Browse > Article

New Strategies for Contemporary Landscape Design -Downsview Park International Design Competition and Its Implications-  

배정한 (단국대학교 환경조경학전공)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture / v.29, no.6, 2002 , pp. 62-71 More about this Journal
Abstract
How parks are to be made in the twenty-first century should certainly be different. This is the inevitable conclusion of the recent significant international design competition for Downsview Park in Toronto, 2000. The purpose of this critical study is to investigate new strategies for urban park design manifested in the proposals of that competition and to explore alternative ways of landscape design that could solve the recent crisis of urban parks. Tree City, the winning entry, and other final entries proclaim that city is park and park is city. In this sense, Downsview Park marks the end of traditional Olmstedian parks and the dichotomy between city(culture) and park(nature). Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau's Tree City will become the model for urban park design in the near future. There are three reasons for this. First, its design is a strategy rather than a form. We can interpret that Tree City is to be developed over time as directed by six strategies: grow the park, manufacture nature, 1000 pathways, sacrifice and save, curate culture, destination and dispersal. Second, it places faith in landscape as a revenue generator instead of a fiscal liability. Third, its implementation is possible with crude installation, requiring virtually no craft. Koolhaas and Mau intend for Downsview to be an environment that is never actually designed but is formed through natural succession, cultural action, and programmatical insertions. Rather than designed objects and formal solutions, their strategy is to allow the landscape to evolve with changing uses.
Keywords
Urban Park Design; Downsview Park; Landscape Strategy; Rem Koolhaas; Tree City;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Do We Still Need Parks? /
[ Ophuis, H. ] / Topos
2 라빌레뜨공원에 관하여 알고 싶은 두 세가지 것들 /
[ 조경진 ] / Locus
3 What Ever Happened to Urbanism? /
[ Koolhaas, R. ] / S. M. L. XL
4 Paris as a Laboratory for the Park of the 21st Century /
[ Baljon, L. ] / Topos
5 Why We Are Not Rem Koolhaas /
[ Keeney, G. ] / Serious Real - The Anti-Journal 1:1
6 Tree City: Proposal for Downsview Park. Tronto. 2000 /
[ Mau, B. ] / Life Style
7 Park=City? : The Downsview Park Design Competition /
[ Waldheim, C. ] / Landscape Architecture
8 Toward an Art of Infrastructure in the Theory and Practice of Contemporary Landscape Architecture /
[ Weller, R. ] / The Keynote Address delivered at the MESH Conference at RMIT
9 Less is More: Rem Koolhaas Manifesto Wins at Downsview /
[ Kapelos, G. ] / Competitions
10 Designing Downsview Park /
[ Brown, B. ] / Van Alen Report
11 Conflicts and Problems of Foreign Models in Designing Youido Park /
[ Zoh. Kyung-Jin.;Jeong-Hann Pae ] / New Directions for the 21C Landscape Architecture : Proceedings of the 9th IFLA Eastern Regional Conference
12 Learning from Downsview /
[ Berger, A. ] / Landscape Architecture
13 조경설계의 새로운 지형 : 다운스뷰파크 국제 설계경기의 몇가지 풍경 /
[ 배정한 ] / 환경과 조경
14 동시대 조경 이론과 설계의 지형(5) : 변신을 꿈꾸는 공원 /
[ 배정한 ] / 환경과 조경
15 /
[ Bava, H. ] / An e-landscape
16 /
[] /
17 /
[] /