1 |
Unsworth, L., 1999, Developing critical understanding of the specialised language of school science and history text: A functional grammatical perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42, 508-521.
|
2 |
Veel, R., 1997, Learning how to mean scientifically speaking: Apprenticeship into scientific discourse in the secondary school. In Christie, F. and Martin, J.R. (eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. Continuum, NY, USA, 161-195.
|
3 |
Vygotsky, L.S., 1981, The instrumental method in psychology. In Wertsch, J.V. (ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology. M.E. Sharpe, NY, USA, 134-143.
|
4 |
Wellington, J. and Ireson, R., 2008, Science learning, science teaching. Routledge, London, UK, 351 p.
|
5 |
Wellington, J. and Osborne, J., 2001, Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, 152 p.
|
6 |
Wells, C.G., 1999, Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA, 392 p.
|
7 |
Westby, C. and Torres-Valasquez, D., 2000, Developing scientific literacy: A sociocultural approach. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 101-110.
DOI
|
8 |
Young, R.F. and Nguyen, H.T., 2002, Modes of meaning in high school science. Applied Linguistics, 23, 348-372.
DOI
|
9 |
Martin, J.R. and Rose, D., 2003, Working with discourse:Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum, London, UK, 293 p.
|
10 |
Moje, E.B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., and Marx, R.W., 2001, “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469-498.
DOI
|
11 |
Newton, P., Driver, R., and Osborne, J., 1999, The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553-576.
DOI
|
12 |
Norris, S.P. and Phillips, L.M., 2003, How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87, 224-240.
DOI
|
13 |
Osborne, J., Erduron, S., and Simon, S., 2004, Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
DOI
|
14 |
Peker, D. and Wallace, C.S., 2011, Characterizing high school students’ written explanations in biology laboratories. Research in Science Education, 41, 169-191.
DOI
|
15 |
Rivard, L.P., 1994, A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 969-983.
DOI
|
16 |
Roth, W.M. and Barton, A.C., 2004, Rethinking scientific literacy. RoutledgeFalmer, NY, USA, 227 p.
|
17 |
Schleppegrell, M.J., 2004, The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA, 190 p.
|
18 |
Shin, H.J., Ham, S.J., Cha, H.J., Maeng, S.H., Shin, M.H., and Kim, C.J., 2009, Genre analysis of texts in science textbooks and science treatises as a starting point of teaching scientific writing. International Conference of East-Asian Science Education, p. 151.
|
19 |
Halliday, M.A.K. and Martin, J.R., 1993, Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, USA, 283 p.
|
20 |
The Ministry of Education, 2007, The New Zealand curriculum: Achievement objectives by learning area. Learning Media Limited, Wellington, New Zealand, 30 p.
|
21 |
Holliday, W.G., Yore, L.D., and Alvermann, D.E., 1994, The reading-science learning-writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promise. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 877-893.
DOI
|
22 |
Kearsey, J. and Turner S., 1999, The value of bilingualism in pupils' understanding of scientific language. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1037-1050.
DOI
|
23 |
Kelly, G.J. and Bazerman, C., 2003, How students argue scientific claims: A rhetorical-semantic analysis. Applied Linguistics, 24, 28-55.
DOI
|
24 |
Kelly, G.J., Chen, C., and Prothero, W., 2000, The epistemological framing of a discipline: Writing science in university oceanography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 691-718.
DOI
|
25 |
Keys, C.W., 1994, The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: An interpretive study of six ninth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1003-1022.
DOI
|
26 |
Keys, C.W., 1999, Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students' written discourse about scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1044-1061.
DOI
|
27 |
Lemke, J.L., 1990, Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation, NJ, USA, 261 p.
|
28 |
Airasian, P.W. and Walsh, M.E., 1997, Constructivist cautious. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 444-449.
|
29 |
Martin, J.R., 1997, Analyzing genre: Functional parameters. In Christie, F. and Martin, J.R. (eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. Continuum, NY, USA, 161-195.
|
30 |
Martin, J.R., 2009, Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10-21.
