Browse > Article

A Study on Framing Techniques of Landscape Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process - The Assessment on the Landscape Control Points -  

Suh Joo-Hwan (College of Art & Design, Kyung-Hee University)
Yang Hee-Seung (Dept. Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyung-Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.32, no.4, 2004 , pp. 94-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study creates the LCP (Landscape Control Point) through the survey of spot sites for the quality of landscape assessment, which is based on an objective and departmentalized data base; the landscape assessment was achieved by production of weight value with the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique, selection of requisites for the landscape assessment with the IVERSON method and visual area analysis with GIS (Geographic Information System). Futhermore, validity of the landscape assessment was verified by analysis of the correlation between physical amount and aesthetic amount. The purpose of this study is to suggest the basic essential data for landscape assessment and landscape planning by the characteristics of landscape based on verification of the suggested landscape assessment methods. The results of this study are summarized below. 1. In the adaptation of landscape assessment using GIS, the landscape assessment points of LCP 18, 17 and 16, which have more visible elements such as hill area, mountain area, and forest and farm land, were indicated to be higher than the others. In contrast, the landscape assessment points of LCP 13, 6 and 10, which have less visible elements, were relatively lower than the others. 2. In the visible preference measuring method, LCP 4, 14, and 16 showed high points of landscape assessment with 3.46, 3.4, and 3.18 each. With the more natural environments such as hill area, mountain area, and forest and farm land, higher results were shown. In contrast, LCP 7, 1, and 9 showed low points of landscape assessment with 2.24, 2.36, and 2.53 each. 3. In this study, a coefficient of 0.746 was gained by the analysis of correlation between the points of landscape assessment method and the points of visual preference from a slide show. This has 99 percent of probability in statistical data. 4. In conclusion, with the demonstration of the correlation between the landscape assessment method based on the AHP technique and the aesthetic amount (preference proportion), the practical use of landscape assessment can be demonstrated by the suggested landscape assessment method.
Keywords
The Landscape Assessment; AHP; LCP; The Visible Preference; Weight;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김성균 (1995) 도시주변 산의 경관보전 및 관리를 위한 GIS의 이용. 한국GIS학회지 3(2): 123-134   과학기술학회마을
2 김성희 (1999) 의사결정분석 및 응용. 서울: 영지문화사
3 서울특별시 (1980) 서부시민 휴식공원 개발기본계획(일영)
4 윤재남 (1999) 효율적 경관관리를 위한 경관평가에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
5 Saaty, T. L.(1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw
6 Shinohara Oshamu(1984) 新體系土木大系 (59土木景觀計劃). Kibou press.
7 남광우 (1998) 퍼지집합개념과 AHP를 이용한 GIS 환경에서의 공간의사결정에 관한 연구. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
8 김태형 (2002) GIS환경에서 GRID와 AHP를 이용한 Geoprocessing에 관한 연구. 부산대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
9 문경도 (1989) 고층건물의 경관영향평가방법 에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
10 Ross, R. T.(1939) Optimal orders in the method of paired comparisons. Journal of Experiment Psychology. 25: 414-424   DOI
11 임승빈 (1991) 경관분석론. 서울대학교 출판부
12 조규현 (2001) 도시공원 입지선정을 위한 GIS 기반의 의사결정 지원시스템 개발. 서울시립대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
13 최현상 (1998) 토지이용변화에 따른 농촌경관선호예측모델 설정에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
14 김상범 (1998) GIS를 활용한 경관평가에 관한 연구. 경희대학교 석사학위논문
15 Iverson. W. D.(1975) 'Assessing Landscape Resources: A Proposed Model' Landscape Assessment: Value, Perception. and Resources. Community Development series