Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.2.111

Exploring the Progression of Meta-Modeling Knowledge (MMK) and Relationship between MMK Progression Level and Actual Practice for Science Gifted  

Kim, Jung-Eun (Daeseon Elementary School)
Kim, Sungki (Gwangju Science Academy For the Gifted)
Paik, Seoung-Hey (Department of Chemistry Education, Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the progression of MMK and the relationship between MMK progression level and actual practice. First, the Rasch model was used to measure MMK progression level of 51 students twice during the interval of one year. Thereafter, chi-squared test was used to determine whether there was a significant change in MMK progression. As a result of chi-squared test, there was no statistically significant change in MMK progression (p>.05). Secondly, we analyzed the relationship between MMK progression level and practice for 7 gifted students. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that the student's response in practice can not exceed MMK progression level. There were also cases where students have high MMK progression level showed low response in practice. The results of these two studies show that gifted education programs are needed to increase MMK progression and to provide gifted education that can connect knowledge and practice.
Keywords
Science academy; Meta-modeling knowledge (MMK); Progression level;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 National Research Council. National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996.
2 National Research Council. The Next Generation Science Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2013.
3 Kim, S. K.; Kim, J. E.; Paik, S. H. J. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2019, 63, 102.   DOI
4 Cho, H. S.; Nam, J. H.; Oh, P. S. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2017, 37, 239.   DOI
5 Kim, S. K.; Park, C. Y.; Choi, H.; Paik, S. H. J. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2018, 62, 226.   DOI
6 Kang, N. H. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2017, 37, 143.   DOI
7 Somerville, R. C.; Hassol, S. J. Physics Today 2011, 64, 48.   DOI
8 Rosenblueth, A.; Wiener, N. Philosophy of Science 1945, 12, 316.   DOI
9 Cho, E. J.; Kim C. J.; Choe, S. U. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2017, 37, 859.   DOI
10 Kim, S. K., Kim. J. E.; Park, S. H.; Paik, S. H. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2019, 39, 457.   DOI
11 Schwarz, C. V. Is there a connection? The role of metamodeling knowledge in learning with models. In Keeping learning complex: The proceedings of the fifth international conference of the learning sciences; Bell, P.; Stevens, R.; Satwicz, T. NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.
12 Schwarz, C. V.; White B. Y. Cogn. Instr. 2005, 23, 165.   DOI
13 Sarah, G.; Dirk, K. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2018, 55, 1313.   DOI
14 Cha, J. H.; Kim, Y. H.; Noh, T. H. J. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2004, 48, 638.   DOI
15 Crawford, B. A.; Cullin, M. J. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2004, 26, 1379.   DOI
16 Gilbert, S. W. Model Building and a Definition of Science. Jornal of Research in Science Teaching, 1991, 28, 73.   DOI
17 Grosslight, L.; Unger, C.; Jay, E.; Smith, C. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1991, 28, 799.   DOI
18 Harrison, A. G.; Treagust, D. F. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2000, 22, 1011.   DOI
19 Lederman, N. G.; Bell. R. L.; Schwartz, R. S. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2002, 39, 497.   DOI
20 Lim, H. J. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2005, 25, 297.
21 Pluta, W.; Chinn, C.; Duncan, R. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2011, 48, 486.   DOI
22 Snir, J.; Smith, C.; Raz, G. Sci. Educ. 2003, 87, 794.   DOI
23 Treagust, D. F.; Chittleborough, G. D.; Mamiala, T. L. Res. Sci. Educ. 2004, 34, 1.   DOI
24 Yun, H. J.; Kim, H. B. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2018, 38, 541.   DOI
25 Park, K. J.; Ryu, C. R. J. Kor. Ass. Sci. Educ. 2017, 37, 625.   DOI
26 Kim, S. K.; Paik, S. H. J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 2271.   DOI
27 Lee, Y. J.; Kim, Y. M.; Lee, B. J.; Shin, Y. J. J. Gifted/Talented Educ. 2016, 26, 405.   DOI
28 Shin, Y. J.; Ryu, C. L.; Kim, H. M.; Lee, Y. J. J. Gifted/Talented Educ. 2015, 25, 381.   DOI
29 Jung, H. C.; Ryu, C. L.; Chae, Y. J. J. Gifted/Talented Educ. 2012, 22, 243.   DOI
30 Jung, H. C.; Chae, Y. J.; Ryu, C. L. Gifted/Talented Educ. 2012, 22, 597.   DOI
31 Hong, Y. K. Kor. J. Phil. Educ. 2012, 47, 193.
32 Schon, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action NY: Basic Books, 1983.
33 Lim, S. E. Exploring the impact of modeling instruction with metamodeling upon Elementary Students' metamodeling knowledge and modeling performance. Thesis, Seoul National University, 2019.
34 Oakeshott, M.; Learning and teaching. In The Concept of Education; Peters, R. S.; London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967; pp. 108-122.
35 Oakeshott, M. Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (new and expanded edition). Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1991.
36 Ryle, G. The Concept of Mind. NY: Barnes and Noble, Inc, 1984.
37 Grunkorn, J.; zu Belzen, A. U.; Kruger, D. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2014, 36, 1651.   DOI
38 Lee, H. W. Asia J. Educ. 2000, 1, 249.
39 Pyeon, S. B. J. Philosophical Ideas 2014, 52, 97.
40 Kim, J. S. J. Educ. Res. 2012, 20, 3.
41 Treagust, D.; Chittleborough, G.; Mamiala, T. J. Sci. Educ. 2002, 24, 357.   DOI
42 Patzke, C.; Kruuger, D.; Upmeier zu Belzen, A. Entwicklung von Modellkompetenz im Langsschnitt. In Lehr und Lernforschung in der Biologiedidaktik; Hammann, M.; Mayer, J.; Nicole, W. Eds.; Innsbruck: Studienverlag, 2015; pp. 43-58.
43 Clough, E. E.; Driver, R. Sci. Educ. 1986, 70, 473.   DOI
44 Lee, H. W. Bruner: Structure of Knowledge. Paju: Kyoyookbook, 1988.
45 Barowy, W.; Roberts, N. Modeling as inquiry activity in school science: What's the point? In Modeling and simulation in science and mathematics education; Feurzeig, W; Roberts, N. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999; pp. 197-225.
46 White, B.; Schwarz, C. Alternative approaches to using modeling and simulation tools for teaching science. In Computer modeling and simulation in science education; Feurzeig, W.; Roberts N. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999; pp. 226-256.
47 Carey, S.; Smith, C. Educational Psychologist. 1993, 28, 235   DOI
48 Schwarz, C. Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1998.
49 Schwarz, C.; White, B. Fostering middle school students' understanding of scientific modeling. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, 1998.
50 Lee, J. K. J. Moral & Ethics Educ. 2017, 54, 153.
51 Lederman, N. G. Nature of science: Past, present and future. In Handbook of research on science education; Abell, S. K., Lederman, N. G., Eds; Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007; pp 831-879.
52 Schwarz, C. V.; Reiser, B. J.; Davis, E. A.; Kenyon, L.; Acher, A.; Fortus, D.; Shwartz, Y.; Hug, B.; Krajcik, J. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2009, 46, 632.   DOI
53 Abd-El-Khalick, F. Sci. & Educ. 2013, 22, 2087.   DOI