Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.3.159

The Effects of Design Thinking in High School Chemistry Classes  

Yang, Heesun (Department of Elementary Science Education, Korea National University of Education)
Kim, Mi-Yong (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Kang, Seong-Joo (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.64, no.3, 2020 , pp. 159-174 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine 'Design Thinking' based Chemistry Class program as an education strategy for core competence of creative convergence talent. The program stages were modified and supplemented into eight stages, including 'Knowledge Understand', 'Empathy', 'Sharing perspective', 'Ideate', '1st Prototype', '1st Test', '2nd Prototype', and '2nd Test', so that the 'Design Thinking Process in Science Education' can be applied to the chemistry class. Considering the linkage between the 2015 and 2009 revised national curriculum, the achievement criteria were selected, and the lesson plans and student activity sheet were developed according to the themes to be met. Four thematic educational programs were developed and applied to Chemistry I for the second grade of high school students from March to August. The results were verified through qualitative data analysis of the class scene and pre- and post-test based on inventories of 'Empathy' 'STEAM educational competence', 'Problem solving process'. As a result of applying the developed program, 'empathy' showed a significant improvement in empathy with others and empathy with the problem situation. In 'STEAM educational competence', there was a significant enhancement in science and design competence. In the 'problem finding process', the problem definition, problem solution design, and problem-solving review were significantly improved in the 'problem-solving process'. The results of this study provided implications for the applicability of design thinking - based chemistry classes and its educational effect.
Keywords
Design thinking; High school chemistry classes; Empathy; Problem-solving process; STEAM educational competence;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rauth, I.; Koppen, E.; Jobst, B.; Meinel, C. In Design thinking: an educational model towards creative confidence; DS 66-2: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity (ICDC 2010); 2010.
2 Kwon, Y.; Lim, S. Journal of Communication Design 2017, 60, 8.
3 Jeon, S. Journal of Art Education 2005, 19, 355.
4 Retna, K. S. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 2016, 36, 5.   DOI
5 Lee, J. Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture 2015, 21, 455.
6 Zong, E. Journal of Korean Society of Communication Design 2015, 25, 247.
7 Lee, E; Tae, J. Journal of Curriculum Integration 2017, 11, 143.
8 Kim, H.; Shim, H.; Cho, S. Korean Academy of Commodity Science & Technology 2016, 34, 43.
9 Lee, H.; Park, Y. Journal of Art Education 2016, 30, 145.
10 Suh, E. Korean Association for Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction 2017, 17, 173.   DOI
11 Lee, D.; Yoon, J.; Kang, S. School Science Journal 2016, 10, 151.   DOI
12 Lim, J.; Ahn, M. Analysis of Learning Experience for Collaborative Communication in Design Thinking Activities with Engineering Students. Journal of the Korea Computer Education Association's Academic Presentation Conference 2018, 23, 27.
13 Lim, J. The effects of Design Thinking on College students' Empathy Ability, Master dissertation, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea, 2017.
14 Goldman, S.; Carroll, M. P.; Kabayadondo, Z.; Cavagnaro, L. B.; Royalty, A. W.; Roth, B.; Kwek, S. H.; Kim, J. In Assessing d. Learning: Capturing the Journey of Becoming a Design Thinker; Design thinking research; Springer: 2012; pp 13-33.
15 Razzouk, R.; Shute, V. Review of Educational Research 2012, 82, 330.   DOI
16 Young, G. Zumio Meaningful Innovation 2010, 61, 1.
17 Melles, G.; Howard, Z.; Thompson-Whiteside, S. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2012, 31, 162.   DOI
18 Kim, S.; Kim, J.; Kang, S.; Kim, T.; Yoon, J. The Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Education 2019, 44, 162.   DOI
19 Liedtka, J. J. Prod. Innovation Manage. 2015, 32, 925.   DOI
20 Kurtmollaiev, S.; Pedersen, P. E.; Fjuk, A.; Kvale, K. Academy of Management Learning & Education 2018, 17, 184.   DOI
21 Chun, O.; Yang, H.; Kang, S. Cogent Education 2018, 5, 1499477.   DOI
22 Yang, H.; Kang, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education 2019, 39, 249.
23 Park, J.; Woo, O. Journal of Educational Technology 1999, 15, 55.   DOI
24 Kim, Y.; Lee, D. The Korean Association of Yeolin Education 2011, 1.
25 Kincheloe, J. L. Autobiography and Critical Ontology: Being a Teacher, Developing a Reflective Persona. In Auto/biography and Auto/ethnography: Praxis of Research Method; Wolff-Michael Roth, Ed.; Sense Publishers: Rotterdam, 2005.
26 Corbin, J.; Strauss, A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 2014.
27 Buxton, B. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design; Morgan kaufmann: San Francisco, 2010.
28 Arnheim, R. Visual Thinking (35th anniversary printing); University of California Press: Berkeley, 2004.
29 Kim, H.; Cho, S.; Shim, H. Korean Academy of Commodity Science & Technology 2015, 33, 91.
30 Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development 2015 Revised National Curriculum 2015; Ministry of Education, Science and Technology Notice No. 2015-74.
31 Martin, R. Strategy & Leadership 2010, 38, 37.   DOI
32 Lee, S.; Kim, T.; Kim, J.; Kang, S.; Yoon, J. Journal of Korean Information Education 2019, 23, 73.   DOI
33 Brown, T. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation; Harper Business: New York, 2009.
34 Carroll, M.; Goldman, S.; Britos, L.; Koh, J.; Royalty, A.; Hornstein, M. International Journal of Art & Design Education 2010, 29, 37.   DOI
35 Mootee, I. Design Thinking for Strategic Innovation: What They Can't Teach you at Business or Design School; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, N.J., 2013.
36 Liedtka, J. Strategy & Leadership 2011, 39, 13.   DOI
37 Lawson, B. How Designers Think; Routledge: London, 2006.
38 Dolak, F.; Uebernickel, F.; Brenner, W. Design Thinking and Design Science Research. Positioning Paper DESRIST. Institute of Information Management. New York: University of St. Gallen, 2013, HSG/IWI-1-11.
39 Dorst, K. Des Stud. 2011, 32, 521.   DOI