Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.6.360

An Exploration of Learning Environment for Promoting Conceptual Understanding, Immersion and Situational Interest in Small Group Learning Using Augmented Reality  

Shin, Seokjin (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jaewon (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.64, no.6, 2020 , pp. 360-370 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study explored the learning environment for promoting conceptual understanding, immersion, and situational interest in small group learning using augmented reality, according to the level of students' self-regulation. 95 ninth-grade students from a coed high school in Seoul participated in this study. Students were divided into a group of four and each group was randomly assigned to three learning environments that provide one marker and one smart device(1-1), two markers and two smart devices(2-2), and four markers and four smart devices(4-4) for a group. Small group learning using augmented reality was conducted for two class periods about the chemical bonding concept from the Integrated Science subject. Two-way ANOVA results revealed that students in the 4-4 learning environment scored significantly higher than those in the 1-1 or 2-2 learning environment in a conception test. Changes in the learning environment have affected students with a low level of self-regulation. In an immersion test, students in the 4-4 learning environment scored significantly higher than those in the 1-1 learning environment, and changes in the learning environment have affected students with a high level of self-regulation. As a result of situational interest test, students in the 4-4 and 2-2 learning environments scored significantly higher than those in the 1-1 learning environment, and changes in the learning environment have affected students with a low and a high level of self-regulation. Based on the results, the educational implications of the learning environment for promoting conceptual understanding, immersion, and situational interest in small group learning using augmented reality are discussed.
Keywords
Augmented reality; Small group learning; Chemical bonding;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Azuma, R. T. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1997, 6, 355.   DOI
2 Lukosch, S.; Billinghurst, M.; Alem, L.; Kiyokawa, K. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2015, 24, 515.   DOI
3 Chen, Y. C. A Study of Comparing the Use of Augmented Reality and Physical Models in Chemistry Education; Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications, New York, USA, 369-372, 2006.
4 Science Level Up 2015; Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity; Seoul. [Online] https://sciencelevelup.kofac.re.kr/
5 Jung, Y.; Sung, Y.; Lim, S.; Ryu, J.; Seo, H.; Ahn, H. A Study on the Implementation of Future Digital Textbooks. Korea Education & Research Information Service; Daegu, 2017, pp 25-44.
6 Akcayir, M.; Akcayir, G. Educational Research Review 2017, 20, 1.   DOI
7 Phon, D. N. E.; Ali, M. B.; Halim, N. D. A. Collaborative Augmented Reality in Education: A Review; In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, Kuching, Malaysia, 78-83, 2014.
8 Yoo, M.; Kim, J.; Koo, H.; Song, J. The Journal of Educational Information and Media 2018, 24, 459.
9 Diegmann, P.; Schmidt-Kraepelin, M.; Eynden, S.; Basten, D. Benefits 2015, 3, 1542.
10 Ibanez, M. B.; Di Serio, A.; Villaran, D.; Kloos, C. D. Computers & Education 2014, 71, 1.   DOI
11 Ko, Y.; Kim, C. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 2012, 16, 373.
12 Kye, B.; Kim, Y. Journal of Educational Technology 2008, 24, 193.   DOI
13 Novak, T. P.; Hoffman, D. L. Interval Research Corporation 1997, 31, 1.
14 Salmi, H.; Thuneberg, H.; Vainikainen, M. P. International Journal of Science Education 2017, 7, 253.   DOI
15 Nachairit, A.; Srisawasdi, N. Using Mobile Augmented Reality for Chemistry Learning of Acid-base Titration: Correlation Between Motivation and Perception; In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education, Hangzhou, China, 519-528, 2015.
16 Nunez, M.; Quiros, R.; Nunez, I.; Carda, J. B.; Camahort, E.; Mauri, J. L. Collaborative Augmented Reality for Inorganic Chemistry Education; In WSEAS International Conference. Heraklion, Greece, 271-277, 2008.
17 Li, N.; Gu, Y. X.; Chang, L.; Duh, H. B.-L. Influences of AR-supported Simulation on Learning Effectiveness in Face-to-face Collaborative Learning for Physics; In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, GA, USA, 320-322, 2011.
18 Baran, B.; Yecan, E.; Kaptan, B.; Pasayigit, O. Education and Information Technologies 2019, 25, 1371.   DOI
19 Dalim, C. S. C.; Kolivand, H.; Kadhim, H.; Sunar, M. S.; Billinghurst, M. Journal of Computer Science 2017, 13, 581.   DOI
20 Gweon, G.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.; Lee, K. J.; Rhim, J.; Choi, J. MABLE: Mediating Young Children's Smart Media Usage with Augmented Reality; In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, USA, 1-9, 2018.
21 Loyens, S. M.; Magda, J.; Rikers, R. M. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 20, 411.   DOI
22 Lee, J.; Sim, H.; Kim, K.; Lee, K. Theory and Practice of Education 2010, 15, 99.
23 Panadero, E.; Kirschner, P. A.; Jarvela, S.; Malmberg, J.; Jarvenoja, H. Small Group Research 2015, 46, 431.   DOI
24 Han, J.; Noh, T.; Lee, J.; Lee., H. The Journal of Yeolin Education 2006, 14, 103.
25 Panitz, T. Ted's Cooperative Learning e-book. Abruf am, 2001. [Online] https://tpanitz.jimdofree.com/ted-s-coop-learning-ebook/
26 Chiang, T. H. C.; Yang, S. J. H.; Hwang, G.-J. Computers & Education 2014, 78, 97.   DOI
27 Dunleavy, M. TechTrends 2014, 58, 28.   DOI
28 Pintrich, P. R.; Smith, D. A.; Garcia, T.; McKeachie, W. J. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1993, 53, 801.   DOI
29 Tan, D. K. C.; Treagust, D. F. School Science Review 1999, 81, 75.
30 Coll, R. K.; Treagust, D. F; Research in Science Education 2001, 31, 357.   DOI
31 Seo, H. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media 2008, 14, 137.
32 Unal, S.; Calik, M.; Ayas, A.; Coll, R. K. Research in Science & Technological Education 2006, 24, 141.   DOI
33 White, R. T.; Gunstone, R. F. Probing Understanding. Falmer Press: London, UK, 1992.
34 Jackson, S. A.; Marsh, H. Wearning. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 1996, 18, 17.   DOI
35 Chen, A.; Darst, P. W.; Pangrazi, R. P. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 71, 383.   DOI
36 Kim, M. J. Automation in Construction 2013, 33, 79.   DOI
37 Kang, H.; Kim, M.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2007, 27, 18.
38 Seong, T. Modern Basic Statistics: Understanding and Application. Hakjisa: Seoul, 2013.
39 Saks, K.; Leijen, A. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014, 112, 190.   DOI
40 Georgiou, Y.; Kyza, E. A. In Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning 2017, 1.
41 Reilly, M.; Shen, H. Shared Note-taking: a Smartphonebased Approach to Increased Student Engagement in Lectures; In The 11th International Workshop on Collaborative Editing Systems in Conjunction with ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China, 1-9, 2011.
42 Zimmerman, H. T.; Land, S. M.; Jung, Y. J. Using Augmented Reality to Support Children's Situational Interest and Science Learning During Context-Sensitive Informal Mobile Learning. In: Pena-Ayala A., Eds.; Mobile, Ubiquitous, and Pervasive Learning, Springer, Cham, 2016; p 101.