1 |
Stevens, S. Y.; Shin, N.; Peek-Brown, D. Journal of Education Quimica. 2013, 24, 381.
|
2 |
Pierson, J. L. The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning 2008, The University of Texas at Austin.
|
3 |
Robertson, A. D.; Atkins, L. J.; Levin, D. M.; Richards, J. What is responsive teaching? 2016 New York, NY, Routledge. 1-35.
|
4 |
Ball, D. L. Elem. School J. 1993, 93, 373.
DOI
|
5 |
Maskiewicz, A.C.; Winters, V. Paper Presented at the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2010, Chicago.
|
6 |
Maskiewicz, A. C.; Winters, V. A. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2012, 49, 429.
DOI
|
7 |
Kavanagh, S.S.; Metz, M.; Hauser, M.; Fogo, B.; Taylor, M.; Carlson, J. Practicing responsiveness: Using approximations of teaching to develop teachers' responsiveness to students' ideas. Journal of Teacher Education 2019 Advance online publication.
|
8 |
Bain, R. B. Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom 2006 Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080-2114.
DOI
|
9 |
Niaz, M. Sci. Ed. 1995, 79, 19.
DOI
|
10 |
Moje, E. B. Doing and teaching disciplinary literacy with adolescent learners: A social and cultural enterprise 2015 Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 254-278.
DOI
|
11 |
Levin, D. M.; Grant, T.; Hammer, D. Attending and responding to student thinking in science 2012 The american biology Teacher, 74(3), 158-162.
DOI
|
12 |
Empson, S.B.; Jacobs, V.R. Learning to listen to children's mathematics 2008, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense. pp. 257-281.
|
13 |
Shin, N.; Koh, E. J.; Choi, C. I.; Jeong, D. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2014, 34, 437.
DOI
|
14 |
Sangmyeon, A. 청람과학교육연구논총 1993, 3, 368.
|
15 |
Hammer, D. M. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1996, 5, 97.
DOI
|
16 |
Radoff, J.; Hammer, D. Attention to Student Framing in Responsive Teaching Routledge: New York, 2016; pp 189-202.
|
17 |
Hogan, K. International Journal of Science Education 1999, 21, 855.
DOI
|
18 |
Hammer, D.; Sikorski, T. R. Implications of complexity for research on learning progressions. Science Education 2015, 99, 424.
DOI
|
19 |
Nayeon, J.; Kim, E.; Paik, S.-H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2019, 63, 123.
DOI
|
20 |
Lee, J.; Lee, B.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2018, 62, 243.
DOI
|
21 |
Watkins, J.; McCormick, M.; BethkeWendell, K.; Spencer K.; Milto, E.; Portsmore, M.; Hammer, D. Sci. Ed. 2018, 102, 548.
DOI
|
22 |
Colestck, A. A.; Sherin, M. G. What Teachers Notice When They Notice Student Thinking: Teacher-Identified Purposes for Attending to Students' Mathematical Thinking. In Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics, Robertson, A. D., Scherr, R. E., Hammer, D. Eds.; Routledge: New York, 2016; pp. 126-144.
|
23 |
Harrer, B. W.; Flood, V. J.; Wittmann, M. C. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 2013, 9, 023101.
DOI
|
24 |
Hammer, D.; van Zee, E. Seeing the Science in Children's Thinking: Case Studies of Student Inquiry in Physical Science; Heinemann: Portsmouth, NH, 2012.
|
25 |
diSessa, A. A. Cognition and Instruction 1993, 10, 105.
DOI
|
26 |
Colley, C.; Windschitl, M. Rigor in elementary science students' discourse: The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk. Science Education 2016, 100, 1009.
DOI
|
27 |
Portides, D. P. Science & Education 2007, 16, 699.
DOI
|
28 |
Brodie, K. Working with learners' mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for changing pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education 2011, 27, 174.
DOI
|