Browse > Article

Teachers' Research Experiences in Labs and Fields  

Shin, Myeong-Kyeong (Department of Science Education, Gyeongin National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean earth science society / v.27, no.7, 2006 , pp. 715-722 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study intended to find evidence of changes in teacher beliefs of teaching and learning and a case of infusing research experiences in teaching modules since their research participation. As part of this study, twenty three science and math teachers in Korea were provided with science research labs and field experiences in the University of Iowa for three weeks. The research units that teachers participated in for three weeks covered seven fields of subjects such as: geology, astronomy, chemistry, physics, mathematics, computer science, and environmental engineering. In the course of this study, the effectiveness of science research participation program was explored in terms of changing teacher beliefs and their production of teaching modules based on their research. This study especially focused on identifying changes of beliefs on science teaching and learning after participating in the research. A case study of a participant teacher was also conducted by comparing descriptively teaching modules before and after experiencing the program. It was found that the program affected the new modules and the research experiences affected participants' beliefs toward student centeredness.
Keywords
teacher research experiences; teacher beliefs; professional development;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Fischer-Mueller, J. and Zeidler, D. L., 2002, A case study of teacher belief in contemporary science education goals and classroom practices. Science Educator, 11 (1), 46-57
2 Kowalski, T. J., 1984, Research and assumptions in adult education: implications for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 35 (3), 8-10   DOI
3 Gallagher, J. and Parker, J., 1995, Secondary Teaching Analysis Matrix-Science Version. Michigan State University
4 Yager, R.E., 1991, The constructivist learning model; Towards real reform in science education. The Science Teacher, 59 (9), 53-57
5 Green, S.B., Salkind, J.J., and Akey, T.M., 1997, Using SPSS for windows; analyzing and understanding data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
6 Waggett, D.L., 1999, A study of patterns in pedagogical beliefs of pre-service science teachers over three semesters of instruction and associated practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
7 Aguirre, J. and Speer, N. M., 2000, Examining the relationship between belief and goals in teacher practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 1 (3), 327-356
8 Little, J.W., 1993, Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation an Policy Analysis, 15 (2), 129-151
9 Richardson, L. and Simmons, P., 1994, Self-O research method and analysis, teacher pedagogical philosophy Interview, theoretical background, samples of data (Research technical report). Athens: the University of Georgia
10 Craven, J. A., 1997, Relationships between new science teachers beliefs and student perceptions of the learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 160 p
11 Posner, G.J., 1992, Field experiences: A guide to reflective teaching, 3rd ed. New York: Longmans Publishing Group