Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2008.29.7.586

The Development of the Analytic Coding Frames on the Abductive Reasoning in Scientific Inquiry  

Cho, Hyun-Jun (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
Jeong, Sun-Hee (Department of Elementary Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
Yang, Il-Ho (Department of Elementary Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean earth science society / v.29, no.7, 2008 , pp. 586-601 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify the scientists' abductive reasoning in three stages of hypothetical-deductive inquiry process; generating hypothesis, designing, and interpreting data and to suggest new analytic coding frames on abductive reasoning in each of the stages. For this purpose, the interview protocols collected through in-depth interviews with eight scientists were analyzed by the early frame with sub-elements derived from the literature reviews. The need of a new frame of analysis beyond the previously established elements arose from the result of this analysis because the processes of abductive reasoning were found in all three stages. Based on scientists' interview data, this study then designed a new frame of analytic coding frames on the abductive reasoning in each of the stages. The content validity index from four experts was 0.90, and these frames showed a good fit to analyze the scientists' real process of abduction in three stages of hypothetical-deductive inquiry process.
Keywords
abduction; abductive reasoning; scientist; hypothetical-deductive inquiry process;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김재우, 오원근, 박승재, 1999, 중학교 1학년 학생들의 탐 구 문제에 대한 변인 판별 및 통제. 한국과학교육학회지, 19, 674-673
2 박은미, 강순희, 2007, 가설-연역적 수업 프로그램이 창의 적 사고와 비판적 사고 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 27, 225-234
3 양일호, 정진수, 권용주, 정진우, 허명, 오창호, 2006, 과학 자의 과학지식생성과정에 대한 심층면담 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 26, 88-98
4 오필석, 김찬종, 2005, 지구과학의 한 탐구 방법으로서 귀 추법에 대한 이론적 고찰. 한국과학교육학회지, 25, 610-602
5 이윤종, 1997, 현행 중등학교 과학 실험, 실습 교육 실태 조사 및 그 운영 진단(I). 한국과학교육학회지, 17, 435-450
6 DeLoache, J.S., Miller, K.F., and Pierroutsakos, S.L., 1998, Cognitive development beyond childhood. In Damon, W. (series ed.), Kuhn, D., and Siegler, R. (vol. eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology (ed.), vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language. NY, USA, 801-850
7 Horwich, P., 1982, Probability and Evidence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA, 154 p
8 Lawson, A.E., 1995, Science teaching: And the development of thinking. Wadsworth Publishing Company, CA, USA, 624 p
9 Magnani, L., 2008, Creative processes in scientific discovery. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from http://www- 1.unipv.it/webphilos_lab/courses/papers/creat_proces.htm
10 Minnarmeier, G., 2004, Peirce-Suit of truth: Why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought no to be confused. Erkenntnis, 60, 75-105   DOI   ScienceOn
11 권용주, 심해숙, 정진수, 박국태, 2003a, 수증기 응결에 관 한 초등학생들의 가설 생성에서 귀추의 역할과 과정. 한국지구과학회지, 24, 250-257
12 Leake, D.B., 1995, Abduction, experience, and goals: A model of everyday abductive explanation. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 7, 407-428   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Yang, I.-H., Oh, C.-H., and Cho. H., 2007, Development of the scientific inquiry process model based on scientists' practical work. Journal of Korea Association for Research in Science Education, 27, 724-742
14 National Research Council, 2000, Inquiry and the national science education standards. National Academy of Science Press, Washington, DC, USA, 202 p
15 Hanson, N.R., 1958, Patterns of discovery. Cambridge University Press, UK, 252 p
16 조연순, 2001, 창의적.비판적 사고력과 교과 지식의 융합 을 위한 교수-학습 모형으로서의 문제 중심 학습(PBL) 고찰. 초등교육심리, 14, 295-316
17 조연순, 최경희, 2000, 창의적 문제 해결을 위한 중학교 과 학 교육과정 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 20, 329-343
18 김영민, 2006, Kepler의 망막 상 이론 형성 과정에서의 과 학적 문제 발견과 귀추적 사고. 한국과학교육학회지, 26, 835-842
19 오필석, 2006, 지구환경적 문제 해결 과정에서 귀추적 추론 을 위한 규칙 추리 전략들. 한국과학교육학회지, 26, 546-558
20 McCormack, A.J. and Yager, R.E., 1989, A new taxonomy of science education. Science Teacher, 56, 47-48
21 Josephson, J.R. and Josephson, S.G., 1994, Abductive inference: Computation, philosophy, technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA, 316 p
22 권용주, 정진수, 강민정, 김영신, 2003b, 과학적 가설 지식의 생성 과정에 대한 바탕이론. 한국과학교육학회지, 23, 458-469
23 정진수, 원희정, 권용주, 2005, 과학적 가설의 생성력 향성 을 위한 삼원귀추모형의 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 25, 595-602
24 Hempel, C.G., 1966, Philosophy of natural science. Prentice- Hall, NJ, USA, 116 p
25 김정섭, 박수홍, 2002, 지식 창출을 위한 논리로서 가추법 과 교수설계 적용을 위한 탐색. 교육공학연구, 18, 139- 165
26 Shank, G. and Cunningham, D.J., 1996, Modeling the six modes of Peircean abduction for educational purposes. Proceedings of Midwest Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference in Bloomington, Indiana, April 26. Retrieved March 15, 2008, from http://www. cs.indiana.edu/event/maics96/Proceedings/shank.html
27 Clancey, W.J., 1985, Heuristic classification. Artificial Intelligence, 27, 289-350   DOI   ScienceOn
28 윤은호, 2006, 경험 귀추적 탐구 수업 전략이 과학2 혼합 물의 분리 단원에 미치는 효과. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문, 118 p
29 Chinn, C.A. and Brewers, W.F., 1993, The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Ressearch, 63, 1-51
30 Magnani. L., 2001, Abduction, Reason, and Science. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, NY, USA, 224 p
31 황성원, 김희경, 유준희, 박승재, 2001, 중학교 3학년 학생 들의 개방적 탐구에서 과학적 탐구 기능에 대한 자기 평가 수행 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 21, 506-515
32 Eco, U, 1983, Horns, hooves, insteps: Some hypotheses on three types of abduction. In Eco, U. and Sebeok, T.A. (eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA, 198-220
33 Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., and O'Loughlin, M., 1988, The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press, NY, USA, 249 p
34 Peirce, C.S., 1958, Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 1-2. In Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (eds.), Harvard University Press, MA, USA, 558 p
35 조희형, 박승재, 1995, 과학 학습지도. 과학교육사, 서울, 324-344
36 권용주, 양일호, 정원우, 2000, 예비과학교사들의 가설 창안 과정에 대한 탐색적 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 20, 29- 42
37 Hanson, N.R., 1961, Is there a logic of scientific discovery. In Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Current issues in the philosophy of science. Rinehart and Winston, NY, USA, 20-35
38 Harman, G., 1965, The Inference to the Best Explanation. Philosophical Review, 64, 88-95
39 Kim, C.-J. and Cunningham, D.J., 2003, A syllogism for formulating hypotheses. Semiotica, 144, 303-317
40 Kruijff, G.-J. M., 2005, Peirces' late theory of abduction: A comprehensive account. Semiotica, 153, 431-454