisciplinary Program of Landscape Architecture Major, Graduates School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Yong-Gook (Interdisciplinary Program of Landscape Architecture Major, Graduates School, Seoul National University)
Kim, Young-Hyun (Interdisciplinary Program of Landscape Architecture Major, Graduates School, Seoul National University)
Son, Yong-Hoon (Dept. of Environment Landscape Architecture, Graduates School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
Zoh, Kyung-Jin (Dept. of Environment Landscape Architecture, Graduates School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.41, no.4, 2013 , pp. 56-67 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper asks what the Selection Attributes of urban open space are which carries out a role as an Urban Entertainment Destination. Case studies have chosen the Cheonggyecheon Waterfront, Seoul Forest Park, Seonyudo Park and Banpo Hangang Park as the representative open spaces in Seoul. The methods of study are observation investigation, a literature investigation and the survey to 233 visitors that conducted the ANOVA analysis and Regression analysis by SPSS 18.0. As a result, first, the urban open space in Seoul has had 8 elements of UED; Landscape, Multi anchoring, Contextual links, Programmability, Community, Branded identity, Security and Service. Second, they are being used not the neighborhood type but a wide area type. Third, Landscape, Security and Service are most important while Programmability and Community are less important than other factors in EUOS factors. Lastly, it was analysed that the influential factor of revisitation and satisfaction is Landscape, which is the common factor. Security in revisitation and Contextual links in satisfaction are especially additional factors. The landscape property is an important element to make an Entertainment Urban Open Space(EUOS). The virtue of landscape in the EUOS relates not only park facility or program that installed in the place but also the overall mood involving park user's activities in the place. To be a successful EUOS, a park facility, program and the overall mood involving user's activities need to be integrative approach to enhance the virtue of landscape.
Keywords
Public Space; Park; Usage Behavior; Landscape;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 고귀환, 김정곤(2012) 현대도시에서 나타나는 상호작용 공간에 대한 연구: 시민과 상호작용하는 공간을 중심으로. 한국실내디자인학회논문집 21(5): 59.
2 문창현(2001) 이용만족도 결정요인의 분석을 통한 서울시 도시공원의 공간적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국지리환경교육학회지 9(1): 118-122.
3 문화체육관광부(2011) 2010 외래방문객 실태조사.
4 박경애(2004) 리테일 엔터테인먼트 요소에 대한 소비자 반응. 마케팅과학연구 14: 193-212.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
5 박수경, 박지혜, 차태훈(2007) 체험요소(4Es)가체험즐거움, 만족도, 재방문에 미치는 영향: Pine과 Gilmore의 체험 경제이론(Experience Economy) 을 중심으로. 광고연구 76: 55-78.
6 박찬돈, 박종백, 하재명(1997) 공동주택 녹지공간의 환경성능에 관한 연구. 국토계획학회지 32(1): 239-250.   과학기술학회마을
7 이상호(1997) 서울시 녹색네트워크 형성을 위한 녹지확충방안. 서울시정개발연구원.
8 이지영(2007) 도시오픈 스페이스의 확보와 정비. 월간 시민과 도시 12: 5-11.
9 임희지, 김상일, 김대성, 장경철, 정희윤 역(2006) 판매-엔터테인먼트 목적지개발. Beyard, Michael D., Raymond E. Braun, Herbert Mclaughlin, Patrick L. Phllips and Michael S. Rubin, Developing Retail Entertainment Destinations. 서울시정개발연구원.
10 Akkar, Muge(2005) Questioning the publicness of public spaces in postindustrial cities. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 14(2): 75-91.
11 Beyard, Michael D., Michael S. Rubin and Patrick Phillips(1998) Developing Urban Entertainment Centers. Washington D.C.: Urban Land Institute.
12 Brill, Louis M.(1998) Entertainment in the public realm. FunWorld June: 42-46.
13 Dunn, Scott(2007) Creating and sustaining thriving open space: Investing in people, place and ecology. 광교 명품 신도시 수변형 도시공원의 미래상 심포지엄 2.
14 Gehl, J.(1987) Life between Buildings. NewYork: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
15 Hudnut, William H.(1998) Downtown: Still the heart and soul of a region. Urban Land 57: 70-75.
16 Kay, Jane Holtz(1990) Entertainment. Landscape Architecture June 51-54.
17 Madanipour, Ali(2004) Marginal public spaces in European cities. Journal of Urban Design 9(3): 267-268.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Nicholls, S. and J. Crompton(2005) The impact of greenways on property values: Evidence from Austin, Texas. J. Leisure Res. 37, 321-341.
19 Rubin, Michael S. and Charles Bragitikos (2001) Destination development arrives. Urban Land 60: 40-49.
20 Steele, Fritz(1981) The Sense of Place. Boston: CBI Publishing Company, Inc.
21 Thompson, C. W.(2002) Urban open space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning. 60(2), 59-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 http://hangang.seoul.go.kr
23 Tofte, Shawn(2003) Urban Entertainment Destinations- A Developmental Approach for Urban Revitalization. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University.
24 ULI(2001) Ten Principles for Reinventing America's Suburban Strips. Urban Land Institute.
25 東京都建設局(2004) 東京が切り拓く新時代の公園経営を目指してパークマ ネジメントマスタープラン.東京都建設局.
26 http://parks.seoul.go.kr
27 http://parks.seoul.go.kr/template/default.jsp?park_id=seonyudo
28 http://www.cheonggyecheon.or.kr