Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2007.28.1.001

Reflective Inquiry Disposition: Students' Responses to Different Class Types of Inquiry-based High School Earth Science  

Jeong, Jin-Woo (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
Park, Mi-Ra (Department of Earth Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
Cheong, Cheol (Department of Environmental Education, College of Education, Daegu University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean earth science society / v.28, no.1, 2007 , pp. 1-13 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to understand characteristics of students' reflective inquiry disposition in the contexts of classroom and to find educational implications for the promotion of the reflective inquiry activity in the inquiry-based class. In this study, we determined a characteristic of the reflection inquiry by examining students' responses showed in response to the different class types in high school earth science inquiry class. The result of the study indicated that the difference between the newly developed class type to promote the reflective inquiry and the existing inquiry class type was found significant. The newly developed reflective inquiry class had a multitude of reflective inquiry statements related to various elements of data context in terms of the quantity and diversity of the reflective inquiry. In conclusion, we found that the newly developed class type had a positive impact on the students' reflective inquiry activity. We believe that the development of the inquiry activity to promote students' reflective inquiry is critical.
Keywords
reflective inquiry; context of classroom; reflective inquiry scale;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 이상로, 변창진, 진위교, 1987, 표준화 성격진단검사. 중앙적성연구소, 서울, 13 p
2 Herrenkohl, L.R. and Guerra, M.R., 1998, Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16 (4), 431-473   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R.T., 1975, Learning together and alone: Cooperation, competition, and individualization. Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA, 214 p
4 NRC (National Research Council), 1996, National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 262 p
5 Radinsky, J., 2000, Making sense of complex data: A framework for studying students' development of reflective inquiry dispositions. Doctoral Dissertation, Northwestern University, IL, USA, 349 p
6 Burns, J., Okey, J., and Wise, K., 1985, Development of an integrated process skills test: TIPSII. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22 (2), 169-177   DOI
7 Lonning, R. A., 1993, Effect of cooperative learning strategies on student verbal interactions and achievement during conceptual change instruction in 10th grade general science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1087-1101   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Radinsky, J., Leimberer, J.M., and Gomez, L.M., 2000, Reflective inquiry with complex data: A case study of dispositional learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1-84
9 Radinsky, J., Loh, B., Mundt, J., Marshall, S., Gomez, L. M., Reiser, B.J., and Edelson, D.C., 1999, Problematizing complex datasets for students: Design principles forinquiry curriculum. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Researchers Association, 1-21
10 임희준, 1998, 과학수업에서의 협동학습: 교수효과와 소집단의 언어적 상호작용. 서울대학교 박사학위논문, 246 p
11 강석진, 한수진, 노태희, 2002, 과학개념 학습에서 협동적 소집단 토론의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(1), 93-101
12 이현영, 장상실, 성숙경, 이상권, 강성주, 최병순, 2002, 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 660-670
13 Ngeow, Karen and Kong, Yoon-San, 2003, Learning through Discussion: designing tasks for critical inquiry and reflective learning, ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading, English and Communication, 1-6
14 Loh, B., Reiser, B.J., Radinsky, J., Edelson, D.C., Gomez, L.M., and Marshal, S., 2001, Developing reflective inquiry practices: A case study of software, the teacher, and students. In Crowley, S.K., Schunn, C, and Okada, T. (eds.), Designing for science: implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, 279-323
15 Loh, B., 2003, Using articulation and inscription as catalysts for reflection: Design principles for reflective inquiry. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, IL, USA, 344 p
16 강석진, 2000, 토론과정에서의 사회적 합의 형성을 강조한 개념학습전략: 교수효과 및 소집단 토론에서의 언어적 상호작용. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문, 194 p
17 성숙경, 2005, 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학탐구실험에서 언어적 상호작용의 변화와 특성. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문, 263 p
18 Mundt, J., Bramlette, J., Finn, L.E., Olson, J., Flores, S., North-Tomcyzk, K., Lachance-Whitcomb, J., Loh, B., and Radinsky, J., 2000, Earth structures and processes: Exploring earth's crust with models and data. A middle school thematic science curriculum from the Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools. 164 p
19 노진호, 1996, 존 듀이의 교육이론: 반성적 사고와 교육. 문음사, 서울, 178 p
20 이현영, 2002, 사회적 상호작용을 강조한 과학 탐구실험 과정에서 학생-학생 상호작용 양상 분석. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문, 77 p