Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.22675/STIPR.2017.8.1.023

Entrepreneurial Universities - Towards a Revised Paradigm  

Meissner, Dirk (Higher School of Economics, National Research University / Research laboratory for Science and Technology Studies)
Publication Information
STI Policy Review / v.8, no.1, 2017 , pp. 23-40 More about this Journal
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive review of the entrepreneurial university concept and its place and role in the triple helix of university, industry, and government. This is increasingly important because stake-holders' expectations towards universities are growing; this growth in turn leads to increased pressure on universities to move beyond their traditional roles and models towards taking responsibility for economic development, large scale basic education and targeted further education and the development of value from research. These expectations provide opportunities for universities, but impose threats on the existing models and practices. It further elaborates on implications for university management, departments, faculty members and supporting organizations. Moreover it reflects on the meaning of the entrepreneurial university for stakeholders, i.e., university boards, regional and national policy and administrative bodies, funding agencies, the business community, university ranking institutions and the global university community overall. Recent literature on entrepreneurial universities is incomplete and mostly focused on the commercialization of research, technology transfer and the third mission of universities. The article expands the predominant thinking about entrepreneurial universities and gives a broader structured definition. Eventually the article shows the need for STI policy to intervene and measures for developing entrepreneurial universities further.
Keywords
triple helix; knowledge triangle; entrepreneurial university; university-industry linkages; open innovation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal Of Industrial Economics, 54(4),637-676
2 Bell, E. (2010). International capacity building for sustainable growth: What role for the world's learned societies? Foresight-Russia, 4(1), 60-63. (in Russian)
3 Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(2008), 1175-1187.   DOI
4 Baskaran, A., & Muchie, M. (2008). Foreign direct investment and internationalization of R&D: The case of BRICS economies (DIIPER Research Series Working Paper No. 7). Retrieved from https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/4200/1/Baskaran_-_Mammo_DIIPER_Working_paper_2008-7.pdf
5 Cervantes, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). Commercialising public research under the open innovation model: New trends. Foresight-Russia, 8(3), 70-81.   DOI
6 Demirbag, M., & Glaister, K. W. (2010). Factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: A comparative study of developed and emerging regions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1534-1560. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00948.x   DOI
7 Dooley L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332.   DOI
8 Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123.   DOI
9 Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M., Benner, M., Guaranys, L., Maculan, A. M., & Kneller, R. (2008). Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence. Science and Public Policy, 35(9), 681-695.   DOI
10 Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research policy, 29(2), 313-330.   DOI
11 Gokhberg, L., & Meissner, D. (2013). Innovation: Superpowered invention. Nature 501, 313-314. doi:10.1038/501313a   DOI
12 Guinet J., & Meissner, D. (2012). Open innovation: Implications for corporate strategies, government policy and international R&D spillovers. Foresight-Russia, 6(1), 26-36. (in Russian)   DOI
13 Hemphil, T., & Vonortas, N. S. (2003). Strategic research partnerships: A managerial perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(2), 255-271.   DOI
14 Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825-838.   DOI
15 Lawrence, D., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332.   DOI
16 Luger, M., & Goldstein, H. (1997). The role of public universities. In R. Bingham, & R. Mier, (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development (pp. 104-134). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
17 O'Shea R. P., Allen T. J., Morse, K. P., Colm O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1-16.
18 Martinell A., Meyer M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 259-283.   DOI
19 Meissner, D. (2013). Instruments to measure Foresight. In D. Meissern, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future (pp. 43-62). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
20 Meissner, D. (2014). Approaches for developing national STI strategies. STI Policy Review, 5(1), 34-56.   DOI
21 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Commercialising public research: New trends and strategies. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264193321-en, accessed 17.06.2014.
22 Schibany, A., & Reiner, C. (2014). Can basic research provide a way out of economic stagnation? Foresight-Russia, 8(4), 54-63.
23 Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142.   DOI
24 Sivak, Y., & Yudkevich, M. (2008). Closed academic environment and local academic conventions. Foresight-Russia, 2(4), 32-41. (in Russian)   DOI
25 Mrinalini, N., & Wakdikar, S. (2008). Foreign R&D centers in India: Is there a positive impact? Current Science, 94(5), 452-458.
26 Tether, B., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37, 1079-1095   DOI
27 Williams, T. & Vonortas, N. S. (2015). Strategic alliances/knowledge-intensive partnerships. In N. S. Vonortas, P. C. Rouge, & A. Aridi (2015) (Eds.), Innovation policy: A practical introduction - Series of springerbriefs in entrepreneurship and innovation (pp 47- 64). New York; Heidelberg; Dordrecht; London: Springer.
28 Wong P. K., Ho Y. O., & Singh A. (2007). Towards an ''entrepreneurial university'' model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958.   DOI
29 Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8),1188-1204.   DOI