Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.1.106

Earmarking the Areas in Which Wildlife Exist as "Ecologically Connected Areas Requiring Preferential Preservation"  

SaGong, Jung-Hee (Dept. of Environmental & Ecological Research, Chungnam Development Institute)
Ra, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University)
Chung, Ok-Sik (Dept. of Environmental & Ecological Research, Chungnam Development Institut)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.39, no.1, 2011 , pp. 106-116 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to find ecologically stable areas involving the locations in which wildlife exist, and to earmark those places as "ecologically connected areas requiring preferential preservation," and through that, to reduce the perils that may occur due to urban development or road construction. The processes and the results of this study were as follows: 1. Selecting the spots in which wildlife may exist: The total study areas were analyzed by eight ecological indexes and then a total of 500 locations in study areas were selected. 2. Sorting the locations in which mammals exist: We surveyed each one of the 500 locations twice, and then confirmed that we found mammals at 492 of the 500 locations and analyzed 264 locations that the number of existing mammals was above average. 3. Analyzing the 264 locations with two indexes, the number and the frequency of the land use types: 5~7 types of land use were suitable. The types were forest, rice field, farm, river, and meadow, excluding building and road. 4. Selecting the locations that meet the above conditions: We sorted 89 locations and earmarked these points as "ecologically connected areas requiring preferential preservation" in order to expect continued existence of wildlife.
Keywords
Ecological Indexes; Mammals; Urban Development; Road Construction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wilcove, D. S., C. H. McLellan, and P. Dobson(1986) Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zond. In: M. E. Soule(Editor), Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 237-256.
2 최태영, 박종화(2006) 이동통로가 늘어나면 야생동물 교통사고가 감소할 것인가?. 한국환경생태학회 학술대회지 2: 58-67.
3 한봉호, 김정호, 김종식(2005) 도심지역 산지형 근린공원내 도로에 의한 단절지역 생물이동통로 조성계획 연구: 동작구 노량진근린공원을 대상으로. 한국조경학회지 33(2): 16-31.
4 한상훈(2004) 야생동물이동통로의 문제점 평가분석 및 대책. 한국환경생태학회 학술대회지 1: 65-78.
5 Bamford, R.(1986) Broadleaved edges within conifer forest. The importance to birdlife. Quarterly Journal of Forestry 80: 115-121.
6 Blouin, M. S. and E. F. Connor(1985) Isthere a best shape for nature reserves?. Biological Conservation 32: 277-288.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Conner and, R. N. and C. S. Adkisson(1975) Effects of clear cutting on the diversity of breeding birds. Journal of Forestry 73: 781-785.
8 Davis, S. K.(2004) Area sensitivity in grassland passerines: Effect of parch size, patch shape and vegetation structure on bird abundance and occurrence in southern Saskatchewan. The Auk 121(4): 1130-1145.   DOI
9 Gates, J. E. and L. W. Gysel(1978) Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology 59: 871-883.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Harris, L. D.(1984) The Fragmented Forest. University of Chicago Press.
11 김귀곤, 최준영, 손삼기(2000) 단편화된 서식처의 연결을 위한 야생동물 이동통로의 조성. 한국조경학회지 28(1): 70-82.
12 민지홍, 한갑수(2010) 오대산국립공원의 야생동물 로드킬 특성. 한국환경생태학회지 24(1): 46-53.
13 이경재, 한봉호(2003) 도로개발에 의하여 훼손된 산림지역 생물이동통로 식재계획. 한국환경생태학회지 16(3): 321-337.
14 Nudds, T. D.(1977) Quantifying the vegetative structure of wildlife cover. Wildlife Society Bulletin 5: 113-117.
15 전익요, 한봉호, 홍석환, 이경재(2006) 의왕시 오봉산 육교형 생태 이동 통로 모니터링에 의한 관리 및 개선방안. 한국조경학회지 34(1): 10-20.
16 최병진, 조영석, 정종철, 김주필(2007) 야생동물 생태학적 사례연구를 통해서 본 교량형 생태통로의 현황 및 문제점. 환경영향평가 16(4): 285-300.
17 Karr, J. R. and Roland R. Roth(1971) Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several New World areas. American Naturalist 105: 423-435.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson(1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography(University, Princeton in Press).
19 Mazurek, M. J. and William J. Zielinski(2004) Individual legacy trees influence vertebrate wildlife diversity in commercial forests. Forest Ecology and Management 193(3): 321-334.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Opdam, P.(1991) Protecting natural areas in fragmented landscapes. Nat. Areas J 7: 2-13.
21 Scheller, R. M. and David J. Mladenoff(2008) Understory species patterns and diversity in old-growth and managed northern hardwood forests. Ecological Application 12: 1329-1343.
22 Strelke, W. K. and J. G. Dickson(1980) Effect of forest clear-cut edge on breeding birds in eastern Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 44: 559-567.   DOI