Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.1.011

Analyzing Mutual Relationships Between Nectar Plants and Butterflies for Landscape Design - Focusing on World Cup Park, Seoul -  

Kim, Ji-Seok (L.E.T Landscape Architect Co., Ltd.)
Kang, Hyun-Kyung (Dept. of Environment Landscape Architecture, Sangmyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.39, no.1, 2011 , pp. 11-21 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this paper, in order to select specialist butterfly species that inhabit Haneul and Noeul Parks, previously landfill areas, we verified the reciprocal relationships between nectar plants and butterflies. While we will design the butterfly habitats, this paper will provide the foundation data for selecting the plants. The completed survey indicated that there were a total of 5 families, 23 species and 1,129 individuals. Butterflies of the main action were feeding on nectar, and such behavior was 36% of the total actions. Therefore, these parks play an important role in butterflies feeding on nectar. The correlation between butterflies and the nectar plants' color was not significant; Therefore, it is not necessary to consider flower color when choosing plants to attract the butterflies. In addition, butterflies prefer naturalized plants for feeding on nectar. Thus, when creating butterfly habitats, there is no use in attracting the butterflies by classifying the naturalized plants and native plants. However, if some areas that are need to plant native plants such as Inkigofera pseudo-tinctoria, Lespedeza bicolor, Aster koraiensis make use it, there could be taken an advantage to attract the butterflies. According to the algebraic curve model of curve estimation regression analysis, we were able to classify the generalist species and specialist species by regression analysis. As a result, Colias erate, Artogeia rapae and Parnara guttata were classified as generalist species, where as Rapala caerulea, Pieris melete, Zizera maha and Celastrina argiolus were classified as specialist species. Rapala caerulea prefers hills and forest for its habitat; therefore, it is clearly distinct from Pieris melete, Zizera maha and Celastrina argiolus which prefer grassland for habitats. These results show that Rapala caerulea is high conservation value in a landfill area where is developing ecological succession from grasslands to wood lands. In conclusion, these research are able to contribute to select the target species and suitable species that consider a singularity between butterflies and nectar plants, when we are creating the butterfly habitats, moreover these research will contribute to maintain a stable habitats.
Keywords
Generalist Species; Specialist Species; Regression Analysis; Habitats;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dennis, R. L. H., J. G. Hodgson, R. Grenyer, T. G. Shreeve and D. B. Roy(2004) Host plants and butterfly biology. Do host-plant strategies drive butterfly status?. Ecological Entomology 29: 12-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Dover, J. W.(1996) Factors affecting the distribution of satyrid butterflies on arable farmland. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 723-734.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Feber, R. E., Smith H. and D. W. MacDonald(1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1191-1205.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Goulson, D., J. Ollerton and S. Sluman(1997a) Foraging strategies in the small skipper butterfly . Thymelicus flavus: when to switch?. Animal Behaviour 53: 1009-1016.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Goulson. D., J. C. Staut and S. A. Hawson(1997b) Can flower constancy in nectaring butterflies be explained by Darwin's inter-ference hypothesis?. Oecologia 112: 225-231.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 May, P. G.(1985) Nectar uptake rates and optimal nectar concentrations of two butterfly species. Oecologia 66: 381-386.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Mori. W. and F. Yoichi(1985) A new Favonius species from the Korean Peninsula(Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Nature & Life 15(2): 33-46.
8 Pivnick, K. A. and J. N. McNeil(1985) Effects of nectar concentration on butterfly feeding: measured feeding rates for Thymelicus lineola(Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) and a general feeding model for adult Lepidoptera. Oecologia 66: 226-237.   DOI
9 Shreeve, T. G.(1992) Adult behaviour. In: Dennis, R. L. H.(Ed.). The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press. Oxford. pp. 22-45.
10 Steffan-Dewenter, I. and T. Tscharntke(2000) Butterfly community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecology Letters 3: 449-456.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Tudor, O., R. L. H. Dennis, J. N. Greatorex-Davies and T. H. Sparks(2004) Flower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern. Biological Conservation 119: 397-403.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Warren, M. S.(1987) The ecology and conservation of the heath fritillary butterfly , Mellicta athalia. III. Population dynamics and the effect of habitat management. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 499-513.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 이영로(1998) 한국식물도감. 서울: 교학사.
14 이창복(1980) 대한식물도감. 서울: 향문사.
15 정세호, 김원택(1998) 한국산 Narathurajaponica(Murray, 1875) 남방남색꼬리부전나비의 발견(나비목, 부전나비과). 제주생명과학연구 1(1): 73-75.
16 주흥재, 김성수, 손정달(1997) 한국의 나비. 서울: 교학사.
17 한국곤충학회, 한국응용곤충학회(1994) 한국곤충명집. 서울: 건국대학교출판부.
18 Blair, R. B.(1999) Birds and butterflie salong an urban gradient: Surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity?. Ecological Applications 9(1): 164-170.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Corbet, S. A.(1978) Bee visits and the nectar of Echium vulgare L. and Sinapis albaL. Ecological Entomology 3: 25-37.   DOI
20 Corbet, S. A.(2000) butterfly nectaring flowers: butterfly morphology and flower form. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 96: 289-298.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Dennis, R. L. H. and T. G. Shreeve(1997) Diversity of butterflies on British islands: ecological influences underlying the roles of area, isolation and the size of the faunal source. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 257-275.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 김도성, 조영복, 고재기(1999) 옥천군 지역의 붉은점모시나비(Pamassiusbremeri)의 소멸 원인과 복원 방안. 한국환경생물학회지 17(4): 467-479.
23 박수현(1994) 한국의 귀화식물에 관한 연구. 한국자연보존 85: 39-49.
24 김용식(2002) 원색한국나비도감. 서울: 교학사.
25 김창환(1984) 한국산 나비류와 그 식이식물의 분포에 관한 연구. 한국곤충연구소 연구보고 (10): 35-124.
26 문만용(1999) '조선적 생물학자' 석주명의 나비분류학. 한국과학사학회지 21(2): 157-193.
27 박수현(1995) 한국귀화식물원색도감. 서울: 일조각.
28 박수현(2001) 한국귀화식물원색도감 보유편. 서울: 일조각.
29 신유항(1974) 꼬리명주나비의 생활사에 관하여. 경희대학교 논문집 8: 319-325.
30 신유항, 이광원(1988) 한국산 나비의 흡밀식물에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 논문집 71: 247-262.
31 오홍규, 이영수, 이상계, 박형만, 최용석, 류갑희, 장영덕(2002) 줄점팔랑나비(Parnaraguttata)에 대한 몇 가지 살충제의 활성과 아치사농도에 의한 영향. 한국농약과학회지 6(4): 257-263.
32 이기열, 안기수, 박성규, 김태수, 최용석(2003) 벼줄점팔랑나비의 형태적 특징 및 생활사. 한국응용곤충학회지 42(4): 323-327.
33 이상태(1997) 한국식물검색집. 서울: 아카데미서적.
34 이영로(1975) 한국식물의 화색의 다양성에 대하여. 한국생활과학연구원 논총 16: 51-57.