Browse > Article

Growth Evaluation of 10 Cultivars of Creeping Bentgrass in Salt Affected Environment  

Kim, Jun-Beom (Department of Environmental Landscape Architecture Science, Sangmyung Univ.)
Yang, Geun-Mo (Department of Green Landscape Architecture Science, Dankook Univ.)
Choi, Joon-Soo (Department of Green Landscape Architecture Science, Dankook Univ.)
Publication Information
Asian Journal of Turfgrass Science / v.22, no.2, 2008 , pp. 149-160 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was carried out to examine the growth performance of 10 cultivars of creeping bentgrass under salt injury in Seo-san reclaimed area. Turfgrass performance studies included 10 creeping bentgrass cultivars (T-1, L-93, Penn A1, Pennlinks II, Seaside II, Declaration, Penn A4, Crenshaw, Dominant, and Penncross). Ten creeping bentgrass cultivars were grown on a USGA recommended research green. Plots were seeded on May 31, 2006 at the rate of $7\;g{\cdot}m^{-1}$. Electric conductivities of irrigation water (ECw) and soil (ECe) were ranged from 0.28 to $3.3\;d\;S{\cdot}m^{-1}$ and from 0.25 to $3.5\;d\;S{\cdot}m^{-1}$ respectively. Leaf color, turf quality, coverage rate, and growth rate were checked under the salty condition in reclaimed land for 2 year. Creeping bentgrass cultivars of T-1, Penn links, and Crenshaw presented dark green color and Penn A1, Declaration showed lighter green color. Penn A1, Penn A4 and L-93 exhibited the highest overall turfgrass quality. Average visual coverage was 75.3% after eleven weeks after seeding. Dominant, L-93, and Penn A1 resulted in higher visual coverage compared to the other cultivars. There was no difference in density among cultivars at 1 year after establishment. However, Declaration, Penn A1, T-1, and L-93 showed higher density compared to the other cultivars at 2 years after seeding. Creeping bentgrass showed different quality, density and color in salty soil (ECe: $0.25-3.5\;d\;S{\cdot}m^{-1}$) and from application of salty irrigation water (ECw: $0.28-3.3\;d\;S{\cdot}m^{-1}$) conditions. These results will be useful where selecting green cultivars for the golf courses in reclaimed land area.
Keywords
conductivity; creeping bentgrass; cultivars; ecology; reclaimed area; salt; visual quality; Penn A1;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김현인. 2006. 크리핑 벤트그래스 7품종의 생육특성. 단국대학교 대학원. 석사학 위논문
2 Carrow, R.N. and R.R. Duncan. 1998. Salt-affected turfgrass sites. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 96
3 Engelke, M.C., V.G. Lehman, W.R. Kneebone, P.F. Colbaugh, J.A. Reinert, and W.E. Knoop . 1995. Registration of 'Crenshaw' creeping bentgrass. Crop Sci. 35(2): 590
4 USGA Green Section Stuff. 1993. USGA recommendation for a method of putting green construction. USGA Green Section Record March/April:1-3
5 Turgeon, A.J. 1991. Turfgrass management. 3rd ed. Prentic-Hall, Inc
6 Waddington, D.V., R.N. Carrow, and R.C. Shearman. 1992. Turfgrass. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., p. 209
7 이형성, 홍범석, 김경덕, 태현숙. 2007. 봄철 크리핑 벤트그래스 품종별 특성비교. 한국잔디학회지 21(2):155-162   과학기술학회마을
8 이상재. 2000. 한국의 골프장 그린의 특성 및 그린 스피드에 관한 연구. 성균관대학교 대학원. 박사학위논문
9 한국잔디연구소. 2008. 회원사별 잔디종류. www.ktri.co.kr
10 이상재, 허근영. 1999. 한국의 골프 코스 그린의 설계 및 시공 특성에 관한 연구. 한국잔디학회지. 13(4):181-190
11 Dernoeden, P.H. 2002. Creeping bentgrass management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. p. 8
12 Beard, J.B. 1973. Turfgrass: science and culture. Prentice-Hall, Inc
13 Turfgrass Producers International Turf News(Jul/Aug 1998) pp. 31-32
14 NTEP. 2008. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program. www.ntep.org