Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.6564/JKMRS.2022.26.4.051

Efficient baseline suppression via TIP and modified DEPTH  

Hyun, Namgoong (R&D Division, Kolon Industries)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Magnetic Resonance Society / v.26, no.4, 2022 , pp. 51-58 More about this Journal
Abstract
The baseline flattened NMR spectrum has been achieved by several methodologies including pulse manipulation with a series of phase cycling. The background signal inherent in the probe is also main source of baseline distortion both in solution and solid NMR. The simple direct polarization with 90° pulse flipping the magnetization from the z-axis onto the receiver coil requires the strong rf pulse enough to encompass the wide frequency range to excite the resonance of interest nuclei. Albeit the perfect polarization 90° pulse, the signal from the unwanted magnetic fields such as background signal can not be completely suppressed by suitable phase cycling. Moreover, slowly baseline wiggling signal from the low 𝛾 nuclei is not easy to eliminate with multiple pulse manipulation. So there is still need to contrive the new scheme for that purpose in an adroit manner. In this article new triple pulse excitation schemes for TIP and modified DEPTH pulse sequence are analytically examined in terms of arbitrary phase and flip angle of pulse. The suitable phase cycling for these pulse trains is necessary for the good sensitivity and resolution of the spectrum. It is observed that the 13C sensitivity TIP experiment is almost equal to the CP/MAS with modified DEPTH sequence, both of which are applicable to both solid and solution state NMR.
Keywords
DEPTH; TIP pulse sequence; polarization; baseline suppression; phase cycling;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 D.G. Cory and W. M. Ritchey, J. Magn. Reson. 80, 128 (1988)
2 M.R. Bendall and R. E. Gordon, J. Magn. Reson. 53, 365 (1983)
3 J. F. Feng and J. A. Reimer, J. Magn. Reson. 209, 300 (2011)
4 M. L. Buess and G. L. Petersen, J. Magn. Reson. 49, 1151 (1978)
5 F. Wang, S. K. Ramakrishna, P. Sun, and R. Fu, J. Magn. Reson. 332, 107067, (2021)
6 R. R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen, and A. Wokaun, "Principal of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions"
7 M. H. Levitt, R. Freeman, and T. Frankiel, J. Magn. Reson. 47, 328 (1982)
8 O. W. Sorensen, C. Griesinger, and R. R. Ernst, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 7778 (1985)
9 J. J. Sakurai, " Modern Quantum Mechanics"
10 H. Namgoong, J. Kor. Magn. Reson. Soc. 10, 59 (2006)