Browse > Article

Analysis of the Leisure Choice Attributes at Rural Area of Urban People  

Yun, Hee-Jeong (Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Im, Seung-Bin (Dept. of Landscape Architecture and Rural System Engineering, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.34, no.6, 2007 , pp. 66-77 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study intends to analyze urban peoples' leisure choice attributes of rural areas from a rural demand perspective. For this purpose, this study investigates regional attributes considered in decision making processes for rural tourism destinations of urban residents using a conjoint model as a stated preference model. Based on literature reviews, two questionnaire surveys were conducted. The first questionnaire survey was performed in 4 cities including Seoul, Daejeon, Suwon and Chuncheon with 408 urban residents. The Second questionnaire survey was performed in 5 cities including Seoul, Chuncheon, Daejeon, Jeonju and Busan with about 1,060 urban residents. The study results suggest that the most important attribute in selecting rural ares for tourism are activity programs and convenience of facility, according to part-worth and vector model. The fitness level of model is 0.986, which is very significant. Among the 5 attribute's levels, the rural residents' kindness, the traditional and the ecological programs and the facilities about sign and lodging are more critical factors than other levels. Utilities of each levels decreases as cost and arrival time increases. Regarding the result of market segmentations, respondents having intention to visit can be divided into 4 group; (1) facility or program oriented type, (2) resident's kindness oriented type, (3) arrival time oriented type, and (4) negatively participant type. The results of leisure choice attributes can provide insightful information for regional planning strategies, such as selection of the type of market segments and the key factor of facility and space planning.
Keywords
Rural Leisure; Rural Tourism; Market Segmentation of Rural Leisure;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김사헌(2003) 관광경제학. 서울: 백산출판사
2 농림부(2005) 농업, 농촌의 공익기능자원활용과 연계한 농촌관광 수요예측모형 개발
3 농촌자원개발연구소(2003) 녹잭관광 실태 및 선호도 조사. 수원: 농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원
4 조승국, 신철오(2005) 한강수질개선의 속성별 경제적 편익 : 컨조 인트 분석법을 이용하여. 자원 . 환경경제연구 14(3); 655-672
5 하영원, 김경미(1995) 양면적 광고에 있어 부정적 정보의 위치가 설득에 미치는 영향. 소비자학연구 6(2): 67-78
6 홍성권, 이용훈(2000) 주제공원 이용자들의 선택행동 연구. 한국조경학회지 28(2): 18-27
7 F1eischer, A. and A. Tchetcjik(2005) Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture? Tourism Management 26: 493-501   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Hogarth, R. M. and H. J. Einhorn(1992) Oder effects in belief updating: the belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology 24: 1-55   DOI
9 Kaplan, M.(1960) Leisure: Theory and policy. New York: John Wiley & Sons
10 Kelly, J., W. Haider, P. W. Williams, and K. Englund(2007) Stated preferences of tourists for eco-efficient destination planning options. Tourism Management (in press)
11 Suh, Y. K. and L. McAvoy (2005) Preferences and trip expenditures: a conjoint analysis of visitors to Seoul, Korea. Tourism Management 26: 325-333   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Hong, S., S. Kim, and J. Kim(2003) Implications of potential green tourism development, Annals of Tourism Research 30(2): 323-341   DOI   ScienceOn
13 허명희(2006) SPSS 컨조인트 분석. 서울: 한국 SPSS
14 Ashton, A. H. and R. H. Ashton (1988) Sequential belief revision in auditing. The Accounting Review 63(4): 623-641
15 Green, P. E. and V. Srinivasan(1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing 54: 3-19   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Tubbs, R. M.. W. F. Messier, and W. Knechel(1990) Recency effects in the auditor's belief-revision prooess. The Accounting Review 65(2): 452-460
17 Goossen, M. and F. Langers(2000) Assessing quality of rural areas in the Netherlands: finding the most important indicators for recreation. Landscape and Urban Planning 46: 241-251   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Baird J. E. and R. C. Zelin(2000) The effects of information ordering on investor perceptions: an experiment utilizing president's letters. Journal of Financial and strategic Decisions 13(3): 71-80