DOI
|
31 |
Bazerman, C., 1988, Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, USA, 356 p.
|
32 |
Christie, F., 2002, Classroom discourse analysis: A functional perspective. Continuum, NY, USA, 196 p.
|
33 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., and Osborne, J., 2000, Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
DOI
|
34 |
Eggins, S., 2004, An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. Continuum, London, UK, 384 p.
|
35 |
Fang, Z., 2005, Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89, 335-347.
DOI
|
36 |
Fang, Z., 2006, The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491-520.
DOI
|
37 |
Fellows, N.J., 1994, A window into thinking: Using student writing to understand conceptual change in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 985-1001.
DOI
|
38 |
Gallavan, N.P., Bowles, F.A., and Young, C.T., 2007, Learning to write and writing to learn: Insights from teacher candidates. Action in Teacher Education, 29, 61-69.
|
39 |
Glynn, S.M. and Muth, K.D., 1994, Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 1057-1073.
DOI
|
40 |
Gee, J.P., 2005, An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. Routledge, NY, USA, 209 p.
|
41 |
Halliday, M.A.K. and Matthiessen, C.M.I.M., 2004, An introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold, London, UK, 689 p.
|
42 |
김희경, 강태욱, 송진웅, 2003, 7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 과학 교과서 물리단원 실험의 특징. 새물리, 47, 387-394.
과학기술학회마을
|
43 |
남경운, 이봉우, 이성묵, 2004, 과학일기쓰기가 과학영재의 과학에 관련된 정의적 특성에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 24, 1272-1282.
과학기술학회마을
|
44 |
남정희, 곽경화, 장경화, 2008, 논의를 강조한 탐구적 과학 글쓰기의 중학교 과학 수업에의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 28, 922-936.
|
45 |
맹승호, 2008, 수업 담화 장르에 기반한 광물과 암석 단원 과학 수업의 양태 변화: 담화 리지스터와 언어 코드적 접근. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문, 308 p.
|
46 |
맹승호, 신명환, 차현정, 함석진, 신현정, 김찬종, 2010, 지구과학 논문의 언어 특성 이해: 레지스터 분석. 한국지구과학회지, 31, 785-797.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
47 |
박지영, 신영준, 2008, 초등학교 학생들의 과학 글쓰기 선호 유형 조사-생명 영역을 중심으로. 한국생물교육학회지, 36, 600-609.
|
48 |
박희진, 권난주, 2008, 초등학생의 과학일기 유형 분석 및 일기 쓰기의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 28, 519-526.
과학기술학회마을
|
49 |
신미영, 최승언, 2008, 8학년 학생들의 탐구 보고서에 나타난 과학방법의 특징. 한국지구과학회지, 29, 341-351.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
50 |
심재호, 신명경, 이선경, 2010, 2007년 개정 과학과 교육과정의 주요 내용의 실행에 관한 과학 교사의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 30, 140-156.
과학기술학회마을
|
51 |
이미경, 손원숙, 노언경, 2007, PISA 2006 결과 분석 연구 -과학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 수학적 소양 수준 및 배경 변인 분석-. 한국교육과정평가원, 연구보고 RRE 2007-1, 344 p.
|
52 |
이호진, 최경희, 2004, 과학 글쓰기에 나타나는 초등학생들의 선행개념 및 오개념. 교과교육학연구, 8, 421-435.
|
53 |
정혁, 정용재, 송진웅, 2004, 빛을 주제로 한 11학년 학생의 과제 유형에 따른 글쓰기 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24, 1008-1017.
|
54 |
교육인적자원부, 2007, 과학과 교육과정. 교육인적자원부고시 제2007-79호, 89 p.
|
55 |
곽영순, 김주훈, 2003, 좋은 수업에 대한 질적 연구: 중등과학 수업을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 23, 144-154.
|