Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2022.66.4.305

The Effect and Disturbance Factors of Practical-Based Teacher Education Program for the Development of TPACK in Pre-service Chemistry Teachers  

Jung, Mi Sun (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Paik, Seoung-Hey (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Abstract
In this study, a practice-based teacher education program was developed and applied to improve the TPACK of pre-service chemistry teachers. Also the program effect and obstacles were confirmed by measuring the development of TPACK. The participants of this study were 20 pre-service chemistry teachers of 3rd grade and 2 pre-service chemistry teachers of 4th grade who took chemistry education courses at K University located in Chungcheongbuk Province. The developed teacher education program consisted of four stages: preparation, rehearsal, practice, and reflection. The feedbacks from researchers and colleagues pre-service teachers were provided in preparation, rehearsal, and reflection stages. As a result of the study, the program of this study did not show an educational effect in the "constructive learning activities" of preservice teachers, but it was found to have an educational effect in "problem solving". In other words, in "constructive learning activity", most pre-service teachers were at 0 level before and after the program. The pre-service teachers designed the class to unilaterally provide technology to simply use it as a tool to explain subject content or revise misconceptions, and learners can passively acquire knowledge. However, in the case of "problem solving", the pre-service teachers who were at level 0 before the educational program changed to level 1. Before the program, the pre-service teachers designed classes to solve problems by memory without using technology, but after the program they planned classes that provides opportunities to approach and solve various problems through the technology presented by the teacher. However, there were not many pre-service teachers corresponding to level 2, which constitutes voluntary learning in which learners use technology to solve various problems while selecting and variously manipulating technology. In addition, as obstacles to the TPACK development of pre-service chemistry teachers, there were external factors such as lack of classroom support environment for TPACK implementation, lack of time for education planning, and inadequate technology competency. And there were internal factors such as perspectives of traditional education and negative attitude toward technology. In particular, the proportion of pre-service teachers who preceived inappropriate technical competency as an external obstacles of TPACK development was high. Therefore, it was necessary to develop an education program corresponding to type 2 or type 3 that enables TPACK development through TK for pre-service teachers.
Keywords
Pre-service chemistry teacher; Practice-based teacher education program; TPACK; Obstacles of TPACK development;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Linn, M. C.; Davis, E. A.; Bell, P. E. Internet Environments for Science Education; Routledge: USA, 2004.
2 Lee, H.; Linn, M. C.; Varma, K.; Liu, O. L. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2010, 47, 71.
3 Edelson, D. C.; Gordin, D. N.; Pea, R. D. Journal of the learning Sciences 1999, 8, 391.
4 Bell, R. L.; Trundle, K. C. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2008, 45, 346.
5 Anderson, R. M.; Heesterbeek, H.; Klinkenberg, D.; Holling-sworth, T. D. The lancet 2020, 395, 931.
6 So, H.-J.; Kim, B. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2009, 25, 101.
7 Koehler, M. J.; Mishra, P.; Kereluik, K.; Shin, T. S.; Graham, C. R. The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Framework; In Spector, J. M. Merrill, M. D. Elen, J. Bishop M. J., Eds.; Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology; Springer: New York, 2014.
8 Mishra, P.; Koehler, M. J. Teachers College Record 2006, 108, 1017.
9 Graham, C. R. Computers & Education 2011, 57, 1953.
10 Niess, M. L. AMTE Connections 2008, 17, 9.
11 Baran, E.; Chuang, H. H.; Thompson, A. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET 2011, 10, 370.
12 Bruce, B. C. Journal of Literacy Research 1997, 29, 289.
13 Koehler, M. J.; Mishra, P.; Hershey, K.; Peruski, L. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 2004, 12, 25.
14 Hofer, M.; Grandgenett, N. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2012, 45, 83.
15 Hofer, M.; Grandegenett, N.; Harris, J. B.; Swan, K. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2011, 4352.
16 Chai, C. S.; Koh, J. H. L.; Tsai, C. C. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 2010, 13, 63.
17 Choi, K. S.; Paik, S. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2021, 41, 325.
18 Mouza, C.; Karchmer-Klein, R. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2013, 48, 127.
19 Chai, C. S.; Koh, J. H. L.; Tsai, C. C. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 2013, 16, 31.
20 Osborne, J.; Hennessy, S. Literature Review in Science Education and the Role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions (Vol. 6); Futurelab: London United Kingdom, 2003.
21 Higgins, T. E.; Spitulnik, M. W. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2008, 17, 511.
22 Kim, M. C.; Hannafin, M. J.; Bryan, L. A. Science Education 2007, 91, 1010.
23 Mistler-Jackson, M.; Songer, N. B. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2000, 37, 459.
24 Varma, K.; Husic, F.; Linn, M. C. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2008, 17, 341.
25 Pedersen, J. E.; Yerrick, R. K. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2000, 11, 131.
26 Songer, N. B.; Lee, H.; Kam, R. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2002, 39, 128.
27 Kim, M. C.; Hannafin, M. J.; Bryan, Science Education 2007, 91, 1010.
28 Schnittka, C.; Bell, R. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2009, 9, 131.
29 Raza, S. A.; Qazi, W.; Khan, K. A.; Salam, J. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2020, 59, 1. DOI: 10.1177/0735633120960421   DOI
30 Lee, Y.; Ryu, J.; Han, K. S. Creativity Education Research 2020, 20, 65.
31 Willermark, S. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2018, 56, 315.
32 Koehler, M. J.; Mishra, P. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2005, 32, 131.
33 Carr, A. A.; Jonassen, D. H.; Litzinger, M. E.; Marra, R. M. Educational Technology 1998, 38, 5.
34 Koehler, M. J.; Shin, T. S.; Mishra, P. How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. In Ronau, R. N. Rakes, C. R. Niess, M. L., Eds.; Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches; IGI Global: USA, 2012.
35 Harris, J. B.; Mishra, P.; Koehler, M. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2009, 41, 393.
36 Brush, T.; Saye, J. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2009, 9, 46.
37 Stoilescu, D. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2015, 52, 514.
38 Schmidt, D. A.; Baran, E.; Thompson, A. D.; Mishra, P.; Koehler, M. J.; Shin, T. S. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2009, 42, 123.
39 Koh, K. Developing Preservice Teachers' Assessment Literacy: A Problem-Based Learning Approach. In Preciado Babb, P., Ed.; Proceedings of the IDEAS: Rising to Challenge Conference; Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary: Calgary, Canada, 2014.
40 Lin, T. C.; Tsai, C. C.; Chai, C. S.; Lee, M. H. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2013, 22, 325.
41 Voogt, J.; Fisser, P.; Pareja Roblin, N.; Tondeur, J.; van Braak, J. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2013, 29, 109.
42 Niess M.; Gillow Wiles, H. Proceedings of SITE 2010-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, 3911.
43 Forzani, F. M. Journal of Teacher Education 2014, 65, 357.
44 Roblyer, M.; Knezek, G. A. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 2003, 36, 60.
45 Koh, J. H. L. Australasian Journal of Education Technology 2013, 29, 887.
46 Strauss A.; Corbin J. Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In Denzin, N. K.; Lincoln, Y. S., Eds.; Handbook of Qualitative Research; Sage Publications: London, 1994.
47 Lampert, M.; Franke, M. L.; Kazemi, E.; Ghousseini, H.; Turrou, A. C.; Beasley, H.; Cunard, A.; Crowe, K. Journal of Teacher Education 2013, 64, 226.
48 Graham, C. R.; Burgoyne, N.; Borup, J. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, 3826.
49 Hechter, R.; Phyfe, L. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, 3841.
50 Darling-Hammond, L. Journal of Teacher Education 2006, 57, 300.
51 Grossman, P.; Hammerness, K.; McDonald, M. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 2009, 15, 273.
52 Ball, D. L.; Cohen, D. K. Handbook of Policy and Practice 1999, 1, 3.
53 Aydin-Gunbatar, S.; Demirdogen, G.; Tarkin, C. A.; Kutucu, E.; Ekiz, K. B.; Akin, F.; Tuysuz, M.; Uzuntiryaki, K. E. Science Teacher Education 2013, 97, 903.
54 Howland, J. L.; Jonassen, D. H.; Narra, R. M. Meaningful learnong with Technology; Pearson Higher Ed.; USA, 2012.
55 Kim, Y.; Silver, R. E. Journal of Teacher Education 2016, 67, 203.
56 Ertmer, P. A.; Conklin, D.; Lewandowski, J.; Osika, E.; Selo, M.; Wignall, E. Teacher Education Quarterly 2003, 30, 95.
57 Strauss, A.; Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques; Citeseer: USA, 1998.
58 Schon, D. The reflective Practitioner; Basic Books: New York, 1983.
59 National Reserch Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education; The National Academies Press: Washington, D.C. 2012.
60 Niess, M. L.; Ronau, R. N.; Shafer, K. G.; Driskell, S. O.; Harper, S. R.; Johnston, C.; Browning, C.; Ozgun-Koca, S. A.; Kersaint, G. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2009, 9, 4.
61 LoTi. Digital-Age Framework. Retrieved from http://ts.prn.bc.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/39/2012/01/LoTi_Frame-work_Sniff_Test.pdf, 2011.
62 Allsopp, M.; Hohlfeld, T.; Kemker, K. Proceeding of Florida Educational Research Association 2007 Conference; Tampa: FL, 2007.
63 Artigue, M. Digital technologies: A window on theoretical issues in mathematics education. In Strasser, R., Eds.; Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 5); Larnaca: Cyprus University, 2007.
64 Kaput, J.; Noss, R.; Hoyles, C. Developing new notations for a learnable mathematics in the computational era. In English, L., Ed.; Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education; Lawrence Erlbaum: NJ, 2008.
65 Niess, M. L.; van Zee, E. H.; Gillow-Wiles, H. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 2010, 27, 42.
66 Choi, K.; Paik, S. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2020, 40, 437.
67 Mouza, C. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Educators, 2nd ed.; Routledge: UK, 2016.
68 Ozden, S. Y.; Mouza, C.; Shinas, V. H. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 2016, 24, 471.