Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.6.401

Exploration Factors Affecting Maintenance of the Effect of Mentoring for Beginning Science Teachers  

Park, Jihun (Pusan National University)
Nam, Jeonghee (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that affect the maintenance of the effect of mentoring for beginning science teachers. Mentee teachers for this study were ten mentee teachers who took part in the collaborative mentoring from 2014 to 2018. For this study, the videos of the first and fifth classes submitted during the mentoring program, mentors and mentees' journals, the videos of the classes recorded in 2019, questionnaires about reflection on the mentoring program, and interview materials were collected and analyzed. The result of this study is as follows. First, the reflective thinking was sustained after the mentoring program, and this played a crucial role in maintaining the effects of the mentoring. The group that showed the improvement of RTOP score had reflective thinking and made reflective practice on their teaching. Most participants in the group created the classes of constructivism based on self-reflection on their classes. However, no positive changes in the classes occurred to mentee teachers who couldn't have reflective thinking. Second, reflective practices during the mentoring program exerted a strong influence on the teaching method of mentee teachers. The group of the improvement in RTOP score strived to apply student-centered model of instruction to their classes. It was showed that most mentee teachers in the group kept applying the student-centered model to their classes after the mentoring was completed. These results indicate reflective thinking and reflective practice are crucial factors to the effect of the mentoring and its maintenance.
Keywords
Mentoring; Mentee; Mentor; Reflective thinking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 KEDI POLL 2019; Korean Educational Development Institute: Seoul, Korea 2000; pp 79-80.
2 Go, M.; Lee, S.; Choi, J.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2009, 29, 564.
3 Wenglinsky, H. How Teaching Matters: Bringing the Classroom Back Into Discussions of Teacher Quality; Milken Family Foundation and Educational Testing Service: Princeton, NY, 2000; p 31.
4 Nam, J.; Kim, H.; Go, M.; Ko, M. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2010, 30, 544.
5 Dewey. How we Think: A re-statement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process; Heath, & Co: Boston, 1933; p 78.
6 Schon, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: Howprofessionals Think in Action; Basic books: NY, 1983.
7 Schon, D. A. Educating the Reflective Practitioner; Jossey-Bass; San Francisco, 1987.
8 Van Manen, J. Curriculum Inquiry 1997, 6, 205.   DOI
9 Bradbury, L. U. Science Education 2010, 94, 1049.   DOI
10 Feiman-Nemser, S.; Parker, M. B. International Journal of Educational Research 1993, 19, 699.   DOI
11 Ganser, T. Getting Off to a Good Start: A Collaborative Mentoring Programme for Beginning Teachers. Paper presented at the annual Diversity in Mentoring Conference, Chicago, USA, April 3, 1992.
12 Lim, J.; Ryu, K.; Kim, B. The Journal of Korean Education 2017, 44, 5-32.
13 Huffman, G.; Leak, S. Journal of Teacher Education 1986, 37, 22.   DOI
14 Huling-Austin, L. Teacher Induction Programs and Internships; Handbook of Research on Teacher Education; Macmillan: New York, 1990; pp 535-548.
15 Martin, A.; Trueax, J. Transformative Dimensions of Mentoring: Implications for Practice in the Training of Early Childhood Teachers. Paper presented at the China-U.S. Conference on Education, Beijing, China, July 9-13, 1997.
16 Odell, S. J.; Ferraw, D. P. Journal of Teacher Eduction 1992, 43, 200.   DOI
17 Guskey, T. R. Journal of Staff Development 1994, 15, 42.
18 O'Connor, D.; Ertmer. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 2006, 10, 97.
19 Lord, P.; Atkinson, M.; Mitchell, H. Mentoring and Coaching for Professionals: A Study of the Research Evidence; National Foundation for Educational Research: USA, 2008; p 105.
20 U.S. Department of Education. Schools and school districts recognized for outstanding professional development; http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/09-2000/0918.html (accessed May 19, 2020).
21 Lee, S.; Go, M.; Nam J.; Lee, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2016, 36, 877.   DOI
22 Leslie, K.; Lingard, L.; Whyte, S. Medical Teacher 2005, 27, 693.   DOI
23 Go, M.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2013, 33, 94.   DOI
24 Jung, M.; Lee, S.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2013, 57, 778.   DOI
25 Nam, J.; Lee, S.; Lim, J.; Moon, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2010, 30, 953.   DOI
26 Nam, J.; Go, M.; Seong, H.; Ko, M.; Lee, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2012, 30, 544.   DOI
27 Ogawa, M. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2002, 22, 1082.
28 Park, J.; Son, E.; Lee, S.; Nam, J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2017, 61, 251.   DOI
29 Keys, C. W.; Hand, B.; Prian, V.; Collins, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065.   DOI
30 Nam, J.; Kwak, K.; Jang, K.; Hand, B. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2008, 28, 922.
31 Cho, H. Development and effect of argument-based modeling strategy as teaching method in middle school students. Ph.D. Thesis, Pusan National University, Busan, February 2014.
32 Sawada, D.; Piburn, M. D.; Judson, E.; Turley, J.; Falconer, K.; Benford, R.; Bloom, I. School Science and Mathematics 2002, 102, 245.   DOI