Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2020.41.1.61

Analyzing Rock Descriptors Used by Elementary School Students in Different Task Contexts  

Oh, Phil Seok (Department of Science Education, Gyeongin National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean earth science society / v.41, no.1, 2020 , pp. 61-74 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare rock descriptors used by students in two different task contexts and to suggest the characteristics of a task suitable for learning of rocks. Twenty-four 3rd grade students were given descriptive and inferential tasks about three types of sedimentary rocks, and the rock descriptors used by the students were analyzed from a resources-based view (RBV) about students' conceptions. The result showed that the number of students using everyday descriptors to describe properties of the rocks and the frequency of using the everyday descriptors decreased in the inferential task. It was also revealed that the students using disciplinarily more appropriate descriptors were more likely to infer the process of rock formation in scientifically valid ways. By contrast, student inferences lacking scientific validity were mostly those that used everyday descriptors to express properties of the rocks. Based on these findings, it was concluded that inferential tasks would be suitable for student learning of rocks which is to be authentic to the essential features of earth science practices.
Keywords
sedimentary rock; rock descriptor; task context; resources-based view; science practice; elementary school students;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ault, C.R. Jr. and Dodick J., 2010, Tracking the footprints puzzle: The problematic persistence of science-asprocess in teaching the nature and culture of science. Science Education, 94, 1092-1122.   DOI
2 Finley, F.N. and Smith, E.L., 1980, Student performance resulting from strategy-based instruction in a sequence of conceptually related tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 17(6), 583-593.   DOI
3 Ford, D.J., 2005, The challenges of observing geologically: Third graders' descriptions of rock and mineral properties. Science Education, 89, 276-295.   DOI
4 Frodeman, R., 1995, Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. GSA Bulletin, 107(8), 960-968.   DOI
5 Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J., and Novak, J.D., 1994, Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gable, D.L. (ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning. Macmillan, New York, 177-210.
6 Happs, J.C., 1985, Cognitive learning theory and classroom complexity. Research in Science & Technological Education, 3(2), 159-174.   DOI
7 Blake, A., 2004, Helping young children to see what is relevant and why: Supporting cognitive change in earth science using analogy. International Journal of Science Education, 26(15), 1855-1873.   DOI
8 Blake, A., 2005, Do young children's ideas about the Earth's structure and processes reveal underlying patterns of descriptive and causal understanding in earth science? Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 59-74.   DOI
9 Caravita, S. and Hallden, O., 1994, Re-framing the problem of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 89-111.   DOI
10 Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R.E., and Redish, E.F., 2005, Resources, framing, and transfer. In Mestre, J. (ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, 89-120.
11 Hawley, D., 2002, Building conceptual understanding in young scientists. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(4), 363-371.   DOI
12 Jeong, J.-W., Lim, C.-H., and Lee, Y.-B., 1994, Elementary school children's conceptions on rock. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 13(1), 1-17.
13 Kim, J.-K. and Kim, H.-G., 1991, A study on the pupil's development about the abilities of the observation (I): On the observation of a porphyritic granite and a conglomerate. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 10(2), 175-182.
14 Kortz, K.M. and Murray, D.P., 2009, Barriers to college students learning how rocks form. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 300-315.   DOI
15 Kwon, Y.-K. and Kim, J.Y., 2012, The problems and improvements of rock specimens used for science education in elementary schools. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 33(1), 83-94.
16 Driver, R. and Oldham, V., 1986, A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122.   DOI
17 Westerback, M.E. and Azer, N., 1991, Realistic expectations for rock identification. Journal of Geoscience Education, 39, 325-330.
18 Dal, B., 2007, How do we help students build beliefs that allow them to avoid critical learning barriers and develop a deep understanding of geology? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 251-269.
19 diSessa, A.A., Gillespie, N.M., and Esterly, J.B., 2004, Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900.   DOI
20 Dove, J.E., 1996, Student teacher identification of rock types. Journal of Geoscience Education, 44, 266-269.   DOI
21 Duit, R., 1991, Students' conceptual frameworks: Consequences for learning science. In Glynn, S.M., Yeany, R.H., and Britton, B.K. (eds.), The psychology of learning science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 65-85.
22 Finley, F.N., 1982, An empirical determination of concepts contributing to successful performance of a science process: A study of mineral classification. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(8), 689-696.   DOI
23 Schoultz, J., Saljo, R., and Wyndhamn, J., 2001, Heavenly talk: Discourse, artifacts, and children's understanding of elementary astronomy. Human Development, 44, 103-118.   DOI
24 Lee, M.J., Kim, C.-J., and Choe, S.-U., 1993, The differences in knowledges activated in laboratory and earth environmental contexts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 13(2), 257-271.
25 Moon, B., 2013 The study of the characteristics and the properties of the granite observing results in the elementary students' scientific inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(2), 101-111.   DOI
26 Oh, P.S., 2015, A theoretical review and trial application of the 'resources-based view' (RBV) as an alternative cognitive theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(6), 971-984.   DOI
27 Palmer, D., 1997, The effect of context on students' reasoning about forces. International Journal of Science Education, 19(6), 681-696.   DOI
28 Reid-Griffin, A., 2016, Learning the language of earth science: Middle school students' explorations of rocks and minerals. European Journal of STEM Education, 1(2), 45-51.   DOI
29 Taber, K.S., 2000, Multiple frameworks?: Evidence of manifold conceptions in individual cognitive structure. International Journal of Science Education, 22(4), 399-417.   DOI
30 Teichert, M.A., Tien, L.T., Anthony, S., and Rickey, D., 2008, Effects of context on students' molecular-level ideas. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1095-1114.   DOI
31 The Ministry of Education, 2015, Science curriculum. The Ministry of Education, Sejong, Korea, 274 p.
32 Tytler, R., 1998, The nature of students' informal science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 901-927.   DOI