Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.2.67

Comparison of In Vitro Lipid Deposition and Change of Optical Characteristics on Daily Disposable Lenses (1-day) and 3-days Lenses Over 3 days  

Song, Sun Jung (Department of Optometry & Vision Science, Daegu Catholic University)
Lee, Su Yeon (Optical Convergence Technology Center, Daegu Catholic University)
Kim, Ki Hong (Department of Optometry & Vision Science, Daegu Catholic University)
Chu, Byoung Sun (Department of Optometry & Vision Science, Daegu Catholic University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The study aimed to investigate in vitro lipid deposition of oleic acid, oleic acid methyl ester and cholesterol on a daily disposable (1-day lenses) and 3-days lenses over 3 days and changes of optical characteristics is also investigated. Artificial tear solutions were prepared to simulate actual tear compositions. Two types of contact lenses (1-day lenses (Senofilcon A) and 3-days lenses (silicone tripolymer)) were soaked in the artificial tear solutions within an incubator at 37 ℃ with 150 rpm for 8, 16, 24 hours. Lipid deposition (oleic acid, oleic acid methyl ester and cholesterol) were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) instrument. In addition, measurements of oxygen transmissibility, light transmittance and observation of lens surface were conducted. The amount of lipid deposition on the 1-day lenses were 127.55 ㎍/lens for Day 1, 302.96 ㎍/lens, for Day 2, and 353.30 ㎍/lens for Day 3. The 3-days lenses were 46.22 ㎍/lens for Day 1, 66.07 ㎍/lens for Day 2, and 67.45 ㎍/lens for Day 3. Oxygen transmissibility were 81×10-9(cm/sec)(ml O2/ml×mmHg)(Baseline) and 48×10-9(cm/sec)(ml O2/ml×mmHg) (Day 3) for the 1-day lenses, it were 13.23×10-9(cm/sec)(ml O2/ml×mmHg)(Baseline) and 9.6×10-9(cm/sec)(ml O2/ml×mmHg) (Day 3) for the 3-days lenses. Transmittance of each lenses were 97.21% (Baseline) and 94.25% (Day 3) for the 1-day lenses, 97.65% (Baseline) and 95.15% (Day 3) for the 3-days lenses. Observation of surface deposition indicated greatest deposition for the 3-days lenses type on Day 3. Lipid deposition for both lens types increased by day and was greater for the 1-day lenses type. Surface deposition appeared to differ as it was greatest for the 3 days lens type, which may suggest other deposits such as protein may be present.
Keywords
ATS(artificial tear solution); HPLC(high performance liquid chromatography); Oxygen transmissibility; Visible light transmittance; SEM (scanning electron microscope);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Papas, E. Exp. Eye. Res. 1998, 67, 25.   DOI
2 Papas, E. Cont. Lens Anterior. Eye. 2014, 37, 394.   DOI
3 Mishima, S. Ophthalmology 1982, 89, 525.   DOI
4 Iskeleli, G.; Karakoc, Y.; Ozkok, A. et al. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2013, 6, 666.   DOI
5 Sheng, H.; Bullimore, M. A. Cornea 2007, 26, 520.   DOI
6 Amann, J.; Holley, G. P.; Lee, S. B. et al. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2003, 135, 584.   DOI
7 Wiffen, S. J.; Hodge, D. O.; Bourne, W. M. Cornea 2000, 19, 47.   DOI
8 Dillehay, S. M.; Miller, M. B. Eye. Cont. Lens. 2007, 33, 272.   DOI
9 Contact Lens Spectrum 2019, 34, 26.
10 Butovich, I. A. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 501.   DOI
11 Butovich, I. A.; Wojtowicz, J. C.; Molai, M. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 2471.   DOI
12 Borchman, D.; Foulks, G. N.; Yapert, M. C. et al. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2007, 147, 87.   DOI
13 Shine, W. E.; McCulley, J. P. Curr. Eye. Res. 2003, 26, 89.   DOI
14 Seifert, P.; Spitznas, M. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 1996, 234, 648.   DOI
15 Kang, Y. S.; Lee, K. J. Korean J. Vis. Sci. 2010, 12, 127.
16 Maziarz, E. P.; Stachowski, M. J.; Liu, X. M. et al. Eye. Contact. Lens. 2006, 32, 300.   DOI
17 Fatt, I.; Chaston, J. Int. Contact. Lens. Clin. 1985, 9, 76.
18 Peng, C. C.; Fajardo, N. P.; Razunguzwa, T. et al. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2015, 92, 768.   DOI
19 Teichroeb, J. H.; Forrest, J. A.; Ngai, V.; T. et al. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2008, 85, 1151.   DOI
20 Sweeney, D. F. Silicone Hydrogels: Structure, Properties and Behaviour, 2nd ed.; Butterworth Heinemann: Oxford, U. K., 2004; p 1.
21 Nicolson, P. C.; Vogt, J. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 3273.   DOI
22 Bontempo, A. R.; Rapp, J. Clao. J. 2001, 27, 75.
23 Grobe, G. L. Contact Lens Spectrum 1999, 14, 14.
24 Heynen, M.; Lorentz, H.; Srinivasan, S. et al. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2011, 88, 1172.   DOI
25 Lopez-Alemany, A.; Compan, V.; Refojo, M. F. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 64, 319.   DOI
26 Bontempo, A. R.; Rapp, J. Curr. Eye. Res. 1996, 16, 776.   DOI
27 Jones, I.; Evans, K.; Sariri, R. et al. Clao. J. 1997, 23, 122.
28 Maissa, C.; Franklin, V.; Guillon, M. et al. Optom. Vis. Sci. 1998, 75, 697.   DOI
29 Jones, L.; Mann, A.; Evans, K.; et al. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2000, 77, 503.   DOI
30 Jang, J. K.; Park, I. J.; Shin, H. S. Korean. J. Vis. Sci. 2014, 16, 227.
31 Park, M. J.; Kwon, H. L.; Choi, S. A. et al. J. Korean. Oph. Opt. Soc. 2013, 18, 429.   DOI
32 Carney, F. P.; Nash, W. L.; Sentell, K. B. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2008, 49, 120.   DOI
33 Jones, L.; Senchyna, M. accessed on 15 Aug, 2019. (http://www.siliconehydrogels.org/editorials/previous_editorial_jones_senchyna.asp.)
34 Holly, I. L. Master Thesis, Vision Science and Chemistry, Waterloo University, 2006.
35 Franklin, V.; Tighe, B. Optom. Vis. Sci. 1996, 73, 16.   DOI
36 Holly, L.; Miriam, H.; Lise, M. K.; et al. Mol. Vis. 2011, 17, 3392.
37 Rebeix, V.; Sommer, F.; Marchin, B. et al. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 1197.   DOI