1 |
Kim, D-h., & Kim, Y-J., 2015, Analysis of argument structure in science textbooks using Toulmin's argument model: Focused on the photosynthesis unit in middle school science. Educational Research, 63, 37-64.
DOI
|
2 |
Ko, Y., Choi, Y., and Lee, H., 2015, Development of an analytical framework for dialogic argumentation in the context of socioscientific issues: Based on discourse clusters and schemes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 509-521. (in Korean)
DOI
|
3 |
Kuhn, D., 1986, Education for thinking. Teachers College Record, 87(4), 495-511.
|
4 |
Kuhn, D., 1993, Science as argument: Implication for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337.
DOI
|
5 |
Lee, H., Choi, Y., and Ko, Y., 2014, Designing collective intelligence-based instructional models for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 523-534. (in Korean)
DOI
|
6 |
MEST, 2011, 2009-revised science curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, No. 2011-361. (in Korean)
|
7 |
National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
|
8 |
Nussbaum, E.M., and Edwards, O.V., 2011, Critical questions and argument stratagems: A framework for enhancing and analyzing students' reasoning practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(3), 443-488.
DOI
|
9 |
OECD, 2003, Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation (DeSeCo). OECD Press.
|
10 |
Oh, J.Y. and Kim, Y.S., 2009, The avocation and educational Application about Toulmin's argument model. Bumhan philosophical society, 55, 379-425. (in Korean)
|
11 |
Park, Y-S., 2005, Analyzing explicit teaching strategies and student discourse for scientific argumentation. Doctoral dissertation, The Oregon State University. 282 p.
|
12 |
Sadler, T.D. and Zeidler, D.L., 2005, Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
DOI
|
13 |
Wee, S., Yoon, J., and Lim, S., 2014, An Analysis on argumentation structure development of preservice teachers through argumentative writing on earth science related SSI. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 7(1), 11-23. (in Korean)
DOI
|
14 |
Zeidler, D.L., Sadler, T.D., Simmons, M.L., and Howes, E.V., 2005, Beyond STS: A researchbased framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377.
DOI
|
15 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., and Simon, S., 2004, Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
|
16 |
Abell, S.K., Anderson, G., and Chezem, J., 2000, Science as argument and explanation: Exploring concepts of sound in third grade. Inquiry into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science, 100-119.
|
17 |
Albe, V., 2008, When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90.
DOI
|
18 |
Brown, N.J.S., Furtak, E.M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S.O., and Wilson, M., 2010, The evidence-based reasoning framework: Assessing scientific reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 123-141.
DOI
|
19 |
Duschl, R.A, 2003, The assessment of argumentation and explanation: Creating and supporting teachers' feedback strategies. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 139-161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
20 |
Dawson, V.M. and Venville, G., 2010, Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40(2), 133-148.
DOI
|
21 |
Erduran, S., Simon, S., and Osborne, J., 2004, TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
DOI
|
22 |
Fowler, S.R., Zeidler, D.L., and Sadler, T.D., 2009, Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296.
DOI
|
23 |
Furtak, E.M., Hardy, I., Beinbrech, C., Shavelson, R.J., & Shemwell, J.T., 2010, A framework for analyzing evidence-based reasoning in science classroom discourse. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 175-196.
DOI
|
24 |
Hogan, K., 2002, Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341-368.
DOI
|
25 |
Jang, H. and Chung, Y., 2009, Analysis of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision-Making. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(2), 253-266. (in Korean)
|
26 |
Kim, B., Kim, H., Cho, J., and Bae, S., 2015, The effect of the argumentation lessons according to interaction on high school students' academic achievement. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education. 8(3), 309-317. (in Korean)
DOI
|