Browse > Article

The Influence of Landscape Painting Concepts on Garden Design Principles in East-Asia - Focused on the Relationship between Chinese Painting Theory and Garden Theory -  

Kim, Han-Bai (Dept. of Landcspe Architecture, University of Seoul)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.37, no.6, 2010 , pp. 85-95 More about this Journal
Abstract
East-Asian intellectual societies in the pre-modem age sustained a holistic system of poem-calligraphy-painting trinity until the coming of Western modernism. Therefore, it has been insisted that the principles of traditional landscape gardening were greatly influenced by those of landscape painting and related literature. This study examined those influences closely to discover the essence of traditional Asian landscape architecture through a comparative study between Chinese landscape painting theory and landscape gardening theory within the dual categories of 'contents(value and meaning)' and 'form(view and spatial structure)'. The most important theme of landscape painting theory in contents category was 'Chi and its Vitality(氣韻生動)'. The matching theme in landscape design field was 'Feng-Shui(風水)' and 'Yi-Jin'g(意境)'. The most important theme of landscape painting theory in formal category was 'the Three Ru1es of Perspective(三遠法)'. And the matching theme of landscape design theory was 'Yindi(因地)' and 'Jie-Jing(借景)'. The most important theme of landscape painting theory in formal category was 'the Three Rules of Perspective(三遠法)'. And the matching theme of landscape design theory was 'Yindi(因地)' and 'Jie-Jing(借景)'. It was found that themes and various principles of both fields were closely inter-related and have much in common in their representation of contents and form. In the close relationship with main art genres like this, the landscape gardening could have been recognized as one of the genres of fine art.
Keywords
Chinese Landscape Painting Theory; Asian Landscape Design Theory; Chi and its Vitality; Yi-Jing; Three Rules of Perspective;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김진영 편역(1984) 개자원화전. 한국화보 李漁 沈心友, 芥子園畵譜. 출판사미상.
2 김기주 역(1992) . 중국의 산수화. Sullivan. M., Symbols of Eternity 서울:문예출판사
3 김우창(2003) 풍경과 마음. 서울: 생각의 나무.
4 김종태 역(1989) 중국고대정원림의 분석. 彭一剛, 中國古典園林分析. 서울: 문화재관리국.
5 도올 김용옥 역주(1992) 石濤畵論, 石濤, 話語錄 서울: 통나무.
6 백윤수(2005) 원림론에 미친 화론의 영향, 미학 제 41 집 : 1-33
7 월간미술 엮음. 세계미술용어사전, 서울: 주)월간미술
8 이유직 (2000) 동양정원의 조원가와 이론서. 건축역사연구 9(3) : 92- 106.
9 전영옥 (2004), 조선시대 괴석의 특성과 산수화와의 관련성에 관한 연구. 한국전통조경학회지 22(2): 1-12.
10 홍형순(2008) 장주묘암도에 표현된 정원도해의 메타포. 한국전통조경학회지 26(1): 1-8.
11 近轉公夫역(1975) SAKU-TEI-KI 橋俊網作展記. National Woman's University of Nara. Institete of Environrnent Planning for Living
12 Appleton, Jay(1975) Experience of Landsιape. London. Johns Wiely and Sons.
13 Wu. Jiahua(1995) A Ccmparative Study of Landscape Aesthetics. Lewiston The Edwin Mellen Press
14 이진희(1995) 유토피아적 경관해석에 관한 연구. 한국정원학회지 13(1) 61-71
15 이유직(1997) 許成의 園治연구. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
16 Lee, Hang-Lyoul(2008) Trends of farnous garden masters between in the Late Ming and Early Qing Dynasties. Journal of Korean Traditional Landscape Architecture 26(6): 124-134
17 김정용 (1999) 중국의 회화이론과 원림건축사상 비교연구. 건축역사연구 8(2): 33-47.
18 허영환 역주(1989) 임천고치-곽희. 곽사의 산수화론. 郭熙, 林峊高致 서울. 열화당.
19 강관식 역(1991) 동양화구도론. 王伯敏. 中國畵的構圖. 서울: 미진사
20 김주석, 박한규(1989) 동양화와 동양건축의 연관성에 관한 연구. 대한 건축학회 학술발표논문집 9(1): 208-211
21 박은하 엮음(2001) 중국회화감상, 서울: 도서출판 예경.
22 Cheng. Francois(1994) Empty and Full-The Language of Chinese Painting. Boston and Laldon. Shambhala.
23 고연희 (2007) 조선시대 산수화. 서울: 도서출판 돌베개.
24 김성우, 안대회 역(1993) 計成 園治. 서울: 도서출판 예경.
25 김광석, 박길룡 (2004) 산수화의 시각구조와 도시풍경담기에 관한 연 구, 대한건축학회 학술발표논문집 24(1): 259-262
26 김기임, 윤홍택(1996) 예술분야에 나타난 조선시대 정원의 구성요소와 구성원리- 대한건축학회 학술발표논문집 16(2): 181-186
27 김영빈 역(1987) 中國底園論. 間大路, 대구: 중문출판사.
28 검성우(2005) 비례와 기운-동서양 건축의 심미성- 건축역사연구 14(2) 103-142
29 최종현 (2007) 원림건축 형식으로서의 한국전통산수화 고찰. 한국전통조경학회지 25(4) : 13-36.