Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2022.66.5.405

High School Students' Perception of Performance Assessment: Focusing on the Performance Assessment of Chemistry Teacher  

Kim, Hyunjung (Department of Chemistry Education, Kongju National University)
Kim, Sungki (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Publication Information
Abstract
This study investigated the perceptions of high school students for 8 performance assessment methods in a chemistry teacher's class by using an explanatory sequential design. To this end, a survey was conducted with 439 students from 10 high schools, and after that, 28 students from 5 schools were interviewed to interpret the survey results. The findings were as follows: First, students were experiencing a biased assessment method rather than various performance methods. Second, intuitive confirmation, relevance to a career path, and internal growth were mentioned in the performance assessment method that felt fun, and readiness and unclear evaluation criteria were mentioned in the performance assessment method that felt difficult. Third, the students recognized that it was not an appropriate performance method if the assessment result was affected by individual abilities less relevant to the chemistry subject or the assessment criteria were unclear.
Keywords
Performance assessment; Perception; Chemistry teacher; High school student;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lee, J. W.; Noh, J. East Asian Mathematical Journal 2020, 36, 515.
2 Shin, H.; Ahn, S. -Y.; Kim, Y. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation 2017, 20, 135.   DOI
3 Jeon, Y.; Lee, Y.-H. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics 2019, 22, 199.   DOI
4 Lim, Y.; Kim, S. A.; Kim, S.-H. The Korean Journal of Technology Education 2022, 22, 54.
5 Ministry of Education. Full-fledged Discussion of the Future Curriculum with the Public: Announcement of "2022 Revised National Curriculum Plan"; 2021.
6 Gyeonggido Office of Education. 2022 Common Subject 'Integrated Science' to Ensure the Minimum Academic Achievement Level; 2022.
7 Oh, S.; Kwon, N. Y.; Kim, S. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics 2019, 29, 507.   DOI
8 Lee, K. Y. Social Studies Education 2007, 46, 95.
9 Ko, K. S.; Kim, Y.-J. Korean Journal of Contemporary Education 2020, 32, 87.
10 Kim, S. Korean Journal of Teacher Education 2019, 35, 1.
11 Ivankova, N. V.; Creswell, J. W.; Stick, S. L. Field Methods 2006, 18, 3.
12 Kim, H. K.; Ko, K. C.; Kim, D. J. Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea 1999, 3, 61.
13 Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. "Student Assessment Support Portal"; https://stas.moe.go.kr/cmn/main (accesed 2022-06-29)
14 Kim, S.; Kim, H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2022, 66, 107.   DOI
15 Kim, K.; Paik, S. Journal of Chemical Education 2021, 98, 2381.   DOI
16 Kim, J. H. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation 2017, 20, 271.   DOI
17 Kim, J. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2018, 18, 839.
18 Cho, S. Y. Secondary Education Research 2017, 65, 255.
19 Ministry of Education. 2015 Revised National Curriculum; 2015.
20 Lane, S.; Stone, C. A. Performance Assessment. In Educational Measurement; Brennan, R. L. Ed.; Praeger Publishers: CT, 2006; pp 387-431.
21 Lee, J.; Nam, J.; Moon, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2003, 23, 66.
22 Uhm, H. J.; Yang, J. H. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education 2008, 21, 255.
23 Park, T. Secondary English Education 2016, 9, 77.
24 Lee, H.; Beak, J.; Kwak, Y. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2020, 44, 133.
25 Kim, J.; Kim S. Journal of Educational Research 2008, 18, 1.
26 Lim, E.-H.; Ahn, K. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2015, 15, 107.
27 Shadish, W. R.; Cook, T. D.; Campbell, D. T. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference; Mifflin Company: Houghton, 2002.
28 Creswell, J. W.; Clark, V. L.; Gutmann, M. L.; Hanson, W. E. Advanced Mixed Methods Research Designs. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research; Tashakkori, A.; Teddlie. C. Eds.; Sage: CA, 2003; pp 209-240.
29 Kim, S.-W. Journal of Educational Evaluation 2007, 20, 53.
30 Lee, K. Y.; An, H. S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2005, 25, 173.
31 Hwang, S. W.; Kim H. K.; Yoo, H. J.; Park, S. J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2001, 21, 506.
32 Kim, H.-J. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology 2019, 9, 131.
33 Seong, T. J. Easy-to-understand Statistical Analysis Using SPSS/AMOS; Hakjisa: Seoul, 2012.
34 Yu, I.; Lim, H.-W. Foreign Languages Education 2021, 28, 85.
35 Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Paik, S. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2020, 64, 111.   DOI
36 Choi, O.; Yeau, S. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 2004, 8, 437.
37 Kim, S.; Min, H.; Ha, M. S.; Paik, S. H. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation 2021, 24, 231.   DOI
38 Kim, S.; Min, H.; Paik, S. H. Korean Journal of Teacher Education 2020, 36, 1.