Browse > Article

The Visual Preference for Damaged Mountainous Landscape  

Huh, Joon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture & Urban Design, Woosuk University)
Kim, Dae-Soo (Dept. of Urban Environment Landscape Architecture, Hyechon College)
Joo, Shin-Ha (Division of Environment and Life Science, Seoul Women's University)
Kim, Choong-Sik (Dept. of Environment Landscape Architecture, Kangnung University)
Ahn, Myung-Jne (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate school, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.35, no.4, 2007 , pp. 71-80 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to suggest the criteria for the damaged mountainous landscape based on the shape, location and ratio of damaged landscape. For the study, the preference and landscape adjectives were analyzed on visual images and simulations. The variables for analysis were the amount of the damaged ratio(10%, 30%, 50%), the location of the damage (upper, middle, lower) and the various forms of the damage(spot, line, area). According to the results of this study, in accordance with the amount of damage, the visual preference recorded its lowest with the a rate of 50%. As for the location of the damage, the lower-ridge of the mountain showed the highest preference, and the upper-ridge was recorded as the lowest. The linear damage type showed the highest preference. On the other hand, the spotted damage type showed lowest. The results indicate that the visual preference increases when there is a lower ratio of damage, as the damage locates at the lower-ridge, and also when there is a presence of linear formation development. The group of linear formation-the lower ridge-10% showed the highest preference, and the group of linear formation-the mid ridge-50% was the lowest with the results of 3-way ANOVA. The group of linear formation-lower ridge-10% in particular had virtually no differences of visual preference when it was compared with the original scene. The damage with the spotted formation, on the mid-upper location and the high ratio of damage were analyzed as factors that give negative influence on the mountainous landscape. The main features of mountainous landscape were reduced into two factors, 'total estimation' and 'spatial scale' by the factor analysis with total variance of 65.96%.
Keywords
Damaged Landscape; Ratio; Location; Shape; Visual Image;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 경기개발연구원(1998) 도시경관 개선방안에 관한 연구. 경기개발연구원
2 김충식(2004) 경관시율레이터를 이용한 건축제어요소가 가로경관에 미치는 영향분석. 서울시립대학교 박사학위논문
3 산림청(2004) 생활환경 보전림(경관림) 조성 관리 체계 연구(1년차). 산림청
4 산림청(2006a) 2006년도 산림과 임업 동향에 관한 연차보고서. 산림청
5 산림청(2006b) 산지경관 유지를 위한 산지전용제도 개선방안 연구. 산림청
6 주신하,임승빈(1998) 경관 시뮬레이션기법에 관한 연구,한국조경학회지 26(3): 312-320
7 Ribe. R. and Silvaggio,T. (2005) Aesthetic perceptions of green-tree retention harvests in vista views. Landscape and Urban Planning 73(4): 277-293   DOI   ScienceOn
8 蓧頂 修, 배현미 외 역(1999) 경관계획의 기초와 실제. 대우출판사
9 신지훈(1995) 경관영향평가를 위한 물리적 지표설정에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문
10 한국산지보전협회(2005a) 대규모 산지훼손지 실태조사,원인분석 및 지속가능한 산지보전을 위한 모니터링 방안. 한국산지보전협회
11 한국토지공사(1998) 산지개발 모형작성에 관한 연구. 한국토지공사
12 한국산지보전협회(2005b) 전국 산지훼손 모니터링사업 종합보고서. 한국산지보전협회
13 주신하,임승빈(2003) 도시경관분석을 위한 경관형용사 목록 작성, 한국조경학회지 31(1): 1-10
14 김기호(1996) 게쉬탈트 이론을 적용한 도시경관관리에 관한 연구. 국토계획 31(3): 143-157
15 김충식(2006) 부산 신항만 욕망산 경관계획,한국조경학회지 33(6) : 127-139   과학기술학회마을
16 한국조경학회(2004a) 자연경관계획 및 관리. 문운당
17 한국조경학회(2004b) 도시경관계획 및 관리. 문운당
18 산림청(2005) 생활환경 보전림(경관림) 조성 관리 체계 연구(2년차). 산림청
19 임승빈(1991) 경관분석론. 서울대학교 출판부