19 Green, P. E. and V. Srinivasan (1978) Conoint analysis in consumer research: issue and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research 5: 103-123   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Unwin, T.(1996) Tourist development in Estonia: images, sustainability and integrated rural development. Tourism Management 4: 265-276
21 Murphy, A. and P. W. Williams(1999) Attracting Japanese tourists into the rural hinterland: implications for rural development and planning. Tourism Management 20: 487-499   DOI   ScienceOn
22 UNWTO(2006) Updating Tourism Statistics International Standards: First Set of Changes and Amendments. Madrid: UNWTO
23 Alba, J. W., J. W. Hutchinson. and J. G. Lynch Jr.(1991) Memory and decision making. In T. Robertson and H. Kassarjian, eds., Handbook of Consumer Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pp, 1-49
24 김남조(2004) 농촌어메니티 개념과 관광현상 구성요소를 이용한 농촌관광정책의 방향. 관광학연구 28(1): 263-281
25 Asare, S.(1992) The auditor's going-concern decision: interaction of task variables and the sequential processing of evidence. The Accounting Review 67(2): 379-393
26 OECD(2000) Valuing Rural Amenities
27 Wittink, D. R. and P. Cattin (1989) Commercial use of conpint analysis: an update. Journal of Marketing 53: 91-96   DOI   ScienceOn
28 김성진, 안건용(1995) 소비자선돼행동 모형화: 선택이론/모델의 검토와 적용. 한국조경학회지 23(3): 59-68
29 박덕병, 이민수, 김정섭(2004) 농촌관광 시장 세분화 연구. 관광학연구 28(2): 193-212
30 이광익(1996) 농촌방문의 경제적 편익 추정 여행비용법의 활용. 농촌경제연구 37: 147-159
31 한국농촌경제연구원(2005) 농촌관광 수요확대 방안 연구
32 유필화(1997) 현대의 마케팅과학, 서울: 법문사
33 McGehee. N. G., K. Kim, and G. R. Jennings(2007) Gender and motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship. Tourism Management 28: 280-289   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Riddick, C. C.(1986) Leisure satisfaction precursors. Journal of Leisure Research 18(4): 259-265   DOI
35 윤희정, 김혜민(2006) CRM을 이용한 친환경농업의 경관가치 평가. 한국조경학회지 34(1): 37-47   과학기술학회마을
36 Ragheb, M. G.( 1980) Interrelationships among leisure participation, leisure satisfaction and leisure attitudes. Journal of Leisure Research 12(1): 138-149   DOI
37 Wu, B. and L. A. Cai(2006) Spatial modeling: suburban leisure in Shanghai. Annals of Tourism Research 33(1): 179-198   DOI   ScienceOn
38 김현, 이희찬(2004) 농촌관광 수요모형 연구. 관광학연구 19(2) : 131-146
39 농림부(2003) 우리나라 농촌관광 발전 방향 및 방안
40 조화준(1993) 정보의 제시순서가 회계감사인의 내부통제위험 판단에 미치는 영향. 회계학연구 16: 383-409
41 Sharpley, R. (2002) Rural tourism and the challenge of tourism diversification: the case of Cyprus. Tourism Management 23: 233-244   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Pina, I. P. A and M T. D. Delfa(2005) Rural tourism demand by type of accommodation. Tourism Management 26: 951-959   DOI   ScienceOn
43 농촌자원개발연구소(2004b) 지속가능한 농촌지역 개발을 위한 환경자원의 가치평가. 수원: 농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원
44 Kotri, A. (2006) Analyzing customer value using conjoint analysis: the example of packaging company. Faculty of Economics & Business Administration Working Paper Series 46: 3-33
45 국토연구원(2002) 레져행태 변화와 여가공간 조성방안 연구
46 Haugtvedt, C. P. and D. T. Wegener (1994) Messsge order effects in persuasion: an attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research 21: 205-218   DOI   ScienceOn
47 httpt/zwww.go.2vil.org
48 김정근(1998) 여가태도, 여가활동이 여가만족에 미치는 영향 -레캡의 연구모형 적용을 중심으로-. 관광학연구 21(2) : 222-236
49 농촌자원개발연구소(2004a) 농촌관광 실태 및 선호도 조사 연구. 수원: 농촌진흥청 농업과학기술원
50 홍성권(2000) Conjoint Choice Mcxiel을 이용자들의 선택행동 연구. 한국조경학회지 28(1): 19-28
51 윤희정, 임승빈(2006) 옥외여기공간의 다중감각 선호 및 이미지 영향력 분석. 한국조경학회지 34(3): 23-31   과학기술학회마을
52 대한국토 . 도시계획학회(2006) 농촌계획의 이론과 실제. 서울: 보성각
53 Seddighi, H. R., M. W. Nuttall, and A. L. Theocharous(2001) Does cultural background of tourists influence the destination choice': an empirical study with special reference to political instability. Tourism Management 22: 181-191   DOI   ScienceOn
54 Dellaert, B., A. Eorgers, and H. Timrnermans(1995) A day in the city: using conjoint choice experiments to model urban tourists' choice of activity packages. Tourism Management 16(5): 347-353   DOI   ScienceOn
55 Mazanec, J. A.(2001) Tourists' acceptance of Euro pricing: conjoint measurement with random coefficients. Tourism Management 23: 245-253