Browse > Article

Visual Preference of the Methods for River Embankment - The Case of Dongchon in Gwangyang -  

Lee Sang-Suk (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Sunchon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.34, no.3, 2006 , pp. 12-22 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate visual preferences of the methods for river embankment based on seasonal changes and to reveal the relationship between visual preference and effective factors, which are the physical and esthetic elements inside the river. For this research seven river embankment methods including concrete block, concrete wall, gabion, and vegetated concrete block were selected in Dongchon of Gwangyang. Twenty-eight pictures by the four pictures of each embankment method based on seasonal changes, the winter and summer of the first and second years after construction were used for a photo-questionnaire by 49 participants. In the analysis of the relationship between visual preference and effective factors, the independent variables included eight factors: form of the material, harmony with the surroundings, the cleanness of river floor, the green area of embankment methods, the water area in river floor, the stone and sand area in river floor, the planting area in river floor, and the area of embankment itself. The result of this study are as follows. First, visual preference in summer was higher than in winter, and the summer landscape of the second you scored the highest value for visual preference. Second, similarly to the way the vegetated concrete block produced a green effect, cobblestone and gabion embankments made of natural materials scored higher than others, whereas the concrete retaining wall scored the lowest of all methods because of it's artificiality. Third, the seven independent variables, except form of the material, are proved statistically significant at the 5% level. The water area in river floor, harmony with the surroundings, the planting area in river floor, and the cleanness of the river floor were revealed as more effective factors influencing visual preference. The research results suggest that the riverscape has to be controlled in terms of seasonal change and embankment methods. Natural materials and green effects in embankment methods are more important for increasing landscape preference, and the landscape factors inside a river should also be considered important variables. It is recommended that advanced study on other factors affecting visual preference of the riverscape be carried out to support this research.
Keywords
River Floor; Green Effect; Seasonal Change; Riverscape; Natural Material;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 서주환, 최현상, 차정운(2002) 서울시 한강교량 주야간 경관 이미지 분석. 한국조경학회지 30(5): 31-38
2 최형덕(2004) 자연형 하천호안공법의 적용후 평가. 한양대학교 도시대학원 석사학위논문
3 홍경구, 안건혁(2003) 하천변 주거지경관에 대한 인지유형별 시각적 영향 요인 분석. 대한국토.도시계획학회지 38(4): 159-170
4 Kitamura, S., T. Sato, and E. G. Johnson(1994) The influence of materials on landscape evaluation. International Association for People-Environment Studies 13: 21-30
5 Ryan, R. L.(1998) Local perceptions and values for a midwestern river corridor. Landscape and Urban Planning 42(2-4): 225-237   DOI   ScienceOn
6 김성근, 조우현, 임승빈(1999) 시각적 선호요인 분석을 통한 농촌 소하천 경관평가에 관한 연구. 농촌계획학회지 5(1) 35-44
7 Debarry, P. A.(2004) Watersheds: Processes, Assessment. and Management. Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
8 이상수, 안성식, 김진홍(2002) 자연친화적 하천정비공법적용의 모니터링과 타당성 검토. 중앙대학교 건설환경연구소 환경과학 연구 13(2): 1-14
9 광양시(2003) 수해복구사업 추진 현황보고(미발표)
10 진회성, 서주환(1988) 교량을 중심으로 한 한강경관의 시각적 선호도에 관한 연구. The Journal of landscape Architectural Studies of Kyung Hee University 1(1): 1-23
11 이학식, 김영(2005) SPSS12.0 매뉴얼(통계분석방법 및 해설). 서울: 법문사
12 Herzog, T. R.(1985) A cognitive analysis of preference for waterscapes. Journal of Environmental Psychology 5: 225-241   DOI
13 김용수, 김수봉(1998) 도시하천경관의 시각적 선호도와 이미지에 대한 연구. 대한국토.도시계획학회지 33(6): 243-254
14 박문후, 이상석, 양진희(1996) 역사적 변천을 통해서 본 서울시 지천의 현대적 활용방안. 서울학연구 7: 99-126
15 김대현, 김대수(1999) 도시 소하천 경관의 시각적 선호 이미지와 영향요인. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 2(5): 9-15
16 福岡捷二(1993) 生態系の保全.創出と治水の調和を目指して. 土木技術 18(2): 24-25