Browse > Article

Environment Friendly Urban Open Space Planning - Enhancing the Connectivity of Habitats in Seoul, Korea -  

안동만 (서울대학교 조경학과)
김명수 (서울대학교 조경학과)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.31, no.1, 2003 , pp. 34-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
Connectivity is a quantitative indicator of landscape structure, and connectivity of urban green areas is an indicator of ecological integrity in urban landscapes. The purposes of this study are to assess the connectivity of urban green areas in Seoul, and to develop a method of siting new green areas for better connectivity. Diverse methods for connectivity assessment and indices of connectivity are reviewed and applied to the connectivity assesment of green areas in Seoul. The indices of connectivity of green areas in Seoul turned out to be higher than expected, maybe because many of them are rather evenly distributed, serving as stepping stones, and because there are many riparian corridors, including the Han River. Analysis also shows the optimum location of new green space patches or corridors will be those spots that would link the mainland, or large green areas outside the city, and existing green areas in the city. Restoration of urban streams as ecological corridors will significantly enhance connectivity. Three different scenarios with increasing numbers of new green areas in the city were then prepared. The changes of connectivity were measured and the possible success rates of animal dispersal were simulated. The results revealed that restoration of streams will increase the connectivity and success rates of animal dispersal.
Keywords
Landscape Ecology; Urban Green Space; Connectivity($\alpha,\; \beta,\; \gamma$ index, dispersion, isolation); Patch; Corridor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Gustafson. E. J. and R. H. Gardner(1996) The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probabihty of Patch Colonization. Ecology 77(1) : 94-107
2 With. K. A.. S. J. Cadaret. and C. Davis(1999) Movement Responses to Patch Structure in Expehmental Fractal Landscapes. Ecology 80(4) : 1340-1353   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Andren. H.(1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat : a review. OIKOS 71(3) : 355-366   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Dooley. J. L. and M. Bowers(1998) DemograPhic Responses to Habitat Fragmentation : Experimental Test at the Landscape and Patch Scale. Ecology 79(3) : 969-980   DOI   ScienceOn
5 김명수(2001) 파편화된 서식처 복원을 위한 기초 이론 고찰. 한국환경복원녹화기술학회지 4(2) :52-61
6 Forman. R T. T.(1995) Land Mosaic : The Ecoloey of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge(UK), Cambndge University Press : 68-72
7 Pickett. S. T. A. and P. S. White (eds.)(1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. San Diego. Academic Press
8 Haddad. Nick M.(1999) Corridor Use Predicted form Behaviors at Habitat Boundaiies. The Amencan Naturalist 153(2) : 215-227   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Mladenoff, David J. and Barry DeZonia(2001) APACK 2.17(Ana1ysis Software) User's Guide
10 Bowne. D. R.. J. D. Peles and G.W. Barrett(1999) Effect of Ladscape Spatial Structure on Movement Patterns of the Hispid Cotton Rat. LandscaPe Ecology 14 : 53-66   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Turchin. P.(1996) Fractal Analysis of Animal Movement :A Critique. Ecology 77(7) : 2086   DOI   ScienceOn
12 김명수. 안동만(1996) 도시공원의 경관생태학적 분석 : 경관조각의 형태지수와 분산도 분석을 중심으로. 한국조경학회지23(4) :12-19
13 Hawkins, V. and P. Selman(1994) Landscape Ecological Plannmg and the Future Countryside : A Research Note. Landscape Research 19(2) : 88-94   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Fahrig. L. and G. Memiam(1985) Habitat patch Connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66 : 1762-1768   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Forman. R. T. T. and M. Godron(1986) Landscape Ecology. New York. John Wiley and Sons
16 Kohn. D. D. and D. M. Wa1sh(1994) Plant species richness :the effect of island size and habitat diversity. J. of Ecology 82: 367 -377   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Brooker. L. M. Brooker and P. Ca1e(1999) Ammal Dispersal in Fragmented Habitat: Measunng the Habitat Connectivity, Cornidor Use, and Dispersa] Mortahty : Conservation Ecology http://www.consecol. org/ vol3/ issl
18 Hess, G. and R. A. Fisher(2001) Communicatmg Clearly about Conservation Comdors. Landscape and Urban P1anning 55: 195-208   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Pirnat. J.(2000) Conservation and Management of Forest Patches and Comdors in Suburban Landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 52 : 135-143   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Schumaker. N. H.(1996) Using Landscape Indices to Predict Habitat Connectivity. Ecoloey 77(4) : 1210-1225   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Jaarsma, C. F. and G. P. A. Willems(2002) Reducing Habitat Fragmentation by Minor Rural Roads through Traffic Calminng. Landscape and Urban Planning 58 : 125-135   DOI   ScienceOn