1 |
Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631.
DOI
|
2 |
Pfeffer, J. (1985). Organizational demography: Implications for management. California Management Review, 28(1), 67-81.
DOI
|
3 |
Pfeffer, J. (1991). Organization theory and structural perspectives on management. Journal of Management, 17(4), 789-803.
DOI
|
4 |
Pierce, J. L. (1996). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley; LA; London: University of California Press.
|
5 |
Price de Solla, D. J. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
|
6 |
Rosenbaum, M. E. (1986). The repulsion hypothesis: On the nondevelopment of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1156.
DOI
|
7 |
Sarsons H. (2015). Gender differences in recognition for group work. Harvard University Working Paper. Also Available at https://scholar.harvard.edu/sarsons/publications/note-gender-differences-recognition-group-work
|
8 |
South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 47(5), 587-599.
DOI
|
9 |
South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1983). Female labor force participation and the organizational experiences of male workers. The Sociological Quarterly, 24(3), 367-380.
DOI
|
10 |
Spangler, E., Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84(1), 160-170.
DOI
|
11 |
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius, (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings, key readings in social psychology (pp. 276-293). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
|
12 |
Tolbert, P. S., Simons, T., Andrews, A., & Rhee, J. (1995). The effects of gender composition in academic departments on faculty turnover. ILR Review, 48(3), 562-579.
DOI
|
13 |
Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 549-579.
DOI
|
14 |
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and Research (pp. 77-122). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.
|
15 |
Wharton, A., & Bird, S. (1996). Stand by your man: Homosociality, work groups, and men's perceptions of difference. Research on Men and Masculinities Series, 9, 97-114.
|
16 |
Williams, C. L. (1992). The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female" professions. Social problems, 39(3), 253-267.
DOI
|
17 |
Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. Res Organ Behav, 20, 77-140.
|
18 |
Winquist, J. R., & Larson Jr, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 371.
DOI
|
19 |
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 847-870.
DOI
|
20 |
Zhu, Y. & Ma, Y. (2015). Gender, Time Allocation and Scholarly Productivity among Chinese University Faculty. Collection of Women's Studies, 4, 24-49.
|
21 |
Allison, P. D., & Long, J. S. (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 469-478.
DOI
|
22 |
Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321-341.
DOI
|
23 |
Alexander, V. D., & Thoits, P. A. (1985). Token achievement: An examination of proportional representation and performance outcomes. Soc. F., 64(2), 332-340.
DOI
|
24 |
Allmendinger, J., & Hackman, J. R. (1995). The more, the better? A four-nation study of the inclusin of women in symphony orchestras. Social Forces, 74(2), 423-460.
DOI
|
25 |
Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
DOI
|
26 |
Blalock, H. M. (1957). Percent non-white and discrimination in the South. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 677-682.
DOI
|
27 |
Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). New York: Free Press.
|
28 |
Budig, M. J. (2002). Male advantage and the gender composition of jobs: Who rides the glass escalator? Social Problems, 49(2), 258-277.
DOI
|
29 |
Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 11). Academic Press.
|
30 |
Cox, Jr., T. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. Jossey-Bass.
|
31 |
Diaz-Garcia, C., Gonzalez-Moreno, A., & Jose Saez-Martinez, F. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation, 15(2), 149-160.
DOI
|
32 |
Fields, D. L., & Blum, T. C. (1997). Employee satisfaction in work groups with different gender composition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2), 181-196.
DOI
|
33 |
Fisher, B. S., Cobane, C. T., Vander Ven, T. M., & Cullen, F. T. (1998). How many authors does it take to publish an article? Trends and patterns in political science. PS: Political Science & Politics, 31(4), 847-856.
DOI
|
34 |
Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In H. Zuckeman, J. R. Cole, & J. T. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp.188-204). N.Y.: W. W. Norton
|
35 |
Fox, M. F., & Mohapatra, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542-571.
DOI
|
36 |
Garcia Martinez, M., Zouaghi, F., & Garcia Marco, T. (2016). Diversity is strategy: The effect of R&D team diversity on innovative performance. R&D Management, 47(2), 311-329.
|
37 |
Henderson, L., & Herring, C. (2013). Does critical diversity pay in higher education? Race, gender, and departmental rankings in research universities. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(3), 299-310.
DOI
|
38 |
Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208-224.
DOI
|
39 |
Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.
|
40 |
Hinnant, C. C., Stvilia, B., Wu, S., Worrall, A., Burnett, G., Burnett, K. Kazmer, M. M., & Marty, P. F. (2012). Author-team diversity and the impact of scientific publications: Evidence from physics research at a national science lab. Library & Information Science Research, 34(4), 249-257.
DOI
|
41 |
Hollis, A. (2001). Co-authorship and the output of academic economists. Labour Economics, 8(4), 503-530.
DOI
|
42 |
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 741-763.
DOI
|
43 |
Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 599-627.
DOI
|
44 |
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York City: Basic books Inc.
|
45 |
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social studies of science, 35(5), 673-702.
DOI
|
46 |
Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21(1), 45-71.
DOI
|
47 |
Ma, Ying. (2017). Policies and measures towards promoting women's development in S&T fields-International experiences and China's status. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 3,180-184.
|
48 |
Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31-55.
DOI
|
49 |
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
|
50 |
Martin, P. Y., & Harkreader, S. (1993). Multiple gender contexts and employee rewards. Work and Occupations, 20(3), 296-336.
DOI
|
51 |
Nakhaie, M. R. (2002). Gender differences in publication among university professors in Canada. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 39(2), 151-179.
DOI
|
52 |
Newcomb, T. (1961). The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. doi:10.1037/13156-000.
DOI
|