Browse > Article

A Hybrid Tendency of Contemporary Landscape Design  

Jang Il-Young (Industrial Science Research Institute, Cheongju University)
Kim Jin-Seon (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.34, no.2, 2006 , pp. 80-98 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study originated from following questions. What can we understand the conception of deconstruction, which has been the core idea of new discourses developed in various ways since modernism? How can this question be interpreted in landscape design? What is the conceptional frame of integration the prominent hybrid post-genre movements and phenomena? The frame can be epitomized with the deconstruction phenomenon. 'Deconstruction' is the core conception appeared in late or post-modern ages in the embodiment of modernity and can be viewed as an integrating or a hybrid phenomenon between areas or genres in formative arts. Therefore, the author regards the hybrid movements widely witnessed in the post contemporary formative arts as one of the most important indicators of de-constructive signs. It is safe to say that the phenomenon of this integration or hybridism, of course, does not threaten the identity of landscape design but serves as an opportunity to extend the areas of landscape design. One of the consequences of this integration or hybridism is the voluntary participation of users who have been alienated in the production of the meanings of design works and hybrid landscape design with the hybridization of genres that is characterized with transformation in forms. This view is based on the distinction between hybridization of interactions between the designer (the subject) and the user (the object), and hybridization of synesthesia. Generally speaking, this is an act of destroying boundaries of the daily life and arts. At the same time, it corresponds to vanishing of modern aesthetics and emerging of post-contemporary aesthetics which is a new aesthetic category like sublimeness. This types of landscape design tries to restore humans' sensibility and perceptions restrained by rationality and recognition in previous approach and to express non-materialistic characteristics with precaution against excessive materialism in the modern era. In light of these backgrounds, the study aims to suggest the hybrid concept and to explorer a new landscape design approach with this concept, in order to change the design structure from 'completed' or 'closed' toward 'opened' and to understand the characteristics of interactions between users and designs. This new approach is expected to create an open-space integrating complexity and dynamics of users. At the same time, it emphasizes senses of user' body with synesthesia and non-determination. The focus is placed on user participation and sublimity rather than on aesthetic beauty, which kind of experience is called simulacre. By attaching importance to user participation, the work got free from the material characteristics, and acceptance from the old practice of simple perception and contemplation. The boundaries between the subject and object and the beautiful and ordinary, from the perspective of this approach, are vanished. Now everything ordinary can become an artistic work. Western dichotomy and discrimination is not effective any more. And there is 'de-construction' where there is perfect equality between ordinary daily life and beautiful arts. Thus today's landscape design pays attention to the user and uses newly perceived sensitivity by pursing obscure and unfamiliar things rather than aesthetic beauty. Space is accordingly defined to take place accidentally as happening and event, not as volume of shape. It's the true way to express spatiality of landscape design. That's an attempt to reject conventional concepts about forms and space, which served as the basis for landscape design, and to search for new things.
Keywords
Deconstruction; Synesthesia; Non-determination; Simulacre; Sublime;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김한배(2005) 포스트모던 조경설계의 다원적 전개 양상. 한국조경학회지 32(6): 68-81   과학기술학회마을
2 이준석. 임동연(2001) 랩 쿨하스 작품에 나타난 개방적 프로그램의 생성 특징. 한국디자인학회지 17(9): 145-154
3 이진경 (2002) 노마디즘. 서울: 휴머니스트
4 Koolhaas, R. (1985) Imaging Nothingness in S. M. L. XL. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers
5 Lootsma, B. (1995) Adriaan Geuze: West8 Landscape Architects. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers
6 Reed, P. (2005) Groundswell. New York: The Museum of Modem Art
7 Robertshafer(2000) 독일 조경에서 자연의 의미, 환경과 조경 145: 64-71
8 김정호(2004) 공간과 도시의 의미들: 사건의 철학과 조경설계. 서울: 소명출판사
9 권영걸(2001) 공간디자인 16강. 서울: 도서출판 국제
10 여상헌 (2001) 랩 콜하스의 도시와 건축에 대한 리좀적 특성에 관한 연구. 인하대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
11 이석혼, 황기원(1997) 장소와 장소성의 다의적 개념에 관한 연구. 대한국토개발 32(5): 169-184
12 이영철 (1999) 21세기 문화 미리 보기. 서울: 시각과 언어
13 Noever, P. (1991) Architecture in Transition: between Deconstruction and New Modernism Munich: Prestel-Verlag
14 Koolhaas, R. (2001) Toward the Contemporary City in Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture. Princeton: Architectural Press
15 Crary, J. (199l) Techniques of the Observer: on Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: MIT Press
16 선근혜(2004) 환경설계의 다이어그램적 설계사고에 관한 연구. 서울시립대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
17 송석호(2003) 현대조경과 건축의 하이브리드 설계 방법 연구. 서울시립대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
18 Baudrillard, J. (1984) The Precession of Simulacre. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art
19 엄기홍(1997) 후기현대미술의 해체적 이미지와 그 특성 연구. 청예논총 13: 165-190
20 Geuze, A. (1993) Modem Park Design. Amsterdam: THOTH
21 Tschumi. B.(1994) Architecture and Disjunction. Cambridge: MIT Press
22 박정욱(2001) 우리시대의 설계언어: 프랑스 (20). 환경과 조경 157: 56-61
23 Allen, G. (2000) Intertextuality. London: Routledge
24 Lyotard, J. F.(1995) La Condition Postmodeme. 유정완, 이삼출, 민승기9역), 포스트모던의 조건. 서울: 민음사
25 Tschumi, B.(2002) Architecture and Disjunction. 류호창. 서정연(역), 건축과 해제. 서울: 시공
26 Steinglass. M.(2000) The Machine in ter Gsrden. Metropolis 20(2): 126-131
27 정정호 (1997) 탈근대 인식론과 생태학적 상상력. 서울: 한신문화사
28 배정한(2004) 현대 조경설계의 이론과 쟁점. 서울: 도서출판조경
29 김연금, 김대용(2001) 현대조경작가연구III. 서울: 누리에
30 Fry, E. F. (1992) Cubism. 김인환(역), 큐비즘. 서울: 미진사
31 Amidon (2001) Radical Landscapes. London: Thames & Hudson
32 최학종 (2004) MVRDV 건축읽기 서울: 시공문화사
33 Wolfgang, W.(2001) Unsere postmodeme Moder. 박민수(역). 우리의 포스트모던적 모던. 서울: 책세상출판사
34 길성호(2003) 수용미학과 현대건축. 서울: 시공문화사
35 김상숙(2004) 공간과 도시의 의미들: 장소와 작품. 서울: 소명출판사
36 박윤진, 김정융(2001) Personality: Conversation with Adriaan Geuze I. 환경과 조경 159: 110-115
37 배정한(2001b) 변신을 꿈꾸는 공원. 환경과 조경 159: 82-87
38 김정호(2002) 사건의 특성으로 본 외부 공간 해석 방법. 서울 시립대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
39 배정한(2001a) 다운스뷰 파크 국제설계경기를 통해 본 조경 설계의 새로운 전략. 한국조경학회지 29(6): 62-71
40 이정우(2003) 사건의 철학. 서울: 철학아카데미
41 De Sola Morales. R. I. (2004) Differencer. 이종건(역), 차이들. 서울: 시공문화사
42 배정한(2002) 공감각의 조경미학. 환경과 조경 166: 80-85