Browse > Article

Evaluating the Value of Environment-Friendly Agricultural Landscapes Using CRM  

Yun Hee-Jeong (Graduate School, Seoul National University)
Kim Hye-Min (Rural Resources Development Institute, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.34, no.1, 2006 , pp. 37-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
Environment-friendly agriculture has not only the simple purpose producing foods but also the key roles of conserving rural environments, landscapes and sustainable land uses. In addition, environment-friendly agricultural areas and their landscapes are important factors representing uniqueness of rural areas. For these reasons, this study investigates the landscapes formed through environment-friendly agriculture and evaluates the economic values of the landscapes using CRM(contingent ranking method) which has been known as one of the practical methods in the field of environmental economics. Based upon a scenario that government introduces the ratio of environment-friendly agriculture to evaluate economic values, a survey was performed with 1,088 of rural residents throughout the country. The results of this study indicate that the economic value for conservation and maintenance of environment-friendly agriculture landscapes is 480 won per household/month/1% environment-friendly agriculture, and this can be converted into 829 hundred million won per 1% environment-friendly agriculture nationally.
Keywords
Rural Landscape; Economic Value; Value Evaluation; Environmental Goods;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 권오상(1999) 환경경제학, 서울: 박영사
2 권오상(2000) 가상순위결정법을 이용한 자연생태계의 경제적 가치평가, 경제학연구 48(3): 177-196
3 농림부(2001) 농업의 다원적 기능의 가치평가 연구. 한국농촌경제연구원
4 서동균(2001) 농업의 다원적 기능 연구와 평가사례. 농촌진흥청 농업경영자료 63
5 신영철(1997) 이중 양분선택형 질문 CVM을 이용한 한강수질 개선 편익측정. 자원 . 환경경제연구 6(1): 171-192
6 조순재, 윤희정, 김혜민(2004) CVM을 통한 농촌 어메니티 자원의 보전가치평가, 대한국토 . 도시계획학회지 39(5): 189-198
7 Halstead, N. M.(1984) Measuring the nonrnarket value of Massachusetts agricultural land : a case study. Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council 13: 12-18   DOI
8 Lareau, T. J. and D. A. Rae(1989) Valuing WTP for diesel odor reduction: an application of contingent ranking technique. Southern Economic Journal 55: 728-742   DOI   ScienceOn
9 김병준(1997) 조건부가치측정법을 이용한 편익의 측정. 서울대학교 경제학부 석사학위논문
10 김태유(1998) CVM을 이용한 수돗물 공급신뢰도 개선의 가치 측정. 서울대학교 자원공학과 석사학위논문
11 OECD(2000) Valuing Rural Amenities. Paris: OECD
12 구소연(1998) 조건부가치측정법에 의한 관광자원의 가치추정. 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문
13 김동일(2001) 조건부가치측정모형의 최소절대편차추정. 자원 . 환경경제연구 10(4): 515-545
14 농림부 친환경농업과(2005b) 친환경농업 육성정책. 농림부
15 Garrod, G. D. and K. G. Willis(1997) The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: a contingent ranking study. Ecological Economics 21: 45-61   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Mander, U., M. Mikk, and M. Kulvik(1999) Ecological and low intensity agriculture as contributors to landscape and biological diversity. Landscape and Urban Planning 46: 169-177   DOI   ScienceOn
17 유승훈, 곽승준, 김태유(1999) 서울시 대기질 속성의 가치측정. 자원 . 환경경제연구 7(2): 243-270
18 윤태연(2003) 논의 경관기능에 대한 경제적 가치평가, 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
19 농림부 친환경농업과(2005a) 광역친환경농업단지 사업희망지역 조사표 및 사업계획서, 농림부
20 Bergstrom, J. C., B. L. Dillman, and J. R. Stoll(1985) Public environmental amenity benefits of private land: the case of prime agricultural land. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 17: 139-149
21 OECD(2001) Multifunctionality: Towards an Analytical Framework, Paris: OECD