Browse > Article

Growth Characteristics of Creeping bentgrass Cultivars  

이혜원 (클럽폴라리스(주))
정대영 (청주대학교 산업과학 연구소)
심상렬 (청주대학교 환경조경학과)
Publication Information
Asian Journal of Turfgrass Science / v.17, no.2_3, 2003 , pp. 87-97 More about this Journal
Abstract
The growth characteristics of creeping bentgrass seeded in the seaside landfill golf course are as follows. 1. As a result of analysis on the chemical characteristics of soil mixture used for turfgrass ground in this experiment, soil pH was 7.9, which is somewhat higher than the creeping bentgrass reference value of pH 5.5∼6.5; T-N(%) was 0.02, which is proper for the reference value, and trace element too lacked. 2. The cultivar with the fastest water infiltration was Seaside II recorded as 226.2cm/sec, while that with the slowest water infiltration was Pennlinks recorded as 141.1 cm/hr which was too faster than the USGA water infiltration reference value of 15∼30cm/hr. For the surface hardness of turfgrass ground with different cultivars, no statistically significant variation was found between the Penncross grass and the Pennlinks recorded as 18.6mm and 19.1 mm, respectively. The soil penetration was the highest in Pennlinks recorded as 7.6kg/$\textrm{cm}^2$ and lowest in Penn A-1 as 6.1kg/$\textrm{cm}^2$. 3. As a result of evaluation on visual quality at the early stage of growth, Penncross showed the most excellent visual quality compared to the others. However, Penn A-1 showed the most excellent visual quality at a late stage of growth around Sep. 17, 2003, and it was also excellent in the evaluation of visual color. Seaside II showed higher density around the root and the longest root length and was highly resistant to salt compared to others, but the initial sprouting rate was not satisfied, and the visual quality in the summer season was inferior to others. 4. As a result of measurement of the traffic injury, Penncross showed the most tolerant to the traffic stress and Pennlinks showed the most susceptible.
Keywords
creeping bentgrass; cultivars; seaside landfill golf course;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 심상렬, 정대영, 김경남. 2000. 스포츠 그라운드에 적합한 식재지반과 잔디 초종에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 28(2): 61-70
2 안용태 외. 1992. 골프장 관리기본과 실제. 한국잔디연구소. pp.83-85, 90-91, 102, 150-151, 608
3 Beard, J. B. 2002. Turf Management for Golf Course
4 이상재. 2000. 한국의 골프장 그린의 특성 및 그린 스피드에 관한 연구. 성균관대학교대학원 박사학위논문. pp.46-47
5 Turgeon, A. J. 1985. Turfgrass Management. Prentice-Hall, INC
6 Norman, W. Hummel, Jr. 1993 Rationale for the Revisions of the USGA Green Construction Specifications
7 Daniel, W. H. and R. P. Freeborg. 1979. Turf managers' handbook. Harvest Book Publishing Co.
8 한국체육과학연구원. 1998. 잔디구장의 조성과 관리
9 Beard, J. B. 1973. Turfgrass: science and culture. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
10 심상렬 $\cdot$ 정대영. 2002. 축구경기장의 잔디 초종 선정에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 30(2): 88-94
11 Huang, B., X. Liu and J. D. Fry. 1998. Effects of high temperature and poor soil aeration on root growth and viability of creeping bentgrass. crop science 38 : 1618 - 1622   DOI   ScienceOn
12 http:// www. ntep.org/
13 USGA Green Section Staff. 1993. USGA Recommendations for a Method of Putting Green Construction. USGA Green Section Record March/April: 1-3