Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2021.65.2.151

A Comparative Analysis of the Method of Evaluation of Character Competence in High School Chemistry Classes Based on Collaborative Problem-Solving for Competency(CoProC) Instruction Model  

Kim, Minjung (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Park, Jihun (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Park, Jongseok (Department of Chemistry Education, Kyungpook National University)
Son, Jeongwoo (Department of Physics Education, Gyeongsang National University)
Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.65, no.2, 2021 , pp. 151-165 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study applied chemistry classes based on Collaborative Problem-Solving for Competency(CoProC) Instruction Model to 86 high school seniors and recognized the resulting changes in Character Competence through character competence test, analysis of argumentation, and analysis of reflective writing. In addition, the analysis of the correlation between the assessment results showed what each evaluation method meant to assess Character Competence. The study found that the average score of Character Competence rose in all three assessments, but differences were found in the detailed factors. Character competency test is meaningful in helping students participate with a sense of mastery of learning as a self-evaluation, and the analysis of the argumentation process seems to be an appropriate evaluation method to evaluate the Character Competence shown by students' words and actions through course evaluations. An analysis of reflective writing showed the advantage of being able to analyze Character competencies that are difficult to show in action by looking back on the entire course of learning. In addition, given that the correlation between the three assessment results is very low, it is expected that the three Character competency assessment methods will be conducted together to obtain detailed and comprehensive information on students' character competencies.
Keywords
Collaborative Problem-Solving for Competency (CoProC) instruction model; Character competence test; Argumentation; Reflective writing; Evaluation of character competence;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Im, S. H. Korean Educational Development Institute: Seoul, Korea 2017; RR 2017-23 p 107.
2 Do, S. L. Korean Journal of Thinking Development 2013, 9, 143.
3 Lee, J. A Study for Improvement of Character Education for Korean Young People. M.A. Pusan National University, Busan, Korea, 2009.
4 Ministry of Education. Five Year Comprehensive Plan of Character Education (2016-2020), 2016.
5 Kwon, J. I.; Nam, J. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2017, 37, 847.   DOI
6 Character Education Partnership 2002. http://www.character.org/(accessed 11/6/20).
7 Center for Curriculum Redisign (CCR) 2015. http://www. curriculumredesign.org (accessed 11/6/20).
8 Moon, Y. L.; Choi, I. S.; Kwak, Y. J.; Lee, H. J. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity, Ministry of Education and Science Technology: Seoul, Korea, 2010; 2009-019.
9 Cooley, A. Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association 2008, 43, 188.   DOI
10 David, C. Parker.; Jennifer S. Nelson.; Matthew K. Burns. Psychology in the Schools 2010, 47, 817.   DOI
11 Agboola, A.; Tasai, K. C. European Journal of Educational Research 2012, 1, 163.   DOI
12 Lee, Y. The Journal of Elementary Education 2012, 25, 125.
13 Yang, J. S.; Cho, N. S.; Park, S. Y.; Jang, G. J.; Eun, J. Y. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation 2013; RRC, 6.
14 OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development. The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies, 2003.
15 Stiff-Williams, H. R. The Clearing House 2010, 83, 115.   DOI
16 Park, J. D. Journal of Moral Education 2014, 26, 177.   DOI
17 Yoo, J. B. The Korean Journal of Philosophy of Education 2016, 38, 99.   DOI
18 Jang, K. S.; Lee, D. Y.; Song, S. M.; Woo, Y. K.; Jeong, C. W. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation 2015; RRI 2015-3.
19 Kim, K. E.; Lee, N. R. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 2012, 16, 231.   DOI
20 Lee, M. H. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2019, 19, 311.
21 Jo, I. J. The Blue Concerning the Improvement of Evaluation Method for Highschool Law Education. M.E. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea, 2010.
22 Kwak, Y. S. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society 2013, 34, 378.
23 Kang, Y. J.; Jeon, R. Y.; Kim, J. N.; Kim, H. H.; Park, J. S.; Son, J. W.; Jo, H. S.; Nam, J. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2018, 38, 555.   DOI
24 Park, S.; Huh, S. The Journal of Child Education, 2012, 21, 35.
25 Ryu, C.; Jin, H. The Journal of Education, 2006, 26, 139.
26 Yang, J.; Kim, H.; Gao, L.; Kim, E.; Kim, S.; Lee, H. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 2012, 32, 113.   DOI
27 Kwon, D. W. Effects of Science Teaching Applying the Collaborative Problem Solving for Competency (CoProC) Instruction Model on the Practical Character Competence and Social Competence of Middle School Students. M.E. Pusan National University, Busan, Korea, 2019.
28 Park, J. Joernal of Education Evaluation 2019, 32, 421.
29 Hong, S. H.; Noh, U. K.; Jeong, S. Journal of Educational Evaluation 2011, 24, 713.
30 Jeon, R. Y; Kim, H. H; Nam, J. H; Kang, E. G; Son, J. W; Park, J. S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2018, 38, 419.   DOI
31 Moon. S. W. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy 2002, 14, 655.
32 Sadler, D. R. Instructional Science 1989, 18, 119.   DOI
33 Lee, Y. S. Korea Journal of Counseling 2009, 10, 2479.   DOI
34 JoongAng Ilbo; Kyung Hee University. Lack of honesty, consideration, self-regulation - Middle school students 'crisis of human nature'. http;//news.joins.com/article/12654736?ctg= (accessed 10/6/20).
35 Lee, H. J. A Investigation of Method Effects Associated With Negatively Worded Items and Positively Worded Items on Self-Report Surveys. Ph.D. Korea University, Seoul, Korea, 2012.
36 Black, P; Wiliam, D. Evaluation and Accountability 2009, 21, 5.   DOI
37 Kim, S. W.; Choi, T. J. Educational Research Methodology; Hakjisa: Seoul, 2015; pp 148-149.
38 Jeong, J. H. The Korean Association of Practical Arts Education 2010, 23, 206.
39 Kim, H. K.; Park, J. I.; Park, E. A.; Seo, M. H.; Han, K. T. Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation 2013; pp 1-169.
40 Kang, H. S.; Joo, D. B. Modern Curriculum and Evaluation; Hakjisa: Seoul, 2012; p 371.
41 Kwon, M. J.; Lee, Y. S. Journal of Ethics Education Studies 2017, 44, 157.   DOI
42 Leahy, S.; Lyon, C.; Thompson, M.; Wiliam, D. Educational Leadership 2005, 63, 18.
43 Griffiths, M.; Davies, C. British Educational Research Journal 1993, 19, 43.   DOI
44 Jo, H. K. Exploration of Supporting Teaching and Learning of Mathematics Assessment Through Observation and Interview. Ph.D. Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea, 2014